nyk4ever wrote:we sure couldn't use a 24yo guard who goes 25pts/7ast/4reb on 54% shooting tonight. forget the money, the kid is a player, he'd instantly be the best guard we've had in some time.

kid is averaging 22/7/7 on 50% shooting over his last 5. i don't get how this is still a dispute. 11mm/year is a bargain for that kind of production

Agreed.

nyk4ever wrote:

VCoug wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:

VCoug wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:Evans is a bad player. The only chances that should be taken are on players who have produced in semi-limited roles that could be on the verge of breaking out with consistent minutes and not players who have consistently produce badly when given minutes.

Exactly. Evans has been a mediocre to bad player almost his entire career and 3 recent games won't change that. At best, he's a semi-effective 6th man for an already established team. He certainly isn't worth sacrificing future cap space for our ****ty team.

you never even responded to my post. im really not trying to goad you, but you attempted to call me out and i thought i actually gave you a well-reasoned response and you didn't even bother responding.

I was going to but I got a bunch of emails from work and had to take care of that and sort of forgot about it.

oh ok - that's kinda funny, because you sure talked a pretty tough game in your response to me. then you just "forgot" about it. i think the ignore button suits you.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯