MS wrote:Worth starting another thread, but to date Phil gets an F for the work he has done here.You don't move big men coming off a disappointing season in a contract year. There is just no upside and teams making a push for a title would have given up picks in order to get a starting center and who knows what else. if the cavs got two number 1's for moz tyson surely could have got us an asset.
JR and Shump have contributed in cleveland so what was the rush to move both before the deadline? we took on an additional 3.5MM in salary in Caledron and that number jumps to 7 if felton declines his option.
Fisher at 5MM a year for 5 years? how do you make him one of the highest paid coaches in the NBA, classic knicks move.
Seems like Phil just went with the flow and then panicked and moved pieces too soon.
Reminds me of Walsh when the knicks started off 5-3 and then moved jamal and zach for 10 cents on the dollar.
I love how with the power of hindsight, people are making out that the tyson trade was an obvious disaster at the time. Strange how no one said that at the time. Mosgov got 2 picks because he's locked into a cheaper contract for two seasons. tyson is expiring. You would likely have got one late first rounder for him. Instead we got two seconds (one of which was early who was projected to be a late first rounder) and Larkin. There's not much difference. Stop making out that we would have got a hundred lottery picks for him.
What happened last year when we kept shump until the deadline? Oh that's right, he got injured and we couldn't trade him. Shump and JR were not gaining value on this team. jR had the foot tear, Shump had dislocated his finger and shoulder, they had to go asap- of course, with the power of hindsight now you can travel back in time and say they didn't get injured. Well done! Also the aim was to lose more games, so it made sense to get rid of them earlier.
Everyone said Felton and JR were UNTRADEABLE, he got rid of both- let's all pretend no one said that and getting rid of them was a given!
Who gives a crap how much fisher gets paid? Once you'd offered Kerr that deal, you'd look racist if you offered Fisher less (both had zero coaching experience)
We have a shot at the number one pick, we have cap space, and with Melo we are a more tempting destination for free agents (no one wants to go to an empty team- regardless of how you feel about Melo).