[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Josh Smith and dez Knicks
Author Thread
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/30/2014  11:08 PM
EnySpree wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:We don't need overpaid one dimensional players. This isn't complicated.

yeah but that doesn't describe Josh Smith. He's not over paid and he isn't one dimensional....that would be Tyson Chandler. Josh actually makes slightly less that Tyson. He also is a stat stuffer. He can score, rebound, pass, defend, put the ball on the floor, block shots, run the floor, jump out the gym, and he can shoot it out to the three if he needs to....so if you don't like him that's fine, but don't state things that aren't facts just to sound cool.

Only thing bad about Josh is bad is his attitude. He had some really good showings in Atlanta and he elevates his game in the playoffs. He still does have that attitude problem I will agree to that

+1

AUTOADVERT
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/30/2014  11:11 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:He signed a 4 yr/54 mil deal. So basically he has 3 yrs and 40.5 mil owed to him. Not sure I love the deal at those dollars, but if we lost Melo I think I'd be in on this deal. If we could trade Melo for Harden I'd definitely be in. Kings are probably offering Ben McLemore and Jason Thompson. What's a better offer for Detroit? I don't know.

But anyway my conclusion is I don't love how he pairs with Melo and if we signed Melo that's again a lot of $$ committed. If we move Melo I think he works a lot better and would be a great pair with someone like Harden.


Looking at Detroit's 3-point FG% from last year, I'd say that they'd prefer McLemore over Shump. Josh is a good passer with a decent post game. I wouldn't be against the deal. I think I'd prefer the Knicks going after Greg Monroe instead.

Why not both as a 4-5 combo?

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/30/2014  11:16 PM
VDesai wrote:He signed a 4 yr/54 mil deal. So basically he has 3 yrs and 40.5 mil owed to him. Not sure I love the deal at those dollars, but if we lost Melo I think I'd be in on this deal. If we could trade Melo for Harden I'd definitely be in. Kings are probably offering Ben McLemore and Jason Thompson. What's a better offer for Detroit? I don't know.

But anyway my conclusion is I don't love how he pairs with Melo and if we signed Melo that's again a lot of $$ committed. If we move Melo I think he works a lot better and would be a great pair with someone like Harden.

Melo makes up for all of Smith's flaws (inability to space the floor or carry a team offensively) and Smith makes up for all of Melo's flaws (ability to defend multiple positions and overall defense; plus an ability to push the ball on the break off a rebound). Why don't you think they'd fit in well with one another?

Also, I've heard that the rumored deal between the Kings and Pistons is Derrick Williams and Jason Thompson for Smith, not McLemore.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/30/2014  11:20 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/1/2014  12:17 AM
EnySpree wrote:Shump gets to mess his career up in an new city, and Bargs comes off the books after this year.....just saying

I wouldn't give up Shumpert (and Bargs) for him but I do like the idea of trading for him. Maybe we could even get away with playing him at the 5. There is precedent for playing 6"10 centers in recent history with Amare, Diaw and Horford which shouldn't expose us defensively considering the lack of scoring, physical big men (aside from Brook Lopez and Marc Gasol). Offensively, he could use his speed advantages, to exploit the bigger and slower-footed 5's in the league ala Amare. That would nullify his inability to space the floor and put him closer to the basket, where he has been pretty efficient around.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39942
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/30/2014  11:30 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:He signed a 4 yr/54 mil deal. So basically he has 3 yrs and 40.5 mil owed to him. Not sure I love the deal at those dollars, but if we lost Melo I think I'd be in on this deal. If we could trade Melo for Harden I'd definitely be in. Kings are probably offering Ben McLemore and Jason Thompson. What's a better offer for Detroit? I don't know.

But anyway my conclusion is I don't love how he pairs with Melo and if we signed Melo that's again a lot of $$ committed. If we move Melo I think he works a lot better and would be a great pair with someone like Harden.


Looking at Detroit's 3-point FG% from last year, I'd say that they'd prefer McLemore over Shump. Josh is a good passer with a decent post game. I wouldn't be against the deal. I think I'd prefer the Knicks going after Greg Monroe instead.

Why not both as a 4-5 combo?


I don't think we could afford both and I'm convinced Monroe is a 4 who should play spot minutes at 5.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/30/2014  11:43 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/1/2014  12:18 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:He signed a 4 yr/54 mil deal. So basically he has 3 yrs and 40.5 mil owed to him. Not sure I love the deal at those dollars, but if we lost Melo I think I'd be in on this deal. If we could trade Melo for Harden I'd definitely be in. Kings are probably offering Ben McLemore and Jason Thompson. What's a better offer for Detroit? I don't know.

But anyway my conclusion is I don't love how he pairs with Melo and if we signed Melo that's again a lot of $$ committed. If we move Melo I think he works a lot better and would be a great pair with someone like Harden.


Looking at Detroit's 3-point FG% from last year, I'd say that they'd prefer McLemore over Shump. Josh is a good passer with a decent post game. I wouldn't be against the deal. I think I'd prefer the Knicks going after Greg Monroe instead.

Why not both as a 4-5 combo?


I don't think we could afford both and I'm convinced Monroe is a 4 who should play spot minutes at 5.

Yeah Monroe's game is a bit odd but that's what I like about him. In the past, successful role/complimentary players in the triangle generally fit that mold. For instance Dennis Rodman was a dude that was a farcry from a prototypical PF at 6"6' but he made it work, covering 2's, 3's and 4's. I'm not suggesting that either Smith or Monroe are that good but they are the atypical types that have worked well in the system. Because of that, I'd love to see a frontcourt featuring Melo, Smith and Monroe with no particular emphasis on who plays what position.

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30166
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
7/1/2014  5:50 AM
EnySpree wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
EnySpree wrote:He actually had a nice run in Atl....he goes to Detroit to get paid and then took the year off.

Josh Smith for Bargnani and Shump....would you do that ****?

Josh
Melo
Dalembert
Calderon
Jr Smith

bench Amare, Larkin, Cleanthony, THJr, Jeremy Tyler

Not sure how the chemistry works, but on paper the knicks would be balanced on offense and defense....You factor in better coaching and leadership. This team could run the floor well. On defense everyone can guard their man...Josh and Sam would clean up a lot of mistakes. Rebounding would improve. A lot of capable passers, cutters and finishers.

Gamble much? yes....Josh Smith wants to be a star. I think his focus would change playing with Melo and underneath Fisher and Phil.

No, his value is very low due to his long contract, you could probably get him just as a salary dump if you wanted him no need to give up Shump in this deal. His contract is to long for the risk. If he doesn't pan out then you would be stuck with him. If he only had 2 yrs left on his deal then he would be worth the shot.

I also don't think he took a year off, in the NBA you win with defense, ball movement and spacing. With Monroe, Drummond & Smith there is no spacing. All teams need to do is pack the paint and force Detroit to shoot 3s which doesn't maximize his skills.

Josh Smith needs to be in a situation where he can attack the rim constantly or his teammates make opponents pay by knocking down 3s. Problem is Josh Smith is a Forward yet his best abilities are what you want out of your power forward/center. So to accommodate him you need a center that can knock down long range shots. If he lines up at SF then the PF also needs to be able to knock down long range shots.

we're running the triangle next year remember? We wouldn't have to custom mke the roster around him. We just have to install guys into the system and press play. Passing and cutting....He's tailor made for the triangle because of his versatility.

Attacking the rim is Woodson ball...the triangle creates opportunities to slip to the basket on cuts and passing. You are describing ISO ball....we won't be doing that anymore

When I say him attacking the rim doesn't mean giving him the ball on an Iso and letting him attack the rim. I was thinking more toward pick and rolls, and cuts to the basket, put backs on offensive rebounds, fastbreaks.

If Phil was coaching I would be more open to it, but we can't afford to risk him not working out and being stuck with his contract.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Josh Smith and dez Knicks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy