[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Danny Green showing why you dont pay role players big money
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/1/2015  2:01 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:This is just pure BULL ISH. You can't just cherry pick the one time the guy has a down set of games and make that the proof that he's not worth Signing.

Playoffs Stats
Season Age Pos G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% eFG% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2010-11 23 SG 4 0 1.8 0.5 1.5 .333 0.3 1.0 .250 0.3 0.5 .500 .417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.3
2011-12 24 SG 14 12 20.6 2.7 6.5 .418 1.4 4.1 .345 1.3 2.4 .545 .527 0.5 0.7 .700 0.2 3.0 3.2 1.1 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.7 7.4
2012-13 25 SG 21 21 31.9 4.0 8.9 .446 2.6 5.4 .482 1.3 3.4 .389 .594 0.6 0.7 .800 0.9 3.3 4.1 1.5 1.0 1.1 0.9 2.4 11.1
2013-14 26 SG 23 23 23.0 3.4 6.9 .491 2.1 4.4 .475 1.3 2.5 .517 .642 0.4 0.5 .818 0.4 2.6 3.0 0.9 1.4 0.7 0.9 2.2 9.3

2014-15 27 SG 6 6 28.2 2.5 8.2 .306 1.5 5.5 .273 1.0 2.7 .375 .398 0.5 0.8 .600 0.8 1.5 2.3 2.0 0.8 0.3 0.8 1.3 7.0

Advanced Stats
Season Age Tm Lg Pos G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% OWS DWS WS WS/48 OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
2010-11 23 SAS NBA SG 4 7 26.0 .417 .667 .000 0.0 17.0 8.3 70.8 7.6 10.3 14.3 46.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 .027 11.4 12.0 23.4 0.0
2011-12 24 SAS NBA SG 14 289 11.7 .540 .637 .110 1.3 16.3 9.1 7.9 1.3 2.5 13.6 17.8 0.1 0.3 0.4 .065 -0.2 1.6 1.4 0.2
2012-13 25 SAS NBA SG 21 669 15.2 .605 .613 .081 3.2 11.5 7.5 7.4 1.8 2.6 9.0 15.0 1.2 0.9 2.1 .154 3.7 2.1 5.8 1.2
2013-14 26 SAS NBA SG 23 529 16.5 .650 .635 .069 2.0 13.0 7.6 5.9 3.1 2.6 10.9 16.1 0.9 1.0 1.9 .172 3.9 3.4 7.3 1.2

2014-15 27 SAS NBA SG 6 169 6.8 .410 .673 .102 3.1 5.8 4.4 10.5 1.5 0.9 8.9 14.9 -0.1 0.1 0.0 .010


Look at his full history in terms of his career performance. Last 3 years he was showing great production as a "role player" for his team. Look at his


3pt%, eFG%, TS% and WS/48 in the previous playoffs.

Hes a role player and he cant get to the FT line. Many of his shots are created by the spacing the Spurs receive by having Tim Duncan in the post. On the other end same rules apply--he can play up on his man because he has two 7 footers protecting the basket. So he can make plays by over extending without thinking twice.


OK you guys do realize that this is exactly what the Knicks are looking to do, right? The Knicks are looking to add rim protecting bigs this summer as well as a post threat and so Danny Green's skills would be equally useful on our team. Also Danny is a good help defender and rebounds well.

Now I agree that Danny Green is not a strong penetration guard, but that is not to say that he never drives or scores inside.

AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/1/2015  2:06 PM
nix, you can post all the shotcharts in the world. danny green is nothing more than a system guard who shoots 3's, most of the time wide-open. he looks especially good because he's playing next to tim duncan, ginoboli, parker kawhi. the guy doesn't deserve big money, if he's wise, he'll stay in san antonio where the the system and players around him, suit him.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/1/2015  2:21 PM
nyk4ever wrote:nix, you can post all the shotcharts in the world. danny green is nothing more than a system guard who shoots 3's, most of the time wide-open. he looks especially good because he's playing next to tim duncan, ginoboli, parker kawhi. the guy doesn't deserve big money, if he's wise, he'll stay in san antonio where the the system and players around him, suit him.

Who said anything about paying him "big money"? I'm saying that he's a much better player than anyone we have playing SG. He's a very good defender and a very efficient scorer. I think people seem to think that somehow him being a role player is a negative, when in fact if we did draft a big and add another big in FA, then we would need a SG who can be effective without having to run a ton of plays for him. Green has a role where he is moving and cutting and then catching and shooting. This is no different than Wesley Matthews, Ray Allen or Kyle Korver! 3 and D guards are a very real and useful thing in the NBA.

I'd like to know which SG do you guys think we can get this summer who would be better than Danny Green?


Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% OWS DWS WS WS/48 ▾ VORP
1 Jimmy Butler SG 25 CHI 65 2513 21.3 .583 .212 .508 5.1 11.2 8.2 14.4 2.3 1.0 7.7 21.6 8.2 3.0 11.2 .214 4.2
2 Danny Green SG 27 SAS 81 2312 16.5 .596 .619 .172 2.7 13.9 8.4 10.3 2.2 2.8 10.5 17.5 4.0 3.9 7.8 .163 4.1

3 W. Matthews SG 28 POR 60 2024 16.1 .586 .592 .193 2.1 9.5 5.9 10.8 1.9 0.4 9.0 19.8 4.0 2.2 6.2 .147 3.0
4 Alexey Shved SG 26 TOT 42 767 19.5 .541 .415 .448 3.3 11.7 7.3 25.7 2.0 0.6 10.7 26.3 1.7 0.5 2.2 .135 0.5
5 Mar Belinelli SG 28 SAS 62 1388 12.4 .553 .489 .211 2.2 10.5 6.4 10.3 1.1 0.2 10.6 18.8 1.5 1.4 2.9 .100 0.5
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/1/2015  2:31 PM
nixluva wrote:
nyk4ever wrote:nix, you can post all the shotcharts in the world. danny green is nothing more than a system guard who shoots 3's, most of the time wide-open. he looks especially good because he's playing next to tim duncan, ginoboli, parker kawhi. the guy doesn't deserve big money, if he's wise, he'll stay in san antonio where the the system and players around him, suit him.

Who said anything about paying him "big money"? I'm saying that he's a much better player than anyone we have playing SG. He's a very good defender and a very efficient scorer. I think people seem to think that somehow him being a role player is a negative, when in fact if we did draft a big and add another big in FA, then we would need a SG who can be effective without having to run a ton of plays for him. Green has a role where he is moving and cutting and then catching and shooting. This is no different than Wesley Matthews, Ray Allen or Kyle Korver! 3 and D guards are a very real and useful thing in the NBA.

I'd like to know which SG do you guys think we can get this summer who would be better than Danny Green?


Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% OWS DWS WS WS/48 ▾ VORP
1 Jimmy Butler SG 25 CHI 65 2513 21.3 .583 .212 .508 5.1 11.2 8.2 14.4 2.3 1.0 7.7 21.6 8.2 3.0 11.2 .214 4.2
2 Danny Green SG 27 SAS 81 2312 16.5 .596 .619 .172 2.7 13.9 8.4 10.3 2.2 2.8 10.5 17.5 4.0 3.9 7.8 .163 4.1

3 W. Matthews SG 28 POR 60 2024 16.1 .586 .592 .193 2.1 9.5 5.9 10.8 1.9 0.4 9.0 19.8 4.0 2.2 6.2 .147 3.0
4 Alexey Shved SG 26 TOT 42 767 19.5 .541 .415 .448 3.3 11.7 7.3 25.7 2.0 0.6 10.7 26.3 1.7 0.5 2.2 .135 0.5
5 Mar Belinelli SG 28 SAS 62 1388 12.4 .553 .489 .211 2.2 10.5 6.4 10.3 1.1 0.2 10.6 18.8 1.5 1.4 2.9 .100 0.5

well to leave the spurs, he's doing to require big money. of course guys who shoot the 3 and play defense are synonymous with any contending team, but we're better off finding our own instead of paying for one, especially one who is playing on a team that makes ALL players look good. our money is much better utilized in other places than buying role players.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/1/2015  2:50 PM
nyk4ever wrote:
nixluva wrote:
nyk4ever wrote:nix, you can post all the shotcharts in the world. danny green is nothing more than a system guard who shoots 3's, most of the time wide-open. he looks especially good because he's playing next to tim duncan, ginoboli, parker kawhi. the guy doesn't deserve big money, if he's wise, he'll stay in san antonio where the the system and players around him, suit him.

Who said anything about paying him "big money"? I'm saying that he's a much better player than anyone we have playing SG. He's a very good defender and a very efficient scorer. I think people seem to think that somehow him being a role player is a negative, when in fact if we did draft a big and add another big in FA, then we would need a SG who can be effective without having to run a ton of plays for him. Green has a role where he is moving and cutting and then catching and shooting. This is no different than Wesley Matthews, Ray Allen or Kyle Korver! 3 and D guards are a very real and useful thing in the NBA.

I'd like to know which SG do you guys think we can get this summer who would be better than Danny Green?


Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% OWS DWS WS WS/48 ▾ VORP
1 Jimmy Butler SG 25 CHI 65 2513 21.3 .583 .212 .508 5.1 11.2 8.2 14.4 2.3 1.0 7.7 21.6 8.2 3.0 11.2 .214 4.2
2 Danny Green SG 27 SAS 81 2312 16.5 .596 .619 .172 2.7 13.9 8.4 10.3 2.2 2.8 10.5 17.5 4.0 3.9 7.8 .163 4.1

3 W. Matthews SG 28 POR 60 2024 16.1 .586 .592 .193 2.1 9.5 5.9 10.8 1.9 0.4 9.0 19.8 4.0 2.2 6.2 .147 3.0
4 Alexey Shved SG 26 TOT 42 767 19.5 .541 .415 .448 3.3 11.7 7.3 25.7 2.0 0.6 10.7 26.3 1.7 0.5 2.2 .135 0.5
5 Mar Belinelli SG 28 SAS 62 1388 12.4 .553 .489 .211 2.2 10.5 6.4 10.3 1.1 0.2 10.6 18.8 1.5 1.4 2.9 .100 0.5

well to leave the spurs, he's doing to require big money. of course guys who shoot the 3 and play defense are synonymous with any contending team, but we're better off finding our own instead of paying for one, especially one who is playing on a team that makes ALL players look good. our money is much better utilized in other places than buying role players.


Wouldn't that assessment depend on how much we're talking about? We don't have a number for how much it would take to get Green to sign with us. I wouldn't assume that it's going to be astronomical. Also it would take a VERY good prospect to equal the production of Danny Green. This is why I post his efficiency stats because I want it to be clear how good he actually has been in his role. I don't even think he's doing all that he could do as a player. He's being smart in filling in what the Spurs need him to do, but that doesn't mean he can't do more.

I'd like to know who it is that others are suggesting we should get instead of Green. We can't just wait on some mythical young prospect who is better. Danny Green is proven and despite this one poor performance he's been VERY good over his career. If we had him as a SG on this team it would've made a huge difference.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 40245
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/1/2015  3:12 PM
smackeddog wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
smackeddog wrote:We should only judge players on their most recent 6 games when deciding which free agents to sign- that is a recipe for success!


6 games--hes been a role player is whole career

We need role players and Phil has said the aim will not be to land the big name max guys, but likely we will target a few 2nd and 3rd their players. I'm not saying crazy money for Green, but 6 or 7 mil would be fine, if we have it left over.


Exactly. We need guys I who are smart enough to play in a system and play defense. No one is saying we should overpay Green a whole lot. Bit he is target as a long we're sticking to the triangle.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/1/2015  3:14 PM
Just to add some more evidence to support the idea of Danny Green. His Defensive Win shares was 3.9, which was actually higher than Jimmy Butler 3.0. It was claimed that the reason for his defensive success was mostly because of the bigs behind him, but I think it would be helpful to at least see him in action to show his effort level on D.

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
5/1/2015  5:07 PM
It would likely take over 10 mil starting to get Green to leave SA. he's making 4 mil now, and I can see them easily paying him 7 starting. 10 is too much for a systematic roleplayer.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/1/2015  5:20 PM
knickscity wrote:It would likely take over 10 mil starting to get Green to leave SA. he's making 4 mil now, and I can see them easily paying him 7 starting. 10 is too much for a systematic roleplayer.

Well perhaps the Knicks are willing to pay $10 mil or maybe they can get him for just under that. IMO he would be worth it. He's much more than people are trying to make him out to be. His advanced stats suggest that he's only behind Jimmy Butler among FA SG's. His defensive stats are even better than Jimmy Butler. I know people tend to make up their minds about players but that's why I post advanced stats to back up the truth about players.

Green is not an elite athletic SG, but he's 6'6.5", he's got good defensive instincts, quick hands and he's long, 6'10" wingspan. So he is more than just a role player. He's one of the best 2 way SG's in the league. He gets underrated because of the team he plays for and that he's not fancy or explosive. He's merely a highly productive and winning player.

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
5/1/2015  5:37 PM
nixluva wrote:
knickscity wrote:It would likely take over 10 mil starting to get Green to leave SA. he's making 4 mil now, and I can see them easily paying him 7 starting. 10 is too much for a systematic roleplayer.

Well perhaps the Knicks are willing to pay $10 mil or maybe they can get him for just under that. IMO he would be worth it. He's much more than people are trying to make him out to be. His advanced stats suggest that he's only behind Jimmy Butler among FA SG's. His defensive stats are even better than Jimmy Butler. I know people tend to make up their minds about players but that's why I post advanced stats to back up the truth about players.

Green is not an elite athletic SG, but he's 6'6.5", he's got good defensive instincts, quick hands and he's long, 6'10" wingspan. So he is more than just a role player. He's one of the best 2 way SG's in the league. He gets underrated because of the team he plays for and that he's not fancy or explosive. He's merely a highly productive and winning player.


I believe alot of his merits are related to the cast of players he plays with. true enough he does make his shots efficiently and that is on him, but the spacing he gets and the system promoting such space really helps his game. Defensively the Spurs play a good team defense, not surprised he'd excel in such a structure.

Still wouldnt pay over 10, and I cant see him leaving for less. He's on a contender and he's already a starter. Other than money it makes no sense for him to leave.

crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
5/1/2015  5:58 PM
Overpaying Danny Green reminds me of when Scott Layden overpaid for Shandon Anderson and Howard Eisley. Both guys who looked nice in a system and played with all-time greats who made them look a little better than they were.

Anyone who was following the Knicks back then knows that we all immediately regretted it and hated their contracts for years.

¿ △ ?
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/1/2015  6:19 PM
I'd take Green at $8-10m over Monte "get to the basket" Ellis at $15m. I'd also take him over Aaron Afflalo.. What exactly do people expect to offer starting caliper FAs when the cap is about to explode?
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
5/1/2015  6:24 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:I'd take Green at $8-10m over Monte "get to the basket" Ellis at $15m. I'd also take him over Aaron Afflalo.. What exactly do people expect to offer starting caliper FAs when the cap is about to explode?

Monta has never made 15 and currently makes around 8. he's definitely at great value for what he produces. Now sure why promoting bad spending is equating the cap spike. More money to spend dont mean spend it like a fool who never had it before.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 40245
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/1/2015  6:30 PM
nixluva wrote:
knickscity wrote:It would likely take over 10 mil starting to get Green to leave SA. he's making 4 mil now, and I can see them easily paying him 7 starting. 10 is too much for a systematic roleplayer.

Well perhaps the Knicks are willing to pay $10 mil or maybe they can get him for just under that. IMO he would be worth it. He's much more than people are trying to make him out to be. His advanced stats suggest that he's only behind Jimmy Butler among FA SG's. His defensive stats are even better than Jimmy Butler. I know people tend to make up their minds about players but that's why I post advanced stats to back up the truth about players.

Green is not an elite athletic SG, but he's 6'6.5", he's got good defensive instincts, quick hands and he's long, 6'10" wingspan. So he is more than just a role player. He's one of the best 2 way SG's in the league. He gets underrated because of the team he plays for and that he's not fancy or explosive. He's merely a highly productive and winning player.


Agree. The dude fills a need regardless of where we pick in the draft. There's no need speculating how much he'll get paid until we reach that point. It makes more sense to live him on the board than to start zeroing on big man free agents agents ñ at this point. Why go all in on Brooke lopez, Kanter or Monroe if we don't know if we're picking Okafor, Towns, Russell or Mudiay yet?
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/1/2015  6:55 PM
knickscity wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:I'd take Green at $8-10m over Monte "get to the basket" Ellis at $15m. I'd also take him over Aaron Afflalo.. What exactly do people expect to offer starting caliper FAs when the cap is about to explode?

Monta has never made 15 and currently makes around 8. he's definitely at great value for what he produces. Now sure why promoting bad spending is equating the cap spike. More money to spend dont mean spend it like a fool who never had it before.

No one is promoting bad spending but I am making assumption based on how players were paid in the pass and including market value inflation. J.J. Redick signed a 4 year / $27,755,000 contract in 2013-2014 and Trevor Ariza signed a 4 year / $32,000,002 contract in 2014-2015, those two player are similar to Green. He has the 3pt shooting track record like(not exactly) Redick and w defensive track record like Ariza, so shouldn't we expect him to get similar money? Keep in mind the ages of those FAs and those players were signed in a lower cap than what next year will be. Redick and Ariza are just two examples there are more past wing signings that will help get a clearer picture. On top of that you probably need to look around the league and examine the 2 guard market.

Re Ellis: thats a number I think he will ask for this summer if he opts out.

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
5/1/2015  7:45 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
knickscity wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:I'd take Green at $8-10m over Monte "get to the basket" Ellis at $15m. I'd also take him over Aaron Afflalo.. What exactly do people expect to offer starting caliper FAs when the cap is about to explode?

Monta has never made 15 and currently makes around 8. he's definitely at great value for what he produces. Now sure why promoting bad spending is equating the cap spike. More money to spend dont mean spend it like a fool who never had it before.

No one is promoting bad spending but I am making assumption based on how players were paid in the pass and including market value inflation. J.J. Redick signed a 4 year / $27,755,000 contract in 2013-2014 and Trevor Ariza signed a 4 year / $32,000,002 contract in 2014-2015, those two player are similar to Green. He has the 3pt shooting track record like(not exactly) Redick and w defensive track record like Ariza, so shouldn't we expect him to get similar money? Keep in mind the ages of those FAs and those players were signed in a lower cap than what next year will be. Redick and Ariza are just two examples there are more past wing signings that will help get a clearer picture. On top of that you probably need to look around the league and examine the 2 guard market.

Re Ellis: thats a number I think he will ask for this summer if he opts out.


Actually I dont think it's expected, I do think he'll stay in SA.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/1/2015  9:07 PM
Spending 10mms on a player who can't get to the ft line insane. No argument just a player that we dontneed
RIP Crushalot😞
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/1/2015  9:29 PM
knickscity wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
knickscity wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:I'd take Green at $8-10m over Monte "get to the basket" Ellis at $15m. I'd also take him over Aaron Afflalo.. What exactly do people expect to offer starting caliper FAs when the cap is about to explode?

Monta has never made 15 and currently makes around 8. he's definitely at great value for what he produces. Now sure why promoting bad spending is equating the cap spike. More money to spend dont mean spend it like a fool who never had it before.

No one is promoting bad spending but I am making assumption based on how players were paid in the pass and including market value inflation. J.J. Redick signed a 4 year / $27,755,000 contract in 2013-2014 and Trevor Ariza signed a 4 year / $32,000,002 contract in 2014-2015, those two player are similar to Green. He has the 3pt shooting track record like(not exactly) Redick and w defensive track record like Ariza, so shouldn't we expect him to get similar money? Keep in mind the ages of those FAs and those players were signed in a lower cap than what next year will be. Redick and Ariza are just two examples there are more past wing signings that will help get a clearer picture. On top of that you probably need to look around the league and examine the 2 guard market.

Re Ellis: thats a number I think he will ask for this summer if he opts out.


Actually I dont think it's expected, I do think he'll stay in SA.

That's higly likely but why would they want some guy at 8m-10m when they can get a D-leaguer.

The Spurs are in such great shape they can do so many things in FA.

callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

5/1/2015  10:12 PM
id spend 6-8mill on dgreen...id pay 10mill to get carroll - a better version...3&d guys are so valuable
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/1/2015  10:27 PM
Carroll is worth it green is not
RIP Crushalot😞
Danny Green showing why you dont pay role players big money

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy