saw the loss coming, and i could practically care less about the sport nowadays, and i used to love the old 90's teams. was fun to watch here and there, although i sometimes hate aspects of hockey with all the dumping of the puck, error-ish play often due to play so fast you can't tell wtf is going on. it's fluid but too much so and probably too crowded, if you ask me.
either way this game seemed very intense from when i decided to catch a bit of the 3rd and some of the first ot before i went out.
rangers were being dominated though, and only saved, pun intended, by lundqvist's amazing performance. the kings had the puck on the rangers' side or threatening their side from at least that point on it seemed.
they had one great chance that i saw with the power play in the first ot, but other than that they never looked like they would win late (i missed the rest of the first ot and the 2nd).
sorry to hate, but since hockey is mostly a cold climate/north american working class/rural/suburban white people's sport, with sprinkles of europeans it's audience has shrunk and why the rangers are not as popular in the city as they used to be with the changes to demographics to nyc over the years. they did really well and i am glad for them to make it this far. but...the knicks are much more important to the city...although that is potentially challenged by the nets long term...
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...