[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The straight man...Jason Smith..
Author Thread
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
10/15/2014  2:34 PM
dodger78 wrote:The guy out at the 4 spot right now quite honestly if you take the preseason games is Amare.
Start Smith with Bargs and Acy as Backups... then Smith and Bargs can get minutes at the 5 as well...
Stoudamire is out...
PG Rotation... Obviously Calderon, then Prigs and Larkin depending on the game.
Shump looking good so far!

How is Bargs ahead of Amare? he played one game, amare is playing within the system.

Would love the logic...are we basing on last year? Even then it's Amare.

Just wondering, and not because I think you are wrong, just want to be shown the light.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
AUTOADVERT
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
10/15/2014  2:39 PM
Right.
Bargnani won't play at all

Amare will run and gun with the 2nd unit in his final days as a KNICK until his knees give out.

Acy & Jason will be bigger factors unless the team is down by a ton of points then you might put Amare in

babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
10/15/2014  2:43 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Right.
Bargnani won't play at all

Amare will run and gun with the 2nd unit in his final days as a KNICK until his knees give out.

Acy & Jason will be bigger factors unless the team is down by a ton of points then you might put Amare in

I'm down with that...like i said, i like what I saw last night in pre-season against the worst team in the NBA from ACY and Jason Smith.

I see Smith as a 5, so not too concerned about his impact on Amare, if anything I see them playing well together (like the 4th quarter last night).

I still need to see some definitive proof we are better off without Amare, before i say we are better off without Amare.

He looked good to me last night, just thought it was strange that Dodger78 had Bargs above Amare and Bargs hasn't even played this pre-season or half of last year...just seemed odd to me.

that's all.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

10/15/2014  2:52 PM
BRIGGS wrote:If Fischer doesnt start Smith at PF and he gives Acxy 30 minutes--we deserve to lose and he will be questionable as a coach right away in my book. Acy hs had a ice little sample--hes had more minutes than anyone else. He has not stood out--he plays hard and pretty well--bt he is no "Ken Farid' or even a poor mans Faried. Josef Nurkic a rookie had more rebounds in 19 minutes his first game than Acy has had in 4 games and well over 100 minutes of play.
Smith has shown he can rebound and score and imho he will do that at close to 50%. IF his body can go 32-33 minutes--than he should go. Bargs is a chemistry killer Smith will blend in and be effective--Bargs needs a new role off the bench. I dont know where Acy goes but I dont think u go from a reserve role on a 24 win team to a starting spot on a good team

Jason actually may not be a guy who can go 33 minutes a game over 82+ games. His value is commensurate to his consistent availability, thus I'd expect the staff to monitor his minutes and health very closely. He has not been durable before.

For that reason alone, I am looking at J.Smith as 15-25 minutes on any given night with the occasional plus 30 game. He is worth more to us as a whole season player than a broken mid-season player. I seriously doubt he can play more than this and stay healthy.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

10/15/2014  2:55 PM
babyKnicks wrote:
dodger78 wrote:The guy out at the 4 spot right now quite honestly if you take the preseason games is Amare.
Start Smith with Bargs and Acy as Backups... then Smith and Bargs can get minutes at the 5 as well...
Stoudamire is out...
PG Rotation... Obviously Calderon, then Prigs and Larkin depending on the game.
Shump looking good so far!

How is Bargs ahead of Amare? he played one game, amare is playing within the system.

Would love the logic...are we basing on last year? Even then it's Amare.

Just wondering, and not because I think you are wrong, just want to be shown the light.

Bargs may just fall off the map soon. Fish already alluded to the difficulty of evaluating Bargs role without him on the court. Choices will be made and Bargs may be left on the bench and only play again if someone gets hurt.

Does anyone wonder about how he never came back last season? I don't think that was a season ending injury and I always had a feeling the club just iced him for the year because even if he was available for the last 10-20 games, it just wasn't worth the bother.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
10/15/2014  2:58 PM
Splat wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:
dodger78 wrote:The guy out at the 4 spot right now quite honestly if you take the preseason games is Amare.
Start Smith with Bargs and Acy as Backups... then Smith and Bargs can get minutes at the 5 as well...
Stoudamire is out...
PG Rotation... Obviously Calderon, then Prigs and Larkin depending on the game.
Shump looking good so far!

How is Bargs ahead of Amare? he played one game, amare is playing within the system.

Would love the logic...are we basing on last year? Even then it's Amare.

Just wondering, and not because I think you are wrong, just want to be shown the light.

Bargs may just fall off the map soon. Fish already alluded to the difficulty of evaluating Bargs role without him on the court. Choices will be made and Bargs may be left on the bench and only play again if someone gets hurt.

Does anyone wonder about how he never came back last season? I don't think that was a season ending injury and I always had a feeling the club just iced him for the year because even if he was available for the last 10-20 games, it just wasn't worth the bother.

agreed, it was strange, BUT last year was strange all around, it was obvious everyone mailed it in...depressing actually, i think they were surprised Amare and JR were able to contribute as much as they could...old regime would have them traded together in the off season.

I bummed about bargs, i mean jason smith has a nice jumper, but bargs is pretty euro nifty out there. i was hoping he would be our Pau Gasol, but Jason Smith at a fraction of the cost appears to be that guy.

I know we are down on amare all the way back to the fire extinguisher in miami, but i'm telling you man, he's about to be our Horace Grant.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

10/15/2014  3:24 PM
babyKnicks wrote:
Splat wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:
dodger78 wrote:The guy out at the 4 spot right now quite honestly if you take the preseason games is Amare.
Start Smith with Bargs and Acy as Backups... then Smith and Bargs can get minutes at the 5 as well...
Stoudamire is out...
PG Rotation... Obviously Calderon, then Prigs and Larkin depending on the game.
Shump looking good so far!

How is Bargs ahead of Amare? he played one game, amare is playing within the system.

Would love the logic...are we basing on last year? Even then it's Amare.

Just wondering, and not because I think you are wrong, just want to be shown the light.

Bargs may just fall off the map soon. Fish already alluded to the difficulty of evaluating Bargs role without him on the court. Choices will be made and Bargs may be left on the bench and only play again if someone gets hurt.

Does anyone wonder about how he never came back last season? I don't think that was a season ending injury and I always had a feeling the club just iced him for the year because even if he was available for the last 10-20 games, it just wasn't worth the bother.

agreed, it was strange, BUT last year was strange all around, it was obvious everyone mailed it in...depressing actually, i think they were surprised Amare and JR were able to contribute as much as they could...old regime would have them traded together in the off season.

I bummed about bargs, i mean jason smith has a nice jumper, but bargs is pretty euro nifty out there. i was hoping he would be our Pau Gasol, but Jason Smith at a fraction of the cost appears to be that guy.

I know we are down on amare all the way back to the fire extinguisher in miami, but i'm telling you man, he's about to be our Horace Grant.

Horace Grant played defense, so .........., but if you notice already a shift on the board where some are thinking um, yeah, maybe Acy or Jason start and then you get more buzz about Amare on the 2nd unit. That sounds about right. I still do not think he will start, so if he is an active part of the rotation it looks like 2nd unit.

And if Larkin is featured before Pablo, we may be talking about something like:

Larkin
Stat
Timmy
Acy or Jason (depending on who starts as I think one of them probably will)
JR

That leaves Cole, Bargs, Early and Pablo as other possible players.

That kind of 2nd unit is basically a psycho squad. They could light it up for stretches or get completely lit up on the other end too. Scoring punch, but how consistent or logical a unit does one expect that to be?

This is why we may not see an emphasis on a 2nd unit fully subbing out the first unit, but partial subs and rotation mixing all game long. That second unit looks potentially hazardous.

Fish may look for a 2nd unit roster, but it may be hard to construct right now.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
10/15/2014  4:24 PM
Splat wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:If Fischer doesnt start Smith at PF and he gives Acxy 30 minutes--we deserve to lose and he will be questionable as a coach right away in my book. Acy hs had a ice little sample--hes had more minutes than anyone else. He has not stood out--he plays hard and pretty well--bt he is no "Ken Farid' or even a poor mans Faried. Josef Nurkic a rookie had more rebounds in 19 minutes his first game than Acy has had in 4 games and well over 100 minutes of play.
Smith has shown he can rebound and score and imho he will do that at close to 50%. IF his body can go 32-33 minutes--than he should go. Bargs is a chemistry killer Smith will blend in and be effective--Bargs needs a new role off the bench. I dont know where Acy goes but I dont think u go from a reserve role on a 24 win team to a starting spot on a good team

Jason actually may not be a guy who can go 33 minutes a game over 82+ games. His value is commensurate to his consistent availability, thus I'd expect the staff to monitor his minutes and health very closely. He has not been durable before.

For that reason alone, I am looking at J.Smith as 15-25 minutes on any given night with the occasional plus 30 game. He is worth more to us as a whole season player than a broken mid-season player. I seriously doubt he can play more than this and stay healthy.

Good point and limiting his minutes because of durability issues. Most are ready to pencil Jason Smith in as starter.

Acy will start

sorry Briggs

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
10/15/2014  4:26 PM
Splat wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:
dodger78 wrote:The guy out at the 4 spot right now quite honestly if you take the preseason games is Amare.
Start Smith with Bargs and Acy as Backups... then Smith and Bargs can get minutes at the 5 as well...
Stoudamire is out...
PG Rotation... Obviously Calderon, then Prigs and Larkin depending on the game.
Shump looking good so far!

How is Bargs ahead of Amare? he played one game, amare is playing within the system.

Would love the logic...are we basing on last year? Even then it's Amare.

Just wondering, and not because I think you are wrong, just want to be shown the light.

Bargs may just fall off the map soon. Fish already alluded to the difficulty of evaluating Bargs role without him on the court. Choices will be made and Bargs may be left on the bench and only play again if someone gets hurt.

Does anyone wonder about how he never came back last season? I don't think that was a season ending injury and I always had a feeling the club just iced him for the year because even if he was available for the last 10-20 games, it just wasn't worth the bother.

Exactly. The same will happen this year. The same will happen to Amare once he gets injured

They will be afterthoughts until they expire

babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
10/15/2014  4:37 PM
agreed, the second unit will not play as an entire unit, as we should be thinking about a playoff roster if we are talking rotations, however, I still feel the Amare will be part of a 4 big rotation and see a majority of the minutes of the bigs with maybe less than Dalembert.

You will see, no worries.

injuries are for suckas.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

10/15/2014  4:48 PM
babyKnicks wrote:agreed, the second unit will not play as an entire unit, as we should be thinking about a playoff roster if we are talking rotations, however, I still feel the Amare will be part of a 4 big rotation and see a majority of the minutes of the bigs with maybe less than Dalembert.

You will see, no worries.

injuries are for suckas.

Health maintenance is one reason this may be a deeper rotation. Look at our bigs. Sam, Jason and Stat are all guys who could play 15-25 minutes, but that may be it.

That leaves room for Acy too. It is why Amare can get minutes, though he will be curtailed still. If Bargs is just a spazz who couldn't come to camp in shape, then Stat benefits.

If we had two bigs who you could project playing 35 minutes, then I could see a 9-10 rotation. But our bigs will have their minutes spread so I think we go 11 and sometimes 12 deep as a result, at least until we are in the playoffs (assuming we are).

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
Dagger
Posts: 22065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2012
Member: #4184

10/15/2014  7:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/15/2014  7:52 PM
I don't know why people want to send Early to the d-league. He spent 4 years in college, that's enough time to develop his game in a basketball league below the pros. At this point it's just a question of whether or not he can adjust to the tempo of the nba, another year in the d-league (like a fifth year of college) will do little for him now.
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

10/15/2014  7:41 PM
Dagger wrote:I don't know why people want to send Early to the d-league. He spent 4 years in college, that's enough time to develop his game in a basketball league below the pros. At this point it's just a question of whether or not he can adjust to the tempo of the nba, another year in the d-league (like a fifth year of college) will do little for him at this point.

I don't see any indications that he won't be on the squad. He just may only get spot minutes in the first few months. Once the core players have got a better grasp of the system and are playing good defense, it becomes easier to work a player like Early into the mix. There is just so much going on during a total reboot like this, so Early just may be player 10-12 in the rotation for now. If he gets some DNPs, I wouldn't read into it too heavily. They are going to groom him provided he proves adaptable.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
dodger78
Posts: 20907
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/7/2002
Member: #250
Germany
10/16/2014  3:32 PM
babyKnicks wrote:
dodger78 wrote:The guy out at the 4 spot right now quite honestly if you take the preseason games is Amare.
Start Smith with Bargs and Acy as Backups... then Smith and Bargs can get minutes at the 5 as well...
Stoudamire is out...
PG Rotation... Obviously Calderon, then Prigs and Larkin depending on the game.
Shump looking good so far!

How is Bargs ahead of Amare? he played one game, amare is playing within the system.

Would love the logic...are we basing on last year? Even then it's Amare.

Just wondering, and not because I think you are wrong, just want to be shown the light.

Well Amare was not showing anything!!!! He played but did horrible!!!
He is not in the system (okay true its still early) but hes got no feel for the ball movement or finding the cutting guys!!! Thats his role in the triangle though... also i do not like him shooting ghe midrange j he is shaky...
Bargs has not played due to injury but has proven to me that he is the better shooter, better facilitator and better defender...

plus he is more legit as a center in a backup role...

well just my 5 cent!!!

Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

10/16/2014  3:43 PM
dodger78 wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:
dodger78 wrote:The guy out at the 4 spot right now quite honestly if you take the preseason games is Amare.
Start Smith with Bargs and Acy as Backups... then Smith and Bargs can get minutes at the 5 as well...
Stoudamire is out...
PG Rotation... Obviously Calderon, then Prigs and Larkin depending on the game.
Shump looking good so far!

How is Bargs ahead of Amare? he played one game, amare is playing within the system.

Would love the logic...are we basing on last year? Even then it's Amare.

Just wondering, and not because I think you are wrong, just want to be shown the light.

Well Amare was not showing anything!!!! He played but did horrible!!!
He is not in the system (okay true its still early) but hes got no feel for the ball movement or finding the cutting guys!!! Thats his role in the triangle though... also i do not like him shooting ghe midrange j he is shaky...
Bargs has not played due to injury but has proven to me that he is the better shooter, better facilitator and better defender...

plus he is more legit as a center in a backup role...

well just my 5 cent!!!

My 50 Cent

It is possible Bargs and Amare, or both, end up riding the pine, but until that happens, I don't want either to start.

As subs, I agree that Bargs is a better choice as a defender. Teams love to exploit Stat and Bargs does play decent man to man defense.

What we should remember is Bargs was an awful help defender and Woodson's approach was like poison for Bargs. In a more conventional man to man defense, Bargs is going to be OK as a defender.

Considering Bargs range, he may be able to function as a sub in this system decently, whereas Amare doesn't have a clue.

I think we should be way more concerned first about what defense either of these two provide than offense, since both can give you an extra 10+ points either way.

Early is the wildcard here IMO. If he gets spot minutes and lights it up, it could spell doom for Bargs and Stat's minutes. Whether Early can play a lick of D remains another question entirely. We'll see.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/16/2014  3:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/16/2014  3:58 PM
Splat wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:agreed, the second unit will not play as an entire unit, as we should be thinking about a playoff roster if we are talking rotations, however, I still feel the Amare will be part of a 4 big rotation and see a majority of the minutes of the bigs with maybe less than Dalembert.

You will see, no worries.

injuries are for suckas.

Health maintenance is one reason this may be a deeper rotation. Look at our bigs. Sam, Jason and Stat are all guys who could play 15-25 minutes, but that may be it.

That leaves room for Acy too. It is why Amare can get minutes, though he will be curtailed still. If Bargs is just a spazz who couldn't come to camp in shape, then Stat benefits.

If we had two bigs who you could project playing 35 minutes, then I could see a 9-10 rotation. But our bigs will have their minutes spread so I think we go 11 and sometimes 12 deep as a result, at least until we are in the playoffs (assuming we are).

Ah, if D Rose and B lopez are going all out--then J Smith can gives us 28-30 minutes for 75 games. We can use strategic days off--we have the depth but I really believe that J Smith gives us a true mobile 4 who can score 20 points on a given night(his avg would likely be 12-13 imho) while grabbing 7-8 boards and giving is that 7 footer length on D. Quincy Acy lets see him guard guys like Dirk or Ryan Andersen etc at 6-5. I actually thought Quincy Acyw was a decent player and I think he has potential as an energy big off the bench--but thrusting him into a starting role? It will be one week before he goes 1-6 with 4 rebounds and 3 TO's and we lose by 18 before we rethink that one.

RIP Crushalot😞
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/16/2014  4:09 PM
Jason is flexible between PF and C. I also think Bargs is the same way. Both are capable of catch and shoot on a high level from mid range. There's no way both don't play if healthy. It's a good thing to have more bigs given the injury history of many of them. IMO they are interchangeable, very similar players. Having Acy as an option only makes the team more versatile. We should be able to match up with any team defensively given the different bigs we have.
fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/16/2014  4:24 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Splat wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:agreed, the second unit will not play as an entire unit, as we should be thinking about a playoff roster if we are talking rotations, however, I still feel the Amare will be part of a 4 big rotation and see a majority of the minutes of the bigs with maybe less than Dalembert.

You will see, no worries.

injuries are for suckas.

Health maintenance is one reason this may be a deeper rotation. Look at our bigs. Sam, Jason and Stat are all guys who could play 15-25 minutes, but that may be it.

That leaves room for Acy too. It is why Amare can get minutes, though he will be curtailed still. If Bargs is just a spazz who couldn't come to camp in shape, then Stat benefits.

If we had two bigs who you could project playing 35 minutes, then I could see a 9-10 rotation. But our bigs will have their minutes spread so I think we go 11 and sometimes 12 deep as a result, at least until we are in the playoffs (assuming we are).

Ah, if D Rose and B lopez are going all out--then J Smith can gives us 28-30 minutes for 75 games. We can use strategic days off--we have the depth but I really believe that J Smith gives us a true mobile 4 who can score 20 points on a given night(his avg would likely be 12-13 imho) while grabbing 7-8 boards and giving is that 7 footer length on D. Quincy Acy lets see him guard guys like Dirk or Ryan Andersen etc at 6-5. I actually thought Quincy Acyw was a decent player and I think he has potential as an energy big off the bench--but thrusting him into a starting role? It will be one week before he goes 1-6 with 4 rebounds and 3 TO's and we lose by 18 before we rethink that one.

I think lost in the euphoria of the triangle and having a team run by Phil instead of Dolan and CAA stooges people arent really looking at the talent on the roster. It might fit better, and I still think barring major injuries to Melo and Calderon that this team is + .500 and probably good for 45 wins (my prediction) we are far far from elite.

Briggs nailed it with "firepower" -we lack it

Doesnt mean we are bad team. I think we can be good and hope we are, but we are probably 6-8 seed and if in the west would be a lottery team. Time will tell

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/16/2014  4:43 PM
I think this team has plenty of firepower. We haven't really seen this team clicking on all cylinders yet. Melo, JR, Jose, THJ, STAT, Bargs, Jason can all score at a good level. With this system others will be helped to be more effective as well.
My take is that this team is going to be very hard to defend for 48 minutes due to the player and ball movement being so constant. The key is if the D remains this engaged and in fact improves this team is going to be a big surprise this year. I predicted 50 wins and I'm still expecting this team to get to that level.
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

10/16/2014  4:56 PM
The fate of this season's squad is going to depend more on them overachieving on defense. The points will be generated if they play Triangulally, but most victories will be gotten from playing D.
I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
The straight man...Jason Smith..

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy