meloshouldgo wrote:

NardDogNation wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:If they are focused on p.j. hairiston I don't think they are taking it seriously.

+1. I like the idea of getting a first round pick but I don't like the idea of PJ Hairston. I don't think he'll be much more than a Maurice Evans or Keith Bogans type. I much rather have Spencer Dinwiddie. The guy seems like a perfect fit for the triangle and I wouldn't be surprised if the PJ Hairston hype is a smokescreen.

I have a feeling Phil Jackson has a better handle on what fits the triangle than we do.

There are a lot of red flags that come up with Hairston. He has character issues and there are questions about his motivation/motor. I think Phil might be hoping that his issues cause him to drop to the second round like a Van Exel or Stephenson. He is a great second round pick but I am not sure that he is a guy you target in the first round. I am hoping that the Knicks can somehow get Ennis.

CrushAlot wrote:

meloshouldgo wrote:

NardDogNation wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:If they are focused on p.j. hairiston I don't think they are taking it seriously.

+1. I like the idea of getting a first round pick but I don't like the idea of PJ Hairston. I don't think he'll be much more than a Maurice Evans or Keith Bogans type. I much rather have Spencer Dinwiddie. The guy seems like a perfect fit for the triangle and I wouldn't be surprised if the PJ Hairston hype is a smokescreen.

I have a feeling Phil Jackson has a better handle on what fits the triangle than we do.

There are a lot of red flags that come up with Hairston. He has character issues and there are questions about his motivation/motor. I think Phil might be hoping that his issues cause him to drop to the second round like a Van Exel or Stephenson. He is a great second round pick but I am not sure that he is a guy you target in the first round. I am hoping that the Knicks can somehow get Ennis.

Ennis is another guy who they are serious about and i think they would pick him over hairston if he is available

martin wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

meloshouldgo wrote:

NardDogNation wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:If they are focused on p.j. hairiston I don't think they are taking it seriously.

+1. I like the idea of getting a first round pick but I don't like the idea of PJ Hairston. I don't think he'll be much more than a Maurice Evans or Keith Bogans type. I much rather have Spencer Dinwiddie. The guy seems like a perfect fit for the triangle and I wouldn't be surprised if the PJ Hairston hype is a smokescreen.

I have a feeling Phil Jackson has a better handle on what fits the triangle than we do.

There are a lot of red flags that come up with Hairston. He has character issues and there are questions about his motivation/motor. I think Phil might be hoping that his issues cause him to drop to the second round like a Van Exel or Stephenson. He is a great second round pick but I am not sure that he is a guy you target in the first round. I am hoping that the Knicks can somehow get Ennis.

Ennis is another guy who they are serious about and i think they would pick him over hairston if he is available

Agreed, especially considering NY's PG rotation and the fact that Shump, JR, and Hardaway are on roster

Good Point martin. Our pg situation needs to be resolved either this summer or next summer if we are gonna compete faster