DrAlphaeus wrote:NardDogNation wrote:DrAlphaeus wrote:Hmm:Zeke gets here Dec. 2003. Ariza picked up in 2004 draft. Jamal gets here in a trade from Chicago in Aug. 2004 for Mutumbo et al. Frye, Lee & Nate picked up in 2005 draft. Good start.
Eddy Curry and his heart defect gets here Oct. 2005 using picks that became Joakim Noah and LaMarcus Aldridge.
Anucha Browne Sanders is fired in January 2006.
Ariza was traded with Penny for Stevie Franchise in Feb. 2006.
Knicks finished 2005-06 second to last in the league with the league's highest payroll.
But then Stevie & Frye was traded for Zach in June 2007.
Isiah & MSG are found liable for sexual harassment in Oct. 2007.
Donnie Walsh is brought in April 2008 and Isiah looms in the shadows until… who knows when exactly.
Postscript: Zach and Jamal both traded Nov. 2008, with that date still a UK forum record.
So what I think is Isiah wants to be remembered as a savvy scout of talent, but wants us to forget about his massive failure Eddy Curry and his otherwise reprehensible behavior.
Isiah may be a douche but that has nothing to do with the topic of conversation I.e. his basketball operations resume. Yes, he had the Eddy Curry debacle but outside of that, what move could you really consider a failure from a talent/value perspective?
I'll always say he was a good draft scout. But he shouldn't have done more than that.
But if you believe that the prez of ops is in charge of the culture, it seems his mismanagement on other levels had a direct impact on basketball.
I forgot to add he was there when they brought on Marbury Jan. '04. I thought good things were coming back then as well. Knicks make playoffs, but after slow start Wilkens resigns next season. Old fashioned coach loses the ears of the young guys. Sounds familiar. Herb, Larry, Allan Houston's contract… not saying he had it easy. But Steve Francis? Jerome James? Vin Baker? Trading Crazy Eyes for Ray-J's brother-in-law for a million more a year? (That may just be nostalgia talking but something to be said about crafty vets in the mix, and his other centers were busts). Coddling/enabling Marbury? Maybe the core got good simply because they were depended on so much and got so many minutes in losing efforts, it was some sort of crucible. I dunno. But the 06-07 & 07-08 teams he coached he got 33 & 23 wins, respectively. So he can say "I wish" all he wants but I wish he wasn't a failure as a manager.
I didn't say the guy was perfect. Even the best of GM's trade for Richard Jefferson (Spurs) or draft Michael Beasley. Isiah had his bumps along the way but were any of them insurmountable or fatal?
Vin Baker was a former, and recent all-star when we signed him to a minimum deal. Was that going to destroy the franchise? Did that set us back a number of years?
We gave up no assets to get Jerome James, who was one of only a handful of centers that averaged a double-double in the playoffs. Did that handicap a team that was well over the cap already, for the next several years?
Kurt Thomas was 33 years old when we traded him for a 24 year old Quentin Richardson, who was regarded as one of the best up-and-coming guards in the league, and a draft pick used to select Nate Robinson. Was Isiah suppose to know that his back was going to start acting up and impede his ability to perform the way he did just one season earlier with the Suns and two seasons earlier with the Clippers?
Sometimes **** happens and moves don't work out but that does not mean they should not have been made. The reality is that every NBA transaction involves risk, no matter how astute the reasoning is involved in making them.
I also don't buy the "culture" argument, against Isiah. JFK was ordering interns to blow his aides in the swimming pool of the White House and he is still widely credited (rightfully so) for bringing out the best of the nation, being a champion of FDR's policies/program and having one of the more effective administration's in our nation's history. MLK was also a renowned man-whore, while married WITH kids (as well as a probable homophobe) and was the driving force in introducing legislation that gave the overwhelming majority of Americans (white people too) a shot at living the American Dream. The point is that I don't think a leader's missteps or misgivings necessarily impact his effectiveness in a given capacity or impacts the performance/spirit of his subordinates.