Bonn1997 wrote:F500ONE wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:F500ONE wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:There's a difference between hating on Phil and hating what he did last off-season. He bowled gutter after gutter last off-season but yesterday's trade was at least a spare.
Naaahhh he didn't gutter but left a horrible split
Without picking up the spare
I know for a fact had he moved Tyson with Smith in yesterday's trade
And got back say 2 2019 2nd round picks you would be clowning the trade
Huh?
Real simple Bonn had Phil moved Tyson with J.R. so he could
Dump J.R.'s deal, you would not be endorsing the trade as a good one
You're saying if we still had Tyson and if we included him in this deal and if we still only got the same players and one more 2nd round pick in return? I'd hate the trade then but it's a strange thing to bring up now.
Okay so principally speaking although you're higher on Tyson then Shump
I'll agree with you here
But let's keep all things in perspective of what's being valued from us[by other teams]
Just like you reasoned Tyson was coveted by another team who once had decent value
Our stance should always be to capitalize on value
Well we didn't and ended up making a crappy trade with Dallas
Although in the Dallas trade we got back more immediate value in picks[Early & Thanasis]
Created some Exceptions and curbed some salary for this season
The only difference in the trades in terms of badness
We took on Calderon's yucky contract Dallas deal
In the Cleveland deal we gave Shump away for $6mil of cap space
And a crappy pick coming after Phil's deal expires
The two trades are direct contradictions for the purpose of 2015
We also found out from Wojo Cleve's motivation to do deal
They coveted Shumpert and OKC coveted Waiters, therefore we should have asked for more out of the deal