Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() dk7th wrote:Shump has played in a 192 nba games but his salad days were the first 42 games of his nba career when the team was 6 games under .500 and didn't look like it had a chance of making the playoffs? From Shump's scouting report on draftnet:Vmart wrote:dk7th wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Dagger wrote:Shump is just not a good player, used to like him, but it seems he can't do much of anything. Can't handle the ball, no court vision, can't finish around the rim, can't shoot anymore. He's a decent rebounder and an alright on-ball defender which makes him a bottom of the rotation guy. I can only hope he looks more like his second year next season, otherwise he's not long for this team. Weaknesses: Lacks stability/discipline on the court ... Inconsistent … Not efficient at all ... Horrid shot-selection ... Liable to shoot at any time, even when being closely guarded ... Likes to shoot off the dribble on a good deal of his isolation possessions, despite only connecting on 20% of these attempts ... Shoots nearly 5 three pointers per game, despite only shooting 27.8% from behind the arc ... Will often go for the flashy play instead of the easy play, which can lead to unforced turnovers ... Very poor jump shooter, and hasn't shown any improvement in this area during his three-year career with Georgia Tech ... Needs the ball in his hands a lot to be effective on offense and he certainly won't have as many isolation opportunities at the next level ... Should look to take advantage of his size and strength more in the post, but has yet to add this dimension to his game ... Attitude has been questioned in the past, but to his credit he appears to have matured over the past year ... http://nbadraft.net/players/iman-shumpert Three years in and most of the faults pointed out are still very evident in his game. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() nixluva wrote:Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can. Reports are that back in January the Knicks and PJax were negotiating roles/terms and Phil said he wouldn't coach. Shump would have been traded at the deadline if he didn't get hurt. I know Phil wants Felton gone but if he was a big Shump guy would he be in play at the deadline. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can. There's no way to know when Phil made his thoughts clear to Dolan and if that had any impact on Shump not being traded. That injury wouldn't really stop a trade IMO. In any event it seems to me that for defensive purposes Shump is a good fit. This offense hides his weaknesses. In the past Phil had guys like Pippen and Kukoc who could move the ball like a PG. Again tho if you watch the video you can see how they played when Jordan was on the bench and they stuck to the Triangle pretty hard. It was all ball and player movement and getting wide open shots from 3. Hard cuts off the pass. Great spacing. |
knickscity
Posts: 24533 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/2/2012 Member: #4241 USA |
![]() Ron Harper actually sacrificed alot of his game when he came to the Bulls as well, as he was a 20 point scorer with the Clippers the year before Chicago down to single digits with the Bulls. Not sure how that relates to Shump as Ron harper was a much better player than Shump.
|
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
![]() Shumpert would also average 20 on that clipper team
|
Anji
Posts: 25523 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 4/14/2006 Member: #1122 USA |
![]() Shumpert wouldn't average 20 in the Dleauge.
I see Ron Harper being thrown, Ron Harpers Guard skills were light years better than Shumpert. Shumperts guard skills offensively are below average at best, it's down right disrespectful to Ron Harper to compare the two. If the other team saw our backcourt was Shumps and THjr, would we ever start our offense with more then 12 seconds on the clock??? How many steals would Priggy have if he could Shumps for a game full court when ever he wanted??? What about Beverly.....Avery,Toney Allen,Paul george. There is no Pippen or Kukoc or Jordan or Kobe on this team, how much faith do you have in Shumpert bring that ball up just 50% of time??? "Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
|
EnySpree
Posts: 44919 Alba Posts: 138 Joined: 4/18/2003 Member: #397 |
![]() nixluva wrote:Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can. I dont think I ever disagreed with you, ever Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast
https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC
https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() nixluva wrote:The ny times reported that negotiations between Phil and the Knicks were going on behind the scenes and that Phil informed the Knicks that he would not coach the team back in January.CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:Once again i'm reading a lot of what he did and not a lot of what the OP is talking about in terms of how Shump would fit into a Triangle system. No matter how many times it's pointed out with clarity that the Triangle isn't in need of a Ball Dominant PG with great court vision, still guys don't get it. As I pointed out many times, if Ron Harper could play point then Shump can. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
![]()
Yup, its almost like reading a review of his pro game. I agree with those who say its a make or break year for Shump. Knee or no knee, it amazes me that he still cant consistently get to the rim with his athletic ability, or know when to shoot, pass, or drive. I believe he will be around the league for a few years, but if Iman's game doesn't improve he is going to find himself further and further down the bench. I still believe Shump could be a top flight SG if he applied himself and was as passionate about improving his game as he is about his image. |