You routinely call Lopez soft but what exactly is Gallo? The guy has missed more than half his games as a Nugget despite being a perimeter player.
As for the draft order:
*The Clippers, at 7, already had Tim Thomas signed to a long term deal at the 3 spot and drafted Al Thornton, a promising rookie, with the 14th pick just the season before. Needless to say, they were not looking at Gallo with that pick.
*The Bucks at 8, were not looking to draft anyone but Joe Alexander. That guy actually fell in the draft but was still being considered a sleeper. The cherry on top is that he grew up in China and spoke fluent Mandarin. That was a huge plus for them because the season before they drafted Yi Jianlian with a top 5 pick, who wanted no part of Milwaukee. The prevailing thought back then was that Joe could help Yi feel more comfortable in that environment that was devoid of an Asian population.
*The Bobcats at 9, were taking DJ Augustin at all costs because Larry Brown was/is a short-sighted moron. He wanted to replace Raymond Felton above all else, which had him focused on drafting need instead of BPA. As a matter of fact, Jordan and Cho are on record as having wanted Lopez but passed to oblige Brown.
All that means that Gallo would've been available at 10. This is a fact, not an opinion. Par for the course with Walsh though, we reached on a prospect that could've easily been acquired later in the draft (see Toney Douglas, Iman Shumpert, Andy Rautins, Josh Harrellson, etc.).
dk7th wrote:NardDogNation wrote:Gallo at 6, could've been had at 10. We were the only team that was dumb enough to take him that early. The reality is that everyone knew that Brook Lopez was a far superior player and was projected to go no later than 6th but as high as 3. The right move would've been to select Lopez at 6 and then trade down to the Nets for picks 10 and 21. Instead of just Gallo, a good player in his own right, we could've gotten both him AND one of Ryan Anderson, Nick Batum, Serge Ibaka, DeAndre Jordan, Omer Asik, Marc Gasol, etc.
dk7th wrote:CrushAlot wrote:See the Jordan Hill draft, Danillo Gallinari draft, the Renaldo Balkman draft, Sweetney, Frye etc.
ha ha lumping in gallinari with these other players. any opportunity to crap on gallo, right? who should they have drafted 6th that year? who has been more effective and a better pro? gordon is garbage, lopez has been injured and soft, hibbert was a project with one decent season. whatcha got?
1 7 Eric Gordon SG United States Los Angeles Clippers Indiana (Fr.)
1 8 Joe Alexander SF United States Milwaukee Bucks West Virginia (Jr.)
1 9 D. J. Augustin PG United States Charlotte Bobcats Texas (So.)
1 10 Brook Lopez+ C United States New Jersey Nets Stanford (So.)
1 11 Jerryd Bayless PG United States Indiana Pacers (traded to Portland)[b] Arizona (Fr.)
1 12 Jason Thompson PF United States Sacramento Kings Rider (Sr.)
1 13 Brandon Rush SG United States Portland Trail Blazers (traded to Indiana)[b] Kansas (Jr.)
1 14 Anthony RandolphPF United Statesb[›]Golden State Warriors LSU (Fr.)
1 15 Robin Lopez C United States Phoenix Suns (from Atlanta)[n] Stanford (So.)
1 16 Marreese SpeightsPF United States Philadelphia 76ers Florida (So.)
1 17 Roy Hibbert+ C United StatesJamaicac[›]Toronto Raptors (traded to Indiana)[c] Georgetown (Sr.)
1 18 JaVale McGee C United States Washington Wizards Nevada (So.)
1 19 J. J. Hickson PF United States Cleveland Cavaliers NC State (Fr.)
1 20 Alexis Ajinça C France Charlotte Bobcats (from Denver)[o] Hyères-Toulon (France) 1988
"could've been had at 10" is pure speculation. the knicks had hired d'antoni, and d'antoni teams have zero need for a plodding, passing-averse, soft big man. the knicks had no need for lopez based on their plan to run a SSOL offense. now, if you want to insist that the only way to draft is always based on "the best player available" you may have a point-- one that i happen to disagree with-- but then i would also argue, and back up with statistics and my own eye test, that they are very close in talent.