[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

for this team to do well
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
8/8/2014  8:49 AM
Toronto will come back down to earth. Nets will miss the playoffs
AUTOADVERT
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
8/8/2014  8:51 AM
I had the Knicks at 44-38 but since I'm picking them to finish 5th gotta bump them up to 45-37
Nalod
Posts: 71363
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/8/2014  10:32 AM
We won't really know until Barkley tells us!!!
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

8/8/2014  10:51 AM
Our biggest obstacle will be getting this team through the first half with a decent record. It will take the first half for this new team to come together kinda like it did for J.Kidd and the Nets last year. When you put a bunch of new players and a new coaching crew with a new system together it takes time to develop so the first half is huge for us.
1-Clev
1a-Bulls
3-Wizards
4-Heat (I hate that they'll be good again)
5-Hornets (Do not sleep on this team)
6-Raptors
7-Atlanta
8-Knicks/Nets/Pacers
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/24/2012
Member: #3997

8/10/2014  9:35 PM
BRIGGS wrote:We need the froncourt players to stay relatively healthy and for Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres
We need the three intermediate wings Iman Shumpert THJ and J R Smith to be at their best and make nightly impacts JR can do it he's proven he can. The others need to prove
We need to reduce PT on Melo but still expect 23-24 points with 4-5 assists and 6-7 rebounds.
The PG group needs to help facilitate and make their shots--Larkin can be a spark athletic PG type off the bench.

Things I think the Knicks need to do to be successful ( in relative terms and playing winning basketball )

1) The Knicks need to be more efficient shooting free throws. If you can squeeze out 3-5 more free throws a night that you formerly would miss as team, that's huge across the bottom line and across an entire season. A lot of free throw shooting is mental, but a lot of it is just putting in the time and work to improve. The Knicks might have issues with raw talent in some areas, but they should never ever get beat for raw effort.

2) The Knicks need to limit their turnovers. Again, even shaving 2-3 turnovers a night against their typical average will reap huge benefits across a game and across a season. Those kind of situations are literally point swings ( i.e. a four or five point turnaround potential when you don't surrender a fast break layup but instead work efficiently and use that possession to take a high percentage shot)

3)The Knicks need to commit to winning the offensive rebounding battle each and every night. Again, some of this is a talent issue, but again, some of it is purely an effort issue. How badly do you want it? Look at Patrick Beverley of the Rockets, not the most talented guy in the league, but he wants it, he will bleed for it, he will fight for it each night, he will never give up, never surrender and no matter the score, he will keep coming at you, Terminator style, until you relent or shoot him in the head. Offensive rebounds means second chances, more opportunities, putting pressure on the other teams D, causing havoc and putting yourself in a good position to take high percentage 2nd and 3rd shot chances.

4) The Knicks must play their rookies and young players. The only way Hardaway Jr, Shumpert, Early, Aldrich, Larkin and Older Antelope are going to get better is if you give them minutes. You have to commit to eating their growing pains.

5) The Knicks need to commit to leaving Bargnani to rot on the bench. He will only be taking minutes away from more efficient or younger players and he offers very little upside. He won't even give you six hard fouls off the bench as a big.

6) Like the Spurs, the Knicks need to be a league leader in number of passes before shot attempts per game and across the season. When you don't have superior talent, you can help yourself with good ball movement. Basic Basketball 101, if you have more than one guy who is ball dominant as a dribbler, your offense is going to suck. Watching Melo and/or JR Smith burn 10 seconds off the shot clock and take 9-12 dribbles before a shot jack is not efficiency. If you can't find a good shot and/or not open, in a couple of dribbles, keep the ball moving.

7) The Knicks should aspire to having 6-7-8 guys scoring in double digits each night. Having a couple of 20 point plus scorers each night isn't as efficient as having 8 guys with 10-12 points each. Having a lot of guys in low double digits in scoring means you are passing the ball, moving the ball, looking for the open man and the high percentage shot.

High percentage shots = Maximizing possessions

Winning teams make every single possession count.

8) The Knicks should aspire to have every single one of their better three point shooters to shoot X percentage above league average as a goal. Every single good three point shooter should be getting open corner three looks during a game based on good team play and high percentage shots and passing. The focal point of the offense needs to run not through Melo as an iso/hero ball option, but through trying to get open three point looks. Hit enough triples and you can compete with anyone in the NBA.

9) The Knicks should aspire to be near the top of the league in transition defense. The Knicks are not suited to defend the rim nor are they suited for basic half court playoff style defense. However transition defense is, again, a lot about raw effort. Danny Green is not the most talented guy in the NBA, but just on raw hard work and sheer desire and determination, his plus transition defense helped hurt the Heat enough to push the Spurs over the top in that category. Doing the "little things" go a big way towards winning.

10) JR Smith is the teams best hope for a talented two way player who can produce at an All Star level. At some point, the guy needs to buy in and buy in hard for playing team ball, improved shot selection and committing to defense. The talent has always been there, but the kid needs to get his head right and buy in to the team concept.

11) The Knicks need to rebuild Iman Shumpert as a player and as a future potential asset, either for the team long term or as a trade piece. The kid is a good defender and has a good defensive mindset. He's too young and too talented not to have hope that a new regime can tap into his potential and give him a chance to produce.

12) The Knicks need a practical team defense and system that does a better job of hiding the players individual liabilities. The constant switching and wave of double teaming just doesn't work. In that regard, the team needs Dalembert to really step up and commit to anchoring a thankless job of holding the pivot down and sacrificing offense for defensive intensity and output.

The Knicks need a swift kick in the butt about some basic fundamental basketball. Solid team ball can help you win games. Even if you aren't winning games, good solid team ball and strong fundamentals keep you competitive and moving in the right direction.

H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

8/10/2014  10:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/10/2014  10:07 PM
Let's face it, the 2014-2015 roster is much closer to the lottery team from last year than it is to a team that will be a top eastern conference playoff team. We lost Tyson, got some yoots, and traded Felton for Calderon. A small uptick in wins shouldn't be too surprising. But that's not the point really this is a transitional season anyway.

If the Knicks do well next season, awesome, that means they have some talent that was heretofore misused hadn't blossomed or was not developed properly.

If they Knicks don't do well next season, awesome, that means we get to add a lottery pick to Melo, and 20 million in cap space.

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30167
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
8/10/2014  11:02 PM
H1AND1 wrote:Let's face it, the 2014-2015 roster is much closer to the lottery team from last year than it is to a team that will be a top eastern conference playoff team. We lost Tyson, got some yoots, and traded Felton for Calderon. A small uptick in wins shouldn't be too surprising. But that's not the point really this is a transitional season anyway.

If the Knicks do well next season, awesome, that means they have some talent that was heretofore misused hadn't blossomed or was not developed properly.

If they Knicks don't do well next season, awesome, that means we get to add a lottery pick to Melo, and 20 million in cap space.

The thing to take away from this season is how Melo and Jr look in the triangle. If they look phenomenal then the rest will take care of itself regardless of how the season turned out.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/10/2014  11:25 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:Let's face it, the 2014-2015 roster is much closer to the lottery team from last year than it is to a team that will be a top eastern conference playoff team. We lost Tyson, got some yoots, and traded Felton for Calderon. A small uptick in wins shouldn't be too surprising. But that's not the point really this is a transitional season anyway.

If the Knicks do well next season, awesome, that means they have some talent that was heretofore misused hadn't blossomed or was not developed properly.

If they Knicks don't do well next season, awesome, that means we get to add a lottery pick to Melo, and 20 million in cap space.

The thing to take away from this season is how Melo and Jr look in the triangle. If they look phenomenal then the rest will take care of itself regardless of how the season turned out.

I agree. I think JR is staying and that Phil sees him as a part of the future. I don't think that is the case for Shump, Amare, Bargs and possibly Pablo. The guys on the Melo weekend with Melo and Houston, Larkin, JR, Early, and Hardaway Jr. are the guys I think Phil sees as being on the team in the future. Calderon, Acy and one of the centers probably are in that group as well.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
8/11/2014  3:05 AM
Orlando is my sleeper

With their additions and developments core if healthy

Elfrid Payton as a sleeper ROY candidate if they make some noise and play well this season

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

8/11/2014  11:44 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/11/2014  12:48 PM
H1AND1 wrote:Let's face it, the 2014-2015 roster is much closer to the lottery team from last year than it is to a team that will be a top eastern conference playoff team. We lost Tyson, got some yoots, and traded Felton for Calderon. A small uptick in wins shouldn't be too surprising. But that's not the point really this is a transitional season anyway.

If the Knicks do well next season, awesome, that means they have some talent that was heretofore misused hadn't blossomed or was not developed properly.

If they Knicks don't do well next season, awesome, that means we get to add a lottery pick to Melo, and 20 million in cap space.

Totally agree. That's exactly how I'm looking at this coming season and next off-season. We're not winning a championship this year (I believe Melo even said as much recently: http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/08/09/carmelo-anthony-i-do-not-expect-to-win-a-championship-this-year/) and come next year, the roster will be different once again as quite a few of these guys most likely won't be around after the year. This is why I'm not feeling guys like Bargs, Pablo, Outlaw, even Amar'e who I've always liked. They're not part of the "next phase" -- they're part of the here and now and the here and now, unfortunately, isn't good enough to win anything significant imo. We need to keep building...I'd much rather see guys like Acy, Early, Larkin, Aldrich, THJ, etc. all get substantial development time this year. Same reason I also wouldn't mind a couple of more moves for some youth -- would at least like to see one more younger PG added to the roster in Prigioni's place. Maybe we look to make a small deal to bring back an Ian Clark or a Nick Calathes (Memphis may agree to something like this -- Calathes may still be serving a few games of his 20-game drug suspension from last yr -- I know they signed Udrih last yr to replace Calathes and still have Beno in the fold. Maybe they'd rather hit the ground running with 3 PGs in Conley/Udrih/Prigioni rather than wait on Calathes. We start of with Calderon/Larkin and wait for Calathes to make it back)...Or maybe we agree to deal Pablo for even less than that (a future 2nd round pick? A trade exception?) and go out and just sign a cheap alternative with upside (Seth Curry, Kalin Lucas). Wiping Pablo's salary off the books for next yr as well as bringing in a younger alternative with more upside is something that's favorable on 2 fronts -- if there's one more move to make before we begin, this might be it.

Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

8/14/2014  9:25 AM
BRIGGS wrote:We need the froncourt players to stay relatively healthy and for Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres
We need the three intermediate wings Iman Shumpert THJ and J R Smith to be at their best and make nightly impacts JR can do it he's proven he can. The others need to prove
We need to reduce PT on Melo but still expect 23-24 points with 4-5 assists and 6-7 rebounds.
The PG group needs to help facilitate and make their shots--Larkin can be a spark athletic PG type off the bench.

Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres, wouldnt both have to defend centers then? Is there minutes for that? I'm still trying to figure out how the Knicks can give both of these guys 20+ minutes and still field a team that can win. Im not sure thats possible

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

8/14/2014  9:49 AM
Jmpasq wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:We need the froncourt players to stay relatively healthy and for Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres
We need the three intermediate wings Iman Shumpert THJ and J R Smith to be at their best and make nightly impacts JR can do it he's proven he can. The others need to prove
We need to reduce PT on Melo but still expect 23-24 points with 4-5 assists and 6-7 rebounds.
The PG group needs to help facilitate and make their shots--Larkin can be a spark athletic PG type off the bench.

Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres, wouldnt both have to defend centers then? Is there minutes for that? I'm still trying to figure out how the Knicks can give both of these guys 20+ minutes and still field a team that can win. Im not sure thats possible

Bargs has been a net negative his entire career, even the seasons he scored 20+ PPG. Im not holding my breath and he should get 0 minutes per game barring a Zen master induced miracle on the court.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/14/2014  10:39 AM
H1AND1 wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:We need the froncourt players to stay relatively healthy and for Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres
We need the three intermediate wings Iman Shumpert THJ and J R Smith to be at their best and make nightly impacts JR can do it he's proven he can. The others need to prove
We need to reduce PT on Melo but still expect 23-24 points with 4-5 assists and 6-7 rebounds.
The PG group needs to help facilitate and make their shots--Larkin can be a spark athletic PG type off the bench.

Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres, wouldnt both have to defend centers then? Is there minutes for that? I'm still trying to figure out how the Knicks can give both of these guys 20+ minutes and still field a team that can win. Im not sure thats possible

Bargs has been a net negative his entire career, even the seasons he scored 20+ PPG. Im not holding my breath and he should get 0 minutes per game barring a Zen master induced miracle on the court.


Seems to me that the way you make i work is to have a solid defensive player on the court with Amar'e or Bargs. You don't want to put them on the court at the same time. Bargs/Jason or Amar'e/Dalembert can work. The best minutes Bargs had were with KMart and one lineup with just him and with Shump at SF with JR. It only shows that it's possible for a coach to find a lineup that works with Bargs in it.


3 C. Anthony | A. Bargnani | R. Felton | K. Martin | I. Shumpert 145:51 +7.0
6 C. Anthony | A. Bargnani | R. Felton | I. Shumpert | J. Smith 126:11 +10.8
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
8/14/2014  1:18 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/14/2014  1:22 PM
nixluva wrote:
H1AND1 wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:We need the froncourt players to stay relatively healthy and for Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres
We need the three intermediate wings Iman Shumpert THJ and J R Smith to be at their best and make nightly impacts JR can do it he's proven he can. The others need to prove
We need to reduce PT on Melo but still expect 23-24 points with 4-5 assists and 6-7 rebounds.
The PG group needs to help facilitate and make their shots--Larkin can be a spark athletic PG type off the bench.

Bargs and Amare to score well/yet also defend their positions the best they have in their careres, wouldnt both have to defend centers then? Is there minutes for that? I'm still trying to figure out how the Knicks can give both of these guys 20+ minutes and still field a team that can win. Im not sure thats possible

Bargs has been a net negative his entire career, even the seasons he scored 20+ PPG. Im not holding my breath and he should get 0 minutes per game barring a Zen master induced miracle on the court.


Seems to me that the way you make i work is to have a solid defensive player on the court with Amar'e or Bargs. You don't want to put them on the court at the same time. Bargs/Jason or Amar'e/Dalembert can work. The best minutes Bargs had were with KMart and one lineup with just him and with Shump at SF with JR. It only shows that it's possible for a coach to find a lineup that works with Bargs in it.


3 C. Anthony | A. Bargnani | R. Felton | K. Martin | I. Shumpert 145:51 +7.0
6 C. Anthony | A. Bargnani | R. Felton | I. Shumpert | J. Smith 126:11 +10.8

both show AB at Center and NOT PF
Which I always believed he was best utilized at C and useless at PF without an athletic/mobile/versatile BIG


ONE showing CA at PF and NOT SF
While I believe PF was his best position, he may prove me wrong with this weight loss

and

ACCEPT a system/role and willingless TO CHANGE HIS WAYS

ONE showing Kmart
Kmart is the PF, PF/C that is mobile/athletic (still despite his age and is a good 1v1 defender but undersized, though a good help defender, and a under rated PnR player and PASSER

Now go back to the chicken and egg, can we play with a C that cannot rebound with consistency
and/or
CA at PF when he is not a shot blocker, horrible HELP defender/ average 1v1 defender at best when committed
When at SF, he lacks the quickness to defend shooters, and even worse on talents that could shoot and penetrate off the drible, hoping his weight loss changes this

I don't care whether it is on DEF or OFF, it should never be played upon 1-2 or even just 3 players, it is a losing recipe
ALL 5 players must be threats on both ends, especially on DEF, though one may be weaker

However, on OFF, 3 players can be used to

INITIATE an OFFENSE, as the other 2 are FILL INS/ROLE PLAYERS, PLAYING off the other 3 talents, THUS THE TRIANGLE
We don't have a SHAQ, Jordan, Pippen, or even Kobe, DOMINANT scorers that can score in high % shots with consistency to initiate our OFFENSE
While CA can have great games, he is far from "DOMINCANT"

The ability to play ON and OFF the ball are both needed on these roles, with the ability/willingless to read the opponents DEF and attack together, as well as recoginzing the more favoritable match ups

RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
8/14/2014  1:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/14/2014  1:32 PM
NOTES...

Even when Phil Jackson had a YOUNG and DOMINANT Duo of SHAQ and KOBE
He required a couple of years of them learning how to play effectively together in the system along with collecting talent/role players as their core continued to improve and develop leaders on and off the court, LOCKER ROOM as well

Can't remember and get confused with the Shaq and Gasol/Bynum era

Ron Harper
Horry
Fisher

Their PF's from

AC Green, Chris Mihmn, Kwame Brown, and some 1/2 year wonders

Odom

Walton
Shannon Brown

Pau Gasol
Bynum
Ariza

ramtour420
Posts: 26309
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
8/14/2014  1:29 PM
I will paraphrase the Zen Master here. He had said this while discussing what they needed to win a tough playoff matchup ( spurs maybe) a few years ago. He said that we need to be better than the other team 5 feet and closer to the basket. That's it. It's that simple. That means IMHO rebounding, help d, and making sure the chippies go in.
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
TheGame
Posts: 26637
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
8/14/2014  1:37 PM
The Knicks should finish 6-8, with 7 seed being the most likely end result. I think we will finish second in the Atlantic behind Toronto.

This team will be better than people think.

Trust the Process
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
8/14/2014  4:07 PM
I have the Knicks ranked as possibly the 1-3 seed. I don't think that much separates the top teams Bulls, Cavs and Heat. If I were to rank the teams:

1. Bulls (Depends on Rose's being healthy)
2. Cavs (Inexperience factor is still there like it or not)
3. Knicks (This depends on which Knicks players show up ones from last year or the year before last year)
4. Heat (This ranking is also based on Wade's health)
5. Raptors (Up and coming team who may build on last year or could take a step back)
6. Wizards (Same as Raptors)
7. Nets (Still have a decent core of Williams, Johnson and Lopez, still a deep team)
8. Hornets (like the Raps and Wiz they could build on last year or take a step back)

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/14/2014  4:17 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Toronto will come back down to earth. Nets will miss the playoffs

we're winning the division.

H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

8/14/2014  4:26 PM
Vmart wrote:I have the Knicks ranked as possibly the 1-3 seed. I don't think that much separates the top teams Bulls, Cavs and Heat. If I were to rank the teams:

1. Bulls (Depends on Rose's being healthy)
2. Cavs (Inexperience factor is still there like it or not)
3. Knicks (This depends on which Knicks players show up ones from last year or the year before last year)
4. Heat (This ranking is also based on Wade's health)
5. Raptors (Up and coming team who may build on last year or could take a step back)
6. Wizards (Same as Raptors)
7. Nets (Still have a decent core of Williams, Johnson and Lopez, still a deep team)
8. Hornets (like the Raps and Wiz they could build on last year or take a step back)

You have the Hornets too low. Lance added to an already top defense plus he gives them another scorer on offense. Hornets will be in the top 5, I'm pretty sure.

for this team to do well

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy