[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Would anyone settle for this offseason
Author Thread
foosballnick
Posts: 21535
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2010
Member: #3148

1/1/2015  4:22 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Sign Goran Dragic 4 years 62mm(starting at 14.5mm)

Trade with Denver and absorb Javalee MCgee's 12mm using cap space for the 11 pick and add Christian Wood 6-11 PF UNLV( a piece that I feel compliments Okafor's game)
Trade Tim Hardaway for a 2016 2nd rounder

Trade our 2017 pick top 7 restricted to any team 19-27 who wants out and the player we want is there 6-4 PG Tyler Harvey


James Dolan

- Always willing to trade future first round picks in an aborted attempt to quick fix the team. These attempts are nearly always doomed to failure
- Always willing to absorb other team's contract/player problems and make them Knick problems. Usually these moves have long term repurcussions
- Always willing to give up on young developing players that the Knicks did formerly draft, whether they ultimately pan out or not, doesn't change the issue that a culture of jettisoning your young players from the draft ruins any chance to build a core and stability that veteran winning teams have as a baseline.
- Always willing to pay or overpay a veteran player, who will likely not move the needle for the team as a whole, short term or long term.

Briggs

- Like Dolan, wants to keep up the trend of dumping future first round draft picks. To gain a player in the back half of the draft. While some pan out, how many don't? All while projecting prospects future when most of the actual NBA front offices wait until at least the NCAA tournament is over to try to balance out potential draft day value.

- Like Dolan, wants to take other team's contract/player problems. If the Knicks were lucky enough to win the lottery and get Okafor, how does putting him through even one year of headcase JaVale McGee help him? ( And yet again, only happens in a trade that Denver never makes, last time Briggs said Denver would give up Nurkic and a first to get out of McGees last year, now it's just one first rounder. Is that supposed to be seen as progress towards objective reality?)

- Like Dolan, wants to dump young drafted players, because they don't instantly produce, but yet believes mass acquiring THREE rookies at once will all produce, one in Okafor he claims will absolutely produce at a historic and HOF level, and that the other two will not bust at all and absolutely be stone cold locks for building a contender.

- Like Dolan, wants to open up the check book for a veteran who won't make a difference if this team was constructed ( You want him to roll with a team with three rookies and JaVale McGee and produce at his current clip?) But I guess it would be Dolan like to spend 60 million on a team president who uses a complex offensive system that negates the need for a ball dominant point guard, spend another 25 in a coach to teach it, then load up big money on point guards in Dragic and Calderon combined, at the brutal cost of not helping other parts of the roster.

Anyone ever know someone in high school who had an opportunity? I knew someone who did well and got a full scholarship offer plus room and board. They rejected it because they thought their high school relationship would go somewhere. With someone who was in a band. How do you think that turned out?

The high schooler who takes that scholarship, the longer road, goes to college, works hard, tries to lay groundwork for the future, it's not fast, it's not sexy, but it's trying to build something that lasts. It's not neon lights like hooking up with the next lead singer for the Beatles. Or saying you ditched a full college ride for a shot in the dark.

Briggs, your version of things would be for that kid to set that scholarship on fire then be a roadie/groupie for the band, while working some minimum wage dead end jobs on the side. Dolan thinks that way, which is why he's failed at everything except he was fortunate to be saved by his pops money. Quick fix, reactionary, taking the long shot and short cut.

I suppose my version is less cinematic. Take the scholarship. Pay the hard road now. Hope you establish a foundation even if it's not the sexiest looking option to start.

Thanks for keeping the spirit of Dolan here Briggs, as we ring in the New Year, I salute your continued homage to the Sure Shot himself.

Cool commentary bro. Just wondering what you've done in life that makes your opinions here so much better and with so much more expertise that you choose to denigrate, belittle and take personal shots at another posters opinions?

AUTOADVERT
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/1/2015  4:31 PM
Its pretty simple

Its nearly impossible to acquire quality BIGS in free agency. This draft year is "unique" with many 4-5's of value that will run up and down the first round. We are almost assured a great player up top--MUCH more to see but Im confident of a high value return with this high draft asset.


Use our secondary cap space(I believe up to 13.5mm) our 2018 pick(top 7 restricted) to go "all in" on this draft. My goal is three 1's and a 2.

Simply outspend either Phoenix for Dragic(my choice #1)Milwaukee for Knight or Chicago for Butler. Realistic Dragic but also a great option


I need EVERY single dollar I can get to work this--that is why I "would" waive Calderon. we NEED his 4.5mm we need it badly. IF I could pull off an additional pick in the 10-15 range using that cap space to find synergy with our top pick--we expedite rebuilding by 1.5 years.


Plan B is to have maximum flexibility in 2016 to take run at KD. I believe if we have all the Ducks in place New york becomes a destination for him.

Fck this 6 yr rebuilding BS talk. That is talk of a negative nelly. Ten toes in--all in aggression to be better immediately

RIP Crushalot😞
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/1/2015  7:17 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Sign Goran Dragic 4 years 62mm(starting at 14.5mm)

Trade with Denver and absorb Javalee MCgee's 12mm using cap space for the 11 pick and add Christian Wood 6-11 PF UNLV( a piece that I feel compliments Okafor's game)
Trade Tim Hardaway for a 2016 2nd rounder

Trade our 2017 pick top 7 restricted to any team 19-27 who wants out and the player we want is there 6-4 PG Tyler Harvey


James Dolan

- Always willing to trade future first round picks in an aborted attempt to quick fix the team. These attempts are nearly always doomed to failure
- Always willing to absorb other team's contract/player problems and make them Knick problems. Usually these moves have long term repurcussions
- Always willing to give up on young developing players that the Knicks did formerly draft, whether they ultimately pan out or not, doesn't change the issue that a culture of jettisoning your young players from the draft ruins any chance to build a core and stability that veteran winning teams have as a baseline.
- Always willing to pay or overpay a veteran player, who will likely not move the needle for the team as a whole, short term or long term.

Briggs

- Like Dolan, wants to keep up the trend of dumping future first round draft picks. To gain a player in the back half of the draft. While some pan out, how many don't? All while projecting prospects future when most of the actual NBA front offices wait until at least the NCAA tournament is over to try to balance out potential draft day value.

- Like Dolan, wants to take other team's contract/player problems. If the Knicks were lucky enough to win the lottery and get Okafor, how does putting him through even one year of headcase JaVale McGee help him? ( And yet again, only happens in a trade that Denver never makes, last time Briggs said Denver would give up Nurkic and a first to get out of McGees last year, now it's just one first rounder. Is that supposed to be seen as progress towards objective reality?)

- Like Dolan, wants to dump young drafted players, because they don't instantly produce, but yet believes mass acquiring THREE rookies at once will all produce, one in Okafor he claims will absolutely produce at a historic and HOF level, and that the other two will not bust at all and absolutely be stone cold locks for building a contender.

- Like Dolan, wants to open up the check book for a veteran who won't make a difference if this team was constructed ( You want him to roll with a team with three rookies and JaVale McGee and produce at his current clip?) But I guess it would be Dolan like to spend 60 million on a team president who uses a complex offensive system that negates the need for a ball dominant point guard, spend another 25 in a coach to teach it, then load up big money on point guards in Dragic and Calderon combined, at the brutal cost of not helping other parts of the roster.

Anyone ever know someone in high school who had an opportunity? I knew someone who did well and got a full scholarship offer plus room and board. They rejected it because they thought their high school relationship would go somewhere. With someone who was in a band. How do you think that turned out?

The high schooler who takes that scholarship, the longer road, goes to college, works hard, tries to lay groundwork for the future, it's not fast, it's not sexy, but it's trying to build something that lasts. It's not neon lights like hooking up with the next lead singer for the Beatles. Or saying you ditched a full college ride for a shot in the dark.

Briggs, your version of things would be for that kid to set that scholarship on fire then be a roadie/groupie for the band, while working some minimum wage dead end jobs on the side. Dolan thinks that way, which is why he's failed at everything except he was fortunate to be saved by his pops money. Quick fix, reactionary, taking the long shot and short cut.

I suppose my version is less cinematic. Take the scholarship. Pay the hard road now. Hope you establish a foundation even if it's not the sexiest looking option to start.

Thanks for keeping the spirit of Dolan here Briggs, as we ring in the New Year, I salute your continued homage to the Sure Shot himself.

TT, I really enjoy reading your post. You are the most spot on out all the bible posters :-)

so here is what phil is thinking ....
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

1/1/2015  8:08 PM
Briggs let me ask you a straight up question.
What if we don't get a top 3 pick?
The Future is Bright!
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/1/2015  8:12 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Its pretty simple

Its nearly impossible to acquire quality BIGS in free agency. This draft year is "unique" with many 4-5's of value that will run up and down the first round. We are almost assured a great player up top--MUCH more to see but Im confident of a high value return with this high draft asset.


Use our secondary cap space(I believe up to 13.5mm) our 2018 pick(top 7 restricted) to go "all in" on this draft. My goal is three 1's and a 2.

Simply outspend either Phoenix for Dragic(my choice #1)Milwaukee for Knight or Chicago for Butler. Realistic Dragic but also a great option


I need EVERY single dollar I can get to work this--that is why I "would" waive Calderon. we NEED his 4.5mm we need it badly. IF I could pull off an additional pick in the 10-15 range using that cap space to find synergy with our top pick--we expedite rebuilding by 1.5 years.


Plan B is to have maximum flexibility in 2016 to take run at KD. I believe if we have all the Ducks in place New york becomes a destination for him.

Fck this 6 yr rebuilding BS talk. That is talk of a negative nelly. Ten toes in--all in aggression to be better immediately


It's not that simple Briggs

You want to -

1) Guarantee the Knicks will win the next draft lottery.
2) That the player you want, Okafor, will instantly produce at a HOF and historic level for a rookie
3) Jettison future draft assets, take in bad contracts/problem players, and push out the door current young Knicks players still in their developmental window plus overspending on the most recent "hottest name" on the market ( All actions the Knicks have made over and over again the last 10 years and has crippled this team into the hell it exists in now)
4) Push for trade that other teams will simply not make, the only way these trades could happen in a real NBA market environment is if you had collusion or completely eliminate the non Knicks front office's sense of basic self preservation.
5) Attempt to lure in Kevin Durant, from a potential contender, and then again from his hometown team, to play for a team, for less money, to increase his chances to not ever get a ring in his prime playing years.
6) Take shot in the dark grabs at late first round picks and 2nds, if you could acquire them, ignoring the Knicks are barren of assets, where historically finding rotation players, much less core ones, has a dismal return rate.
7) Dump existing players for cap space, before he's played even a full season on this team, for a small amount of cap space considering the cap will grow, even with a smoothing option, somewhere in the neighborhood of `16-18 million a year at full steam.

Your "plan" would require about 80 different thing to go right for the Knicks, against all odds, and line up in a row.

When has a quick fix attempt truly worked in pro sports? I mean a pure sacrifice everything for the future for everything now situation truly panned out to build a legacy of success and winning across time for that franchise? Not just the NBA, but also the NFL, MLB and the NHL? I'm not talking a one year one off playoff run but a long standing sense of continuity and development by a franchise?

Briggs, you defy practical NBA market conditions, you defy recent and long standing NBA history, you defy almost everything laid out in front of you simply because you don't agree with it. But the rest of us are "negative nellys" and "patently absurd" and deserve to have you tell us to "shut up" because we don't buy into your two year reboot vision of your Knicks?


"Fck this 6 yr rebuilding BS talk"

Nope, you don't sound like James Dolan at all. Not at all.

Briggs is not really a numbers man. Just calls it how he sees it.

I have seen him post many wild things and about almost every college can't miss.

Yet, he does not post real metrics nor does he seem to take them into account.

Triangle thinking at its best ...

Enough with the Rumsfeld experience factors and lets get some braniac's in here who are not so full of themselves.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

1/2/2015  1:02 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/2/2015  9:35 AM
I kinda like where we are. Just gotta get Melo ample rest the rest of the way and keep tanking away this lost season and put ourselves in the best possible spot for the lottery.

A lot of different ways we can go with the rebuild. I mean suppose we either lose out or pass on one of these top bigs in the draft and went for Emmanuel Mudiay instead:

5 - Sign DeAndre Jordan/re-sign Cole Aldrich
4 - JyMychal Green/Lavoy Allen/Richard Howell
3 - Melo/Early(Quincy Miller?)/Thanasis
2 - Elliot Williams/THJ/JR Smith
1 - Mudiay/Bryce Cotton/Calderon/Prigioni

Call me nuts--a little unorthodox but I could really get into that club.

• DeAndre Jordan would be the big FA signing. Something in the $10-15mm range. Dude's a top-3 NBA rebounder and shot-blocker. Basically a better, more-impactful version of Tyson Chandler. Only 26 years old.

• JaMychal Green is a starting PF in the NBA without question. Sign him to a 2 or 3-yr deal. 6'9" 235, athletic and very skilled. Every time I see this guy play I think of Antonio McDyess. Easily 15 & 10 a night in the pros with a starting role and enough touches, probably more. He's young and he'd come cheap. I bet SA thinks they have this guy in the bag for next year -- I'd swoop in right now outta nowhere, sign him for the rest of the year, establishing an immediate relationship with him, and then offer him a fair contract for a player with his experience (ready to outbid SA if necessary) along with offering him a starting role.

• Re-sign Cole Aldrich. No-brainer for the money it'll take. We'll have early Bird rights which should help in case there's any competition for his services (which I doubt -- there wasn't any this past off-season and he finished strong last year).

• Sign Lavoy Allen. Reminds me of Kurt Thomas. Upgrade over Jason Smith. Probably an upgrade over Amar'e at this point as well. Underrated. Could even see some time at C.

• Sign Rich Howell. Reserve PF in the DeJuan Blair mold. Quality depth -- could be useful and would come dirt cheap. Upgrade over Acy who I've been disappointed with. Westchester selected Howell in the DL expansion draft so obviously the Knicks have their eye on him.

• Elliot Williams looks healthy and is ripping up the DL right now. He can score and is actually good enough to handle and facilitate for stretches at a time.

• Mudiay's a big, talented PG that may have to go through some growing pains but should only get better and better starting day 1. The talent's there. Floor is a useful rotation guard right away, ceiling is a top NBA PG maybe even by year 2.

• Bryce Cotton's a little small at 6', but he can play. He's cat-quick with the ball, a very capable outside shooter, a good enough distributor and he can get to the rim with ease whenever he wants to. Could be a nice change-of-pace guard off the bench. A much better, more-aggressive version of Shane Larkin. Something close to Patty Mills maybe. I could see this guy on the floor at the same time with the 6'5" Mudiay.

We'd be adding a considerable amount of talent very quietly, get a lot younger in the process and address a host of team needs (rebounding would be greatly enhanced--we'd be hands down one of the best rebounding teams in the league; we'd be adding legit rim protection with Jordan and to a lesser degree with Aldrich and Green; we'd be adding a legit underrated post scorer in Green who can also knock down jumpers consistently all the way out to 3-pt territory; we'd be adding excellent frontcourt depth in Allen/Aldrich/Howell; we incorporate Early and Thanasis--Thanasis could be our new shutdown defender at several positions--maybe we make a decision to move forward with the 6'10" Quincy Miller over Early for some better outside shooting; and we'd be upgrading the backcourt significantly with guys like Mudiay, Elliot Williams and Bryce Cotton. Most importantly we'd be keeping costs down as much as possible. Jordan would be the main FA signing, a guy we could expect 10/13/2.5 out of every night who's not even a max player. Money should then be left over for Lavoy Allen and then all the other low-cost additions. Hopefully there will then be enough cap space available for 2016 to add more. JR and Prigs will be off the books by then and maybe Calderon could be stretched to allow even more cap room like some of you have suggested. Not terrible.

earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
1/2/2015  8:35 AM
yellowboy90 wrote:Phil just traded away Tyson CHandler why would he bring in the knock off version?

Great point. Hard to imagine we had a pretty nice center already. That said, we have a chance at Okafor now. With a healthy Chandler, we have no chance.

I would prefer to draft Okafor and move Melo. If we don't get a game changing player in the draft, then let Phil to his work only via FA. But we have a chance at someone special this year.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
Would anyone settle for this offseason

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy