StarksEwing1 wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:Hawks play the clips tonight. Hopefully the Knicks take care of business in Cleveland.

To be fair we know thr Knciks arent going anywhere. However i hope we finish strong at least so Denver doesnt end up with a good draft pick

Come on StarksEwing sing a long you know the words.

I am positive BUT I'm also realistic. Look i can pretty much guarantee that im one of teh most positive Knick fans there is. However i also try to eb fair/objective

CrushAlot wrote:Knicks have won 3 straight. Its on.

You know its not

CrushAlot wrote:

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:Knicks have won 3 straight. Its on.

You know its not

Hawks have lost 14/15 and play the clips tonight. You don't think the Knicks get the 8th seed?

Unfortunately, no.

Their PG is so awful that its not possible. Also, how often are we gonna get games like these from stat? He is bound to punch something or strain a nut or something.

And, they are still living and dying by the outside shots. Until the knicks are consistently willing to move the ball and take smart shots I have little confidence.

I also don't like that Melo plays so much better in the first half then the second half. Too many minutes? Gets more selfish? both? Idk just don't like it. Cleveland triple teamed him every time would like to see him burn that a bit more.

The interior D tonight was excellent. Their guards (mainly PG) were awful as usual giving up way too much penetration.

CrushAlot wrote:

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:Knicks have won 3 straight. Its on.

You know its not

Hawks have lost 14/15 and play the clips tonight. You don't think the Knicks get the 8th seed?

Unfortunately, no.

Their PG is so awful that its not possible. Also, how often are we gonna get games like these from stat? He is bound to punch something or strain a nut or something.

And, they are still living and dying by the outside shots. Until the knicks are consistently willing to move the ball and take smart shots I have little confidence.

I also don't like that Melo plays so much better in the first half then the second half. Too many minutes? Gets more selfish? both? Idk just don't like it. Cleveland triple teamed him every time would like to see him burn that a bit more.

The interior D tonight was excellent. Their guards (mainly PG) were awful as usual giving up way too much penetration.

I think you have to hope that Shump is back and that Stat can hold up. Also, Kenyon is out of his boot. Kenyon is the Knicks best big in my opinion. If he can come back that will be a huge boost. Have to wonder if the Knicks waive Clark or Brown to sign Bobby Brown when he comes back from china.

A jolt from a new PG would be great.

Shumps D was sick tonight.

VCoug wrote:

jrodmc wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:Jazz, Celtics, sixers, Bucks, Cavs. Knicks could have a nice run.

aaaannnddd what give you that impression?

One at a time (Copyright 2014 AnswerMan Industries, LLC)

the last sample size of one?
Hope springs eternal fellas. We shouldn't win any games, and that is exactly why we will win.

Thought for the day: 1999. All these years later, and we need to go through the same teams.
There be some happy ghosts in those rafters. Some of them even wearing Dolan's ties.

1999? You're joking, right? At what point during that season were we 18 games under .500 like we are now? The only point that season we were under .500 at all was when we lost the first 2 games of the season. Who's our current Ewing? Sprewell? Houston? Camby? JVG had his faults but he knew how to coach the **** out of defense. What the hell is Woodson good at? The only thing this team has in common with the 1999 team is Herb Williams.

You disrespect the memory of that team by comparing the two and any self-respecting Knicks fan would be ashamed of themselves for making the comparison.

You want a pissing match, at how many points in 1999 were we third in the division? My comparison is about just making the playoffs and no one expecting anything, not comparing records.
Who was your 1999 Melo? Who's our current Charlie Football? LJ?
Ewing? Patrick was at the tail end of his career and didn't even play for half the playoffs and barely finished the season. You seriously holding him up to a healthy double double Chandler right now?
Camby couldn't break the starting lineup behind Great GrandMaMa and the Krazy Eyes.
Woodson is good at getting to the playoffs. If he manages to coach this team to a spot this year, he apparently can do that much.

The memory of that team is "Now starting at center for your NBA Finals New York Knicks...Chris Dudley!" Thank you, JVG. Faults indeed.

Your self-respect would be better served by also being self-aware.

W/ Indy, they are still somewhat unproven and the Knicks, at the 8 seed, would basically be playing the series w/ no expectations. Although we will have to deal w/ "verticality"... Oh the verticality....

mreinman wrote:

sealy wrote:If they do get in I'd actually prefer Indy now, as opposed to the beginning of the yr when I thought we'd actually be good and matchup better w/ Miami.

W/ Indy, they are still somewhat unproven and the Knicks, at the 8 seed, would basically be playing the series w/ no expectations. Although we will have to deal w/ "verticality"... Oh the verticality....

I am sure that Tyson would prefer Indy as well.

He is currently trying to plan his next playoff boob injury

Missed the last 3 games because I was away, and I know he's been putting up nice numbers, but I cannot wait until he and his big contract are gone.

Just think Indy has a greater propensity to get tight in a first round than Miami. I honestly don't see the Knicks winning more than 2 games in the 1st rd.

jrodmc wrote:

VCoug wrote:

jrodmc wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:Jazz, Celtics, sixers, Bucks, Cavs. Knicks could have a nice run.

aaaannnddd what give you that impression?

One at a time (Copyright 2014 AnswerMan Industries, LLC)

the last sample size of one?
Hope springs eternal fellas. We shouldn't win any games, and that is exactly why we will win.

Thought for the day: 1999. All these years later, and we need to go through the same teams.
There be some happy ghosts in those rafters. Some of them even wearing Dolan's ties.

1999? You're joking, right? At what point during that season were we 18 games under .500 like we are now? The only point that season we were under .500 at all was when we lost the first 2 games of the season. Who's our current Ewing? Sprewell? Houston? Camby? JVG had his faults but he knew how to coach the **** out of defense. What the hell is Woodson good at? The only thing this team has in common with the 1999 team is Herb Williams.

You disrespect the memory of that team by comparing the two and any self-respecting Knicks fan would be ashamed of themselves for making the comparison.

You want a pissing match, at how many points in 1999 were we third in the division? My comparison is about just making the playoffs and no one expecting anything, not comparing records.
Who was your 1999 Melo? Who's our current Charlie Football? LJ?
Ewing? Patrick was at the tail end of his career and didn't even play for half the playoffs and barely finished the season. You seriously holding him up to a healthy double double Chandler right now?
Camby couldn't break the starting lineup behind Great GrandMaMa and the Krazy Eyes.
Woodson is good at getting to the playoffs. If he manages to coach this team to a spot this year, he apparently can do that much.

The memory of that team is "Now starting at center for your NBA Finals New York Knicks...Chris Dudley!" Thank you, JVG. Faults indeed.

Your self-respect would be better served by also being self-aware.

Lol, yeah who cares about "records" and "wins" and "losses"!

jrodmc wrote:

VCoug wrote:

jrodmc wrote:

VCoug wrote:

jrodmc wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:Jazz, Celtics, sixers, Bucks, Cavs. Knicks could have a nice run.

aaaannnddd what give you that impression?

One at a time (Copyright 2014 AnswerMan Industries, LLC)

the last sample size of one?
Hope springs eternal fellas. We shouldn't win any games, and that is exactly why we will win.

Thought for the day: 1999. All these years later, and we need to go through the same teams.
There be some happy ghosts in those rafters. Some of them even wearing Dolan's ties.

1999? You're joking, right? At what point during that season were we 18 games under .500 like we are now? The only point that season we were under .500 at all was when we lost the first 2 games of the season. Who's our current Ewing? Sprewell? Houston? Camby? JVG had his faults but he knew how to coach the **** out of defense. What the hell is Woodson good at? The only thing this team has in common with the 1999 team is Herb Williams.

You disrespect the memory of that team by comparing the two and any self-respecting Knicks fan would be ashamed of themselves for making the comparison.

You want a pissing match, at how many points in 1999 were we third in the division? My comparison is about just making the playoffs and no one expecting anything, not comparing records.
Who was your 1999 Melo? Who's our current Charlie Football? LJ?
Ewing? Patrick was at the tail end of his career and didn't even play for half the playoffs and barely finished the season. You seriously holding him up to a healthy double double Chandler right now?
Camby couldn't break the starting lineup behind Great GrandMaMa and the Krazy Eyes.
Woodson is good at getting to the playoffs. If he manages to coach this team to a spot this year, he apparently can do that much.

The memory of that team is "Now starting at center for your NBA Finals New York Knicks...Chris Dudley!" Thank you, JVG. Faults indeed.

Your self-respect would be better served by also being self-aware.

Lol, yeah who cares about "records" and "wins" and "losses"!

1999 was about overachieving to the insane level with little to no expectations. You got a problem, pinkie?

But there's a difference between overachieving when you're over .500 and overachieving when you're 15 games below .500.

And what the hell does pinkie mean?