Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by NYKDUNK:
I don't believe Marbury and Nash are that different.
Nash is a nice player but marbury is better in every aspect of the game
Nice way to sum it up.
Nash can't have the same impact on game like marbury can.
Nash is guardable one on one and marbury, to be honnest, isn't.
Nash can't destroy opposite PG as marbury regulary does.
Don't forget one thing, nash played in nellie's sytem, which makes plauyers looks much better than they are, as all systems based on ball movement (see sactown, utah...). He also was surrounded by scoring option, especially very good shooters, which made very hard for the opponents to clog the lane or double him like they did to stephon.
IMHO, though a very good and nice PG, he's not worth what they paid for.