BRIGGS wrote:So far Phils commitment to defense was trading one of the better defenders in the league--Chandler for the worst defender in the league Calderon.
I'm still trying to understand the reason behind that trade.
The only thing I come up with is he doesn't think Chandler is the type to run the triangle....And doesn't have the outside jumper or offensive IQ to make those decisions. And he thought Calderon was going to be a rejuvenated High IQ player, who can learn and flourish in his system. So far, that trade has back fired, and I think even he will tell you that.
Chandler also checked out earlier in the season.....He didn't seem like he cared too much. So did Phil think he was replaceable due to the bigs in the draft and in free agency? It's possible.
Phil has never been the type to figure out, even during his championship runs. So I'll just say it was a good thought, but if it backfires, like he has, then he just set us up for an even higher pick. With Chandler, we probably wouldn't have the worst record right now. So it worked out in the end. He likes his starting bigs to have some brains. And the bigs with no brains, come off the bench.....At least that's the patterns I've seen from his Chicago to LA days. Chandler was never known to be a great passer.....Which is a skill that's needed in the triangle. OK4 would fit in nicely on offense. I won't debate on the defense again, you already know where I stand.
But we will see based on this pick. I know when we traded Chandler, our rim protection dropped so far, it was instant. I'm sure Phil sees that clear as day. And after scouting Kentucky, I'm sure he will try to get some kind of rim protection from somewhere....But hopefully at a cheaper price than Chandler.....
Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland.
The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!