nyk4ever wrote:im not sure how much you know about him either since all you said is that he has an offensive game and can defend. i know a bit about kanter myself, but i'd like to hear your scouting report on him.

I can answer that. Dude has a gifted touch on the inside. He has very good moves once in the paint. He can finish with both hands. He has a great first step and motor. I think he would have no problem in the triangle cuz hes a reactive players. He can hit the jumper as well.

On the defense, he's adequate. He's not bad like Amare. He's active cuz of his motor. He is like lou amundson in the was that he knows to seal off the lane. He's not a shot blocker.

EnySpree wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:im not sure how much you know about him either since all you said is that he has an offensive game and can defend. i know a bit about kanter myself, but i'd like to hear your scouting report on him.

I can answer that. Dude has a gifted touch on the inside. He has very good moves once in the paint. He can finish with both hands. He has a great first step and motor. I think he would have no problem in the triangle cuz hes a reactive players. He can hit the jumper as well.

On the defense, he's adequate. He's not bad like Amare. He's active cuz of his motor. He is like lou amundson in the was that he knows to seal off the lane. He's not a shot blocker.

Other words, he is a young big who can improve under the right coaching. Trade for him; what do we have to lose? As long as we are not trading a pick.

EnySpree wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:im not sure how much you know about him either since all you said is that he has an offensive game and can defend. i know a bit about kanter myself, but i'd like to hear your scouting report on him.

I can answer that. Dude has a gifted touch on the inside. He has very good moves once in the paint. He can finish with both hands. He has a great first step and motor. I think he would have no problem in the triangle cuz hes a reactive players. He can hit the jumper as well.

On the defense, he's adequate. He's not bad like Amare. He's active cuz of his motor. He is like lou amundson in the was that he knows to seal off the lane. He's not a shot blocker.

i know all about kanter, was high on him coming from turkey, but i wanted to hear 69s interpretation. kanter has been mentioned here ad-nauseam over the years.

Knicks1969 wrote:

EnySpree wrote:He's a skilled inside guy man. I'd love to get him now but the draft right there. I'd hate to lose out on the guy especially if we can't get towns or okafor

I wod trade for the dude; specifically, if we can get Utah to give us a draft pick. Please remember that we have zero pick for next year. Their back court is very young; they might be incline to trade kanter and a pick for Calderon

why would utah give us a pick??

Knicks1969 wrote:

mreinman wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:

EnySpree wrote:He's a skilled inside guy man. I'd love to get him now but the draft right there. I'd hate to lose out on the guy especially if we can't get towns or okafor

I wod trade for the dude; specifically, if we can get Utah to give us a draft pick. Please remember that we have zero pick for next year. Their back court is very young; they might be incline to trade kanter and a pick for Calderon

why would utah give us a pick??

Do you not know Utah's biggest problem? They can't attract free agents; the only way they can obtain veteran leadership is via a trade. With the wealth of youth they currently have, it is behooved them to get a couple of veterans to help groom them. It is not a guaranty that the young kids will want to stay in Utah once their rookie contract is over.

dude ... you are a good poster and passionate but this is the most preposterous proposal I have ever seen.

They will give up Kanter and a number 1 pick for the rights to take on Jose Calderon and his bloated contract?

Maybe if we send them Calderon and 2 number one picks then they would give us Kanter.