[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Maybe Shump should be the point guard
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

5/23/2014  7:50 PM
Anyway.....I wanted Shump traded just a few months ago and I was really passionate about it. That's until Phil came her talking about the triangle. Now I can see his roll and how things can fold into place for us. We don't need a point if we run the triangle.

Don't sleep on Phil. This is just a theory. Phil already had his plan but if he is going to do this Shump at the point makes a ton of sense.

Jr Smith if he had his head on straight is a fantastic ball handler and passer. Melo can handle and pass as well when given the opportunity. In the triangle he will have no choice but to move the ball. He'll still get his points but he will get them a whole lot easier until he needs to take over.

Amare will get alot of dunks and layups as well as the triangle opens alot of angles for him to operate.

Stop complaining as see the concepts for what it is and how this can really work for us.

Phil still needs to add players but I think that he will more likely need to bring in role guys to be antagonists and do the dirty work and protect everyone.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
Dagger
Posts: 22065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2012
Member: #4184

5/23/2014  8:01 PM
Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39941
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/23/2014  8:07 PM
Dagger wrote:Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team.

Forget the team. He's not long for the league if he doesn't show improvement. The NBDL and Europe is littered with 6'4" to 6'7" guys with good athleticism who weren't able to put it together in the NBA. This is a huge year for Shump regardless of who the new coach is.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
5/23/2014  8:08 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
Dagger wrote:Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team.

Forget the team. He's not long for the league if he doesn't show improvement. The NBDL and Europe is littered with 6'4" to 6'7" guys with good athleticism who weren't able to put it together in the NBA. This is a huge year for Shump regardless of who the new coach is.

he deserves a real shot and i hope he gets it.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

5/23/2014  9:43 PM
Shump just looks like a guy that will never reach his potential. I think he would seriously struggle to stay on the floor on any good team in this league. His defense is regressing badly, he is timid with the ball, and his shooting is erratic. He seriously needs a tutor/mentor because all MDA/Woody have done is told him to jack up 3's. At this point, he doesn't really do anything well. I like him but I've kinda given up hope on him.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
5/23/2014  9:51 PM
dk7th wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Dagger wrote:Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team.

Forget the team. He's not long for the league if he doesn't show improvement. The NBDL and Europe is littered with 6'4" to 6'7" guys with good athleticism who weren't able to put it together in the NBA. This is a huge year for Shump regardless of who the new coach is.

he deserves a real shot and i hope he gets it.

Real shot?
Shump has been given everything on a silver platter. Starting job again and again. Problem with Shump goes beyond basketball. He lacks mental toughness, his skill level is being held back by bigger issues, issues that stem from his Injury. He needs to get over his injury.

Get back in the gym and comeback with better attitude and mentally strong. If he pulls the crap he pulled this year he won't be a Knick to long.

93BUICK
Posts: 22281
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/6/2006
Member: #1175
USA
5/23/2014  10:38 PM
He could do it but not without training discipline and inspired teaching- I think Derek Fisher could train him-
If you are still following the team and reading sites like this, there is nothing, short of your own demise, that is going to throw you off this train.
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
5/23/2014  10:58 PM
Vmart wrote:
dk7th wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Dagger wrote:Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team.

Forget the team. He's not long for the league if he doesn't show improvement. The NBDL and Europe is littered with 6'4" to 6'7" guys with good athleticism who weren't able to put it together in the NBA. This is a huge year for Shump regardless of who the new coach is.

he deserves a real shot and i hope he gets it.

Real shot?
Shump has been given everything on a silver platter. Starting job again and again. Problem with Shump goes beyond basketball. He lacks mental toughness, his skill level is being held back by bigger issues, issues that stem from his Injury. He needs to get over his injury.

Get back in the gym and comeback with better attitude and mentally strong. If he pulls the crap he pulled this year he won't be a Knick to long.

his best season was his first playing for mike d'antoni in a system.

since that time the franchise has pretty much meandered while failing to cohere into something resembling a pro team.

"silver platter" have you actually been following this farce?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/23/2014  11:30 PM
dk7th wrote:
Vmart wrote:
dk7th wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Dagger wrote:Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team.

Forget the team. He's not long for the league if he doesn't show improvement. The NBDL and Europe is littered with 6'4" to 6'7" guys with good athleticism who weren't able to put it together in the NBA. This is a huge year for Shump regardless of who the new coach is.

he deserves a real shot and i hope he gets it.

Real shot?
Shump has been given everything on a silver platter. Starting job again and again. Problem with Shump goes beyond basketball. He lacks mental toughness, his skill level is being held back by bigger issues, issues that stem from his Injury. He needs to get over his injury.

Get back in the gym and comeback with better attitude and mentally strong. If he pulls the crap he pulled this year he won't be a Knick to long.

his best season was his first playing for mike d'antoni in a system.

since that time the franchise has pretty much meandered while failing to cohere into something resembling a pro team.

"silver platter" have you actually been following this farce?

Shump has played in a 192 nba games but his salad days were the first 42 games of his nba career when the team was 6 games under .500 and didn't look like it had a chance of making the playoffs? From Shump's scouting report on draftnet:
Weaknesses: Lacks stability/discipline on the court ... Inconsistent … Not efficient at all ... Horrid shot-selection ... Liable to shoot at any time, even when being closely guarded ... Likes to shoot off the dribble on a good deal of his isolation possessions, despite only connecting on 20% of these attempts ... Shoots nearly 5 three pointers per game, despite only shooting 27.8% from behind the arc ... Will often go for the flashy play instead of the easy play, which can lead to unforced turnovers ... Very poor jump shooter, and hasn't shown any improvement in this area during his three-year career with Georgia Tech ... Needs the ball in his hands a lot to be effective on offense and he certainly won't have as many isolation opportunities at the next level ... Should look to take advantage of his size and strength more in the post, but has yet to add this dimension to his game ... Attitude has been questioned in the past, but to his credit he appears to have matured over the past year ...

Overall: Shumpert has rare physical tools for a guard on any level of basketball ... His defense should get him on an NBA roster and possibly into a rotation, but his poor basketball IQ will certainly hurt his effectiveness ... Should be an early-mid second round pick this year ...


http://nbadraft.net/players/iman-shumpert
Three years in and most of the faults pointed out are still very evident in his game.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/23/2014  11:43 PM
dk7th wrote:
Vmart wrote:
dk7th wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Dagger wrote:Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team.

Forget the team. He's not long for the league if he doesn't show improvement. The NBDL and Europe is littered with 6'4" to 6'7" guys with good athleticism who weren't able to put it together in the NBA. This is a huge year for Shump regardless of who the new coach is.

he deserves a real shot and i hope he gets it.

Real shot?
Shump has been given everything on a silver platter. Starting job again and again. Problem with Shump goes beyond basketball. He lacks mental toughness, his skill level is being held back by bigger issues, issues that stem from his Injury. He needs to get over his injury.

Get back in the gym and comeback with better attitude and mentally strong. If he pulls the crap he pulled this year he won't be a Knick to long.

his best season was his first playing for mike d'antoni in a system.

since that time the franchise has pretty much meandered while failing to cohere into something resembling a pro team.

"silver platter" have you actually been following this farce?

If that is his best season then the guy really sucks. Also, his best season was his second year which is still sad. Each year he wasted time. The first year he was wasted trying to be a point and the second year he was coming of injury, and his third year he wasted time sulking.

The one thing he has done is improve his rebounding every year which is something Phil will like.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39941
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/24/2014  12:37 AM
yellowboy90 wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Vmart wrote:
dk7th wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Dagger wrote:Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team.

Forget the team. He's not long for the league if he doesn't show improvement. The NBDL and Europe is littered with 6'4" to 6'7" guys with good athleticism who weren't able to put it together in the NBA. This is a huge year for Shump regardless of who the new coach is.

he deserves a real shot and i hope he gets it.

Real shot?
Shump has been given everything on a silver platter. Starting job again and again. Problem with Shump goes beyond basketball. He lacks mental toughness, his skill level is being held back by bigger issues, issues that stem from his Injury. He needs to get over his injury.

Get back in the gym and comeback with better attitude and mentally strong. If he pulls the crap he pulled this year he won't be a Knick to long.

his best season was his first playing for mike d'antoni in a system.

since that time the franchise has pretty much meandered while failing to cohere into something resembling a pro team.

"silver platter" have you actually been following this farce?

If that is his best season then the guy really sucks. Also, his best season was his second year which is still sad. Each year he wasted time. The first year he was wasted trying to be a point and the second year he was coming of injury, and his third year he wasted time sulking.

The one thing he has done is improve his rebounding every year which is something Phil will like.


Iman's stats are starting to look a lot like "Air" Pete Meyers. Meyer got more assists, but Shump is a better three point shooter. I bring this up because Pete was able to carve out a decent role as a starter in the triangle offense. That team also had Kukoc and Pippen, who were above average passers. They also had Armstrong, who did a decent job of staying in front of the quicker point guards in the league.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/24/2014  12:57 AM
Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can.

IMO what is more important is a Point Forward in this system. Having other guys who can handle the ball is very key. I think that's why PJax is checking out a player like Odom. Forwards that can handle and pass are very useful to the Triangle. It's good to have big defensive Guards in the game and that's what Harper gave them. They played without a prototypical PG.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/24/2014  1:16 AM
nixluva wrote:Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can.

IMO what is more important is a Point Forward in this system. Having other guys who can handle the ball is very key. I think that's why PJax is checking out a player like Odom. Forwards that can handle and pass are very useful to the Triangle. It's good to have big defensive Guards in the game and that's what Harper gave them. They played without a prototypical PG.


Reports are that back in January the Knicks and PJax were negotiating roles/terms and Phil said he wouldn't coach. Shump would have been traded at the deadline if he didn't get hurt. I know Phil wants Felton gone but if he was a big Shump guy would he be in play at the deadline.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/24/2014  1:38 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can.

IMO what is more important is a Point Forward in this system. Having other guys who can handle the ball is very key. I think that's why PJax is checking out a player like Odom. Forwards that can handle and pass are very useful to the Triangle. It's good to have big defensive Guards in the game and that's what Harper gave them. They played without a prototypical PG.


Reports are that back in January the Knicks and PJax were negotiating roles/terms and Phil said he wouldn't coach. Shump would have been traded at the deadline if he didn't get hurt. I know Phil wants Felton gone but if he was a big Shump guy would he be in play at the deadline.

There's no way to know when Phil made his thoughts clear to Dolan and if that had any impact on Shump not being traded. That injury wouldn't really stop a trade IMO. In any event it seems to me that for defensive purposes Shump is a good fit. This offense hides his weaknesses. In the past Phil had guys like Pippen and Kukoc who could move the ball like a PG. Again tho if you watch the video you can see how they played when Jordan was on the bench and they stuck to the Triangle pretty hard. It was all ball and player movement and getting wide open shots from 3. Hard cuts off the pass. Great spacing.
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
5/24/2014  5:27 AM
Ron Harper actually sacrificed alot of his game when he came to the Bulls as well, as he was a 20 point scorer with the Clippers the year before Chicago down to single digits with the Bulls. Not sure how that relates to Shump as Ron harper was a much better player than Shump.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/24/2014  6:16 AM
Shumpert would also average 20 on that clipper team
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
5/24/2014  7:13 AM
Shumpert wouldn't average 20 in the Dleauge.

I see Ron Harper being thrown, Ron Harpers Guard skills were light years better than Shumpert. Shumperts guard skills offensively are below average at best, it's down right disrespectful to Ron Harper to compare the two.

If the other team saw our backcourt was Shumps and THjr, would we ever start our offense with more then 12 seconds on the clock??? How many steals would Priggy have if he could Shumps for a game full court when ever he wanted??? What about Beverly.....Avery,Toney Allen,Paul george. There is no Pippen or Kukoc or Jordan or Kobe on this team, how much faith do you have in Shumpert bring that ball up just 50% of time???

"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

5/24/2014  7:24 AM
nixluva wrote:Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can.

IMO what is more important is a Point Forward in this system. Having other guys who can handle the ball is very key. I think that's why PJax is checking out a player like Odom. Forwards that can handle and pass are very useful to the Triangle. It's good to have big defensive Guards in the game and that's what Harper gave them. They played without a prototypical PG.

I dont think I ever disagreed with you, ever

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/24/2014  8:11 AM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can.

IMO what is more important is a Point Forward in this system. Having other guys who can handle the ball is very key. I think that's why PJax is checking out a player like Odom. Forwards that can handle and pass are very useful to the Triangle. It's good to have big defensive Guards in the game and that's what Harper gave them. They played without a prototypical PG.


Reports are that back in January the Knicks and PJax were negotiating roles/terms and Phil said he wouldn't coach. Shump would have been traded at the deadline if he didn't get hurt. I know Phil wants Felton gone but if he was a big Shump guy would he be in play at the deadline.

There's no way to know when Phil made his thoughts clear to Dolan and if that had any impact on Shump not being traded. That injury wouldn't really stop a trade IMO. In any event it seems to me that for defensive purposes Shump is a good fit. This offense hides his weaknesses. In the past Phil had guys like Pippen and Kukoc who could move the ball like a PG. Again tho if you watch the video you can see how they played when Jordan was on the bench and they stuck to the Triangle pretty hard. It was all ball and player movement and getting wide open shots from 3. Hard cuts off the pass. Great spacing.
The ny times reported that negotiations between Phil and the Knicks were going on behind the scenes and that Phil informed the Knicks that he would not coach the team back in January.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

5/24/2014  9:21 AM

CrushAlot wrote:

Shump has played in a 192 nba games but his salad days were the first 42 games of his nba career when the team was 6 games under .500 and didn't look like it had a chance of making the playoffs? From Shump's scouting report on draftnet:

Weaknesses: Lacks stability/discipline on the court ... Inconsistent … Not efficient at all ... Horrid shot-selection ... Liable to shoot at any time, even when being closely guarded ... Likes to shoot off the dribble on a good deal of his isolation possessions, despite only connecting on 20% of these attempts ... Shoots nearly 5 three pointers per game, despite only shooting 27.8% from behind the arc ... Will often go for the flashy play instead of the easy play, which can lead to unforced turnovers ... Very poor jump shooter, and hasn't shown any improvement in this area during his three-year career with Georgia Tech ... Needs the ball in his hands a lot to be effective on offense and he certainly won't have as many isolation opportunities at the next level ... Should look to take advantage of his size and strength more in the post, but has yet to add this dimension to his game ... Attitude has been questioned in the past, but to his credit he appears to have matured over the past year ...

Overall: Shumpert has rare physical tools for a guard on any level of basketball ... His defense should get him on an NBA roster and possibly into a rotation, but his poor basketball IQ will certainly hurt his effectiveness ... Should be an early-mid second round pick this year ...

http://nbadraft.net/players/iman-shumpert
Three years in and most of the faults pointed out are still very evident in his game.

Yup, its almost like reading a review of his pro game. I agree with those who say its a make or break year for Shump. Knee or no knee, it amazes me that he still cant consistently get to the rim with his athletic ability, or know when to shoot, pass, or drive. I believe he will be around the league for a few years, but if Iman's game doesn't improve he is going to find himself further and further down the bench.

I still believe Shump could be a top flight SG if he applied himself and was as passionate about improving his game as he is about his image.

Maybe Shump should be the point guard

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy