mreinman wrote:this gets my vote for most ridiculous post/suggestion of the month.

theres been a ton of entrants into that discussion.

nyk4ever wrote:why would you give up a first round pick for someone who's probably going to be a free-agent next year anyway?

Had Phil traded Shumpert by himself what would you all have expected back?

A 1st rounder right even if it had heavy protection

So why wouldn't we trade a future first for $7-8mil of cap space

So in other words you guys absolutely hated the Cavs trade

F500ONE wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:why would you give up a first round pick for someone who's probably going to be a free-agent next year anyway?

Had Phil traded Shumpert by himself what would you all have expected back?

A 1st rounder right even if it had heavy protection

So why wouldn't we trade a future first for $7-8mil of cap space

So in other words you guys absolutely hated the Cavs trade

the difference

between kevin love

and wilson chandler

is pretty vast

that's a very poor

comparison for you

to make

nyk4ever wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:why would you give up a first round pick for someone who's probably going to be a free-agent next year anyway?

Had Phil traded Shumpert by himself what would you all have expected back?

A 1st rounder right even if it had heavy protection

So why wouldn't we trade a future first for $7-8mil of cap space

So in other words you guys absolutely hated the Cavs trade

the difference

between kevin love

and wilson chandler

is pretty vast

that's a very poor

comparison for you

to make

L
O
L

There are times when we all made bad posts or a thought jumped thru our fingers without much thought. Some a more frequent occurance.
There are times when you say, "yeah, that was a silly thought", or "upon further thought, Im wrong".......
This might be one of those times.
To defend a point even when its not constructed properly fuels my perception that you'd rather be "right" than "Accurate"!
I think the fact some are even willing to argue this with you is pretty generous of them.

Usually I try to bring a point of conversation and even my position. But in this case all I can say is: "Shy Wilson for Calderone and an 1st round pick is just ignorent".
I should say why right? Nope, its just so plainly bad I cannot dignify it but very relieved your not running the team.

I should add that ideas like that make you really uncredible to even remotely critique Phil on any mistake he might have made. its like you just suck up bandwith and waste it.

F500ONE wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:why would you give up a first round pick for someone who's probably going to be a free-agent next year anyway?

Had Phil traded Shumpert by himself what would you all have expected back?

A 1st rounder right even if it had heavy protection

So why wouldn't we trade a future first for $7-8mil of cap space

So in other words you guys absolutely hated the Cavs trade

But if we never assume Chandlers and his contract then the same amount of "cap space" is open at the end of the season, right? So we give up a pick to assume a player who will then walk leaving the same amount of space open if we had never assumed the tail end of his contract anyway? Please explain what you meant cause this makes no sense. What am I missing here?

How is trading a 1st for Chandler in any way the same as dumping Shump + JR? Giving up a 2018 1st for Wilson Chandler, especially on an expiring contract or not, would be a pretty awful move.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/555135873222598656

knicks1248 wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:Denver is having a fire sell. Afflalo is probably on the way out too.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/555135873222598656

Two retarded GM's at work, didn't Nate play with Boston?

knicks1248 wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:Denver is having a fire sell. Afflalo is probably on the way out too.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/555135873222598656

Two retarded GM's at work, didn't Nate play with Boston?

Ainge retarded? The guy is rebuilding that team pretty well. I think they have like 10 or 11 1st rnd picks in the next 3 yrs.

foosballnick wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:why would you give up a first round pick for someone who's probably going to be a free-agent next year anyway?

Had Phil traded Shumpert by himself what would you all have expected back?

A 1st rounder right even if it had heavy protection

So why wouldn't we trade a future first for $7-8mil of cap space

So in other words you guys absolutely hated the Cavs trade

You're either retarded, trolling or perhaps both. Since you've apparently been banned multiple times, I'm guessing both. Chandler is basically a throw away. Calderone's salary although inefficient is manageable given the cap space the Knicks have already tucked away and the looming TV deal revenue which will increase the cap. Shumpert was a first rounder 4 years ago and his value has diminished with the Knicks. The 2018 pick has value as potential...a tradable commodity wortj more than Shumpert and 7 mil in cap space combined.

Stop the lies

Obviously not because one 1st rounder couldn't

Get the Cavs Mozgov it took 2

Dion Waiter had more value than one 1st rounder

If we put the 1st rounder on the market right now by itself

I bet it doesn't bring back more than a talent like Tony Wroten or Dennis Shroeder

What all of you are doing is looking at the poster again

Making this real personal and our past history instead of

Judging based on what the market value suggest where the value lies

And this thread is an obvious omission that no matter the cap space

You guys don't have confidence in Phil's ability to work with it

Nor his ability to put together a team worthwhile where a 1st

Would be of no concern 3yrs down the road

I was thinking outside the box to get some talent on the team NOW

And give the team a little more flexibility

CrushAlot wrote:The picks are heavily protected and it is predicted that they will be second rounders.
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/236168/Cavaliers-Acquire-Timofey-Mozgov-From-Nuggets-For-Two-1st-Rounders

Not really The Cavs for sure will be a Top 12 team next yr[currently 14th]

If not this yr, I believe they go on a mini run second half of season

Keep in mind Lebron missed like 10gms already

The protection next yr basically says as long as they

Aren't a fringe playoff team Nugz get the 1st