[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

We have retooled without a trade.
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/31/2014  10:14 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Remember we fired the guy who drafted THJ as the season was about to start. We cut Tyler and risked losing him for Chris Smith

Well that guy did give us this sub .500 team and traded 3 draft picks for Bargs
perspective... it wasnt that bad. One first rounder, two second rounders and 3 guys who didnt have much of a role here if any for Bargs who is a talented player. It was a buy low trade. He didnt fit here.. it happens. I dont have a huge problem with that trade. Just because a move doesnt work doesnt make it terrible, and for all we know he may yet yield something positive.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

1/31/2014  10:19 AM
I just had a problem with the 1st round pick. Everything else included was okay.
fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/31/2014  10:19 AM
misterearl wrote:Post of The Day

Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:Is this the first "We blew it up without blowing it up" thread?

We imploded it in!

Put Bargs and Stat on the shelf. Put 36mil a year on the shelf and we get better?

Boston sucks, and Cleveland is awful. Im happy we are beating lessor teams. Not to long ago Philly came and gave it to us.

Nalod remembers.

So we got woodson:

1. Adapting
2. playing yoots
3. adapting
4. making good moves
.

This week.

Those who thought we got problems but Woodson is not one of them are proving correct (this week) as he has not lost his team and has reeled JR back into the fold.

Woodson also got much smarter when Tyson got his timing back. When Melo goes for 62pts, woodsons IQ goes up too!

Nalod thinks Woodson gets a lot from the rosters we have given him. Not a miracle worker mind you, just does a very very good job.

Tough love might not be what most of us wants but this is how it goes. Shump is on the Hump. Timmy should get his minutes and time to rebuild Shump back up when he gets well. His midlevel contract is slipping away and is one more shoulder problem away from Tony DouglasVille.

Thank you

I really liked Douglas... I thought that was a little move that could yield us solid player but he never could get healthy and going here. Some nice spurts but thats it. He is still in the league though, so clearly GMs do think he can play a bit but I hear Nalod on that
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/31/2014  10:23 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/31/2014  10:25 AM
Tyler and Tim Junior together, now you know yiu in trouble.

We haven't retooled

We have reyoot'd.

Ain't nothin but a T thing, baby.

once a knick always a knick
Nalod
Posts: 71335
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/31/2014  10:27 AM
misterearl wrote:
EnySpree wrote:Hallelujah!!!

This is all we needed really. Its a Shame is taken us this long to figure out. This is something that should have been settled in training camp and pre season. I don't want to hear excuses.

Jeremy Tyler was injured at the start of the season.

No, thank you!!!!!

Many think you can take a player from Summer league, report he has been masterbating to Hakeems Dream Camp big man DVD's learning "the Shake" (double the pun, double the fun)and think any delay in his progress has been the conspiracy of holding him back so he is not voted to the all star ruining our chances of resigning him or one of our dozens of Head coaches who are stubborn and don't want to play rookies! Simply add water and watch them go!

Tyler or any player "breaking out" is process. The kid has the physical attributes but when yo ask a player to bring energy its a limited time it can happen. I love when guys make a great run and then get taken out and everyone is freaking "why he take him out???" often the guy is gassed and thats when turnovers happen and injuries occur. Better to bring in a guy and let him play small samples successfully, not play him until he messes up. There is always a patience level with any player and you hve to accept the turnovers. Remember Lins first few games? Not that pretty. He had to playup to the speed of the game that is not in summerleague, or the Dleague or in practice.

Coach's coach to win in games. A player has to show something that warrents minutes and often its an injury that creates that opportunity.

There are no exuses, often there are just reasons!

Lets be real about Murry, the kid is not exactly creating a buzz is he? Its not to say we give up on him, we just say its a process.

Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/31/2014  10:56 AM
We are in great shape as long as we play the team like this, but still limited with Felton as starting PG. We will always need an upgrade badly to really maximize this group.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/31/2014  11:23 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Add
6-10 260 pounds C/PF Jeremy Tyler--brings size skill energy defense and rebounding
6-5 200 pound G Tim Hardaway JR--is already one of the best 3 pt shooters in the NBA a real explosive player and this is no fluke--hes legit
6-6 225 pound JR Smith--once he puts down the pipe--hes a starting NBA 2 guard who can run pass shoot play D
6-10 260 pound Cole Aldrich--hes a lane clogger and I think he can probably rebound with anyone in the NBA.

Subtract
7-0 250 C Andrea Barganani slow footed inconsistent player who is best set for European basketball
6-6 225 G Iman Shumpert knee injuries and attitude have lead to highly inconsistent play he needs a new gig its best for him and us
6-4 210 pd Beno Udirih You want out--we should remove you not a great fit here but can be quite useful somewhere else.

Wildcard Amare--he will need to fit in again? MWP--we he stay healthy and improve to give minutes on guys like Paul George and LBJ?

Transactions? Can we move Shumpert and Udirih for a quality third PG?

Yes, Yes and Yes............. I wonder if Shumpert and Beno get a quality wing so you don't have to hope MWP stays healthy.

Trevor Ariza
Thaddeus Young
Wilson Chandler

"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/31/2014  1:34 PM
The truth is that the Knicks did great with Bargs and STAT playing against a tougher schedule:

JANUARY	        OPPONENT      RESULT	W-L	
Thu, Jan 2 @San Antonio W105-101 10-21
Fri, Jan 3 @Houston L102-100 10-22
Sun, Jan 5 @Dallas W92-80 11-22
Tue, Jan 7 vsDetroit W89-85 12-22
Thu, Jan 9 vsMiami W102-92 13-22
Sat, Jan 11 @Philadelphia W102-92 14-22
Mon, Jan 13 vsPhoenix W98-96 OT 15-22

The current win streak minus Bargs has been against Charlotte, LA, Boston and Cleveland!!! I know we all wanted to see Woody make use of the small lineup and to get his act together, which seems to only happen when he has no choice, but this constant theme in the media and among fans that somehow this 4 game streak is proof that Bargs is the problem is just stupid. The best part of Bargs and STAT being down is Tyler getting a real chance to play.

Bargs and STAT don't have to be gone for this team to play good BB. Woody just has to do a better job with his lineups and rotations. Also fans and media are making too much of this streak and the small ball lineup. I'm glad the team is playing well and Woody finally is getting back to what worked, but lets take it easy on the idea that Bargs was a disaster. With him at Center we never played better defense than during that stretch that started out West, especially when Tyson went down. If Bargs or STAT came back, we can still play small but mix in using Bargs or STAT off the bench. It's really up to Woody. More important is the fact that during the streak that started out West and this home streak has been the improved play of our guards. Quite simply, if our guards play well, we win games. Doesn't really matter if Bargs is playing or not, it's about our guards. When we were losing our key guards were shooting below 40%.

Woodson has a tough decision down the line. He can't play everyone. Bargs, STAT, KMart and Tyler can't all play. What will he do is a big question. Does he have the guts to bench Vets for the sake of the team? Can Woody actually Bench Bargs and STAT if they're healthy? Seems to me that most nights when we aren't facing a team with size and post up threats, there's no reason to play Bargs or STAT big minutes.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/31/2014  1:39 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:I think this team can play around .550. Unfortunately, those injured players will be coming back though.

And thats the bad news

ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/31/2014  1:45 PM
Cartman718 wrote:
playa2 wrote:And as soon as we go in the dumps again against top tier talent, those same players Briggs will want shipped out. LOL

only if dumbass woodson decides to go with the "SLOW" lineup again, and i maintain... bargnani is not the one that makes this lineup slow...
we looked great against cavs who don't have a legit center and we might look good tomorrow against miami but the team that beat cleveland boston and other scrubs down... can they beat indiana?

the reason why we start 2 PGs... coz our starting PG just isn't that good on his own! The small ball got us past boston to face indiana last year, but then what happened... ? i'd rather face miami in the first round at this point than indiana. unless our bigs are back, we dont match up well with indiana.

and woodson is not smart enough to change lineups based on who he's facing, i mean that's coaching 101. how many mins and how many games do we have to play before he realizes he is being stubborn. he's talking in the papers these days about sticking with the 2 PG lineup. no **** sherlock what did you think felton was going to do when you saw him out of shape?

KYP - Know Your Personnel.... and Woodson clearly doesn't.

great post..Thats why when most of us were calling for woodson head, others were saying the roster sucked. To me it's been all about rotations and putting guys in the right position to utilize there skill set.

JR IMO was a major part of our down fall, but he's taking it to the hole more now that you don't have two 7 footers clogging the paint.

ES
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/31/2014  4:02 PM
knicks1248 - sometimes it just requires time.

Jeremy Tyler heals and is eased into his minutes, in the same way a chef adds spice. A little at a time. Seasoning to taste.

JR Smith gets a taste of tough love, his knees start to feel bouncy, and a rookie is playing his azz off.

Tim Hardaway Jr gains confidence. He was also added with care. The vets help him get acclimated.

Prigioni returns to help bail out "His Royal Stiffness" Ray Felton on running plays.

Through it all, Mike Woodson never flinches, or allows the roster to implode under the weight of trade rumors, boos at home, domino-effect injuries or his imminent firing

Dontcha jus love it when a plan comes together?

once a knick always a knick
blkexec
Posts: 28339
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
1/31/2014  5:32 PM
EnySpree wrote:Hallelujah!!!

This is all we needed really. Its a Shame is taken us this long to figure out. This is something that should have been settled in training camp and pre season. I don't want to hear excuses.

Anyway, I can dig the way they are playing. The key is to build around something and save Woodson from himself. Tyler and Cole need to stay in the rotation. Sorry who doesn't like it. We have to stop playing vets just because. We need to play the guys that are going to help us win. Everyone else we need to figure out a place for them.

If we can really get Lowery here for Felton, Shump and a pick then we need to do that. If we can move bargs or tyson we need to do that.

Tyler, kenyon, Tyson, and amare with cole is very good. We have the bigs to make us a touch tan not the ***** team that gets beat on the boards every night and killed inside.

**** bro!!!

So Damn frustrating.

1. I understand wanting to play vets....but lets plays vets that can actually play.
2. Woody likes vets because they are an extention coaches that covers up his weakness. aka Jason Kidd last year!

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/31/2014  5:34 PM
nixluva wrote:The truth is that the Knicks did great with Bargs and STAT playing against a tougher schedule:

JANUARY	        OPPONENT      RESULT	W-L	
Thu, Jan 2 @San Antonio W105-101 10-21
Fri, Jan 3 @Houston L102-100 10-22
Sun, Jan 5 @Dallas W92-80 11-22
Tue, Jan 7 vsDetroit W89-85 12-22
Thu, Jan 9 vsMiami W102-92 13-22
Sat, Jan 11 @Philadelphia W102-92 14-22
Mon, Jan 13 vsPhoenix W98-96 OT 15-22

The current win streak minus Bargs has been against Charlotte, LA, Boston and Cleveland!!! I know we all wanted to see Woody make use of the small lineup and to get his act together, which seems to only happen when he has no choice, but this constant theme in the media and among fans that somehow this 4 game streak is proof that Bargs is the problem is just stupid. The best part of Bargs and STAT being down is Tyler getting a real chance to play.

Bargs and STAT don't have to be gone for this team to play good BB. Woody just has to do a better job with his lineups and rotations. Also fans and media are making too much of this streak and the small ball lineup. I'm glad the team is playing well and Woody finally is getting back to what worked, but lets take it easy on the idea that Bargs was a disaster. With him at Center we never played better defense than during that stretch that started out West, especially when Tyson went down. If Bargs or STAT came back, we can still play small but mix in using Bargs or STAT off the bench. It's really up to Woody. More important is the fact that during the streak that started out West and this home streak has been the improved play of our guards. Quite simply, if our guards play well, we win games. Doesn't really matter if Bargs is playing or not, it's about our guards. When we were losing our key guards were shooting below 40%.

Woodson has a tough decision down the line. He can't play everyone. Bargs, STAT, KMart and Tyler can't all play. What will he do is a big question. Does he have the guts to bench Vets for the sake of the team? Can Woody actually Bench Bargs and STAT if they're healthy? Seems to me that most nights when we aren't facing a team with size and post up threats, there's no reason to play Bargs or STAT big minutes.

Nixluva. Bargs is not for this team. He can be used as injury insurance

RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/31/2014  5:38 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:The truth is that the Knicks did great with Bargs and STAT playing against a tougher schedule:

JANUARY	        OPPONENT      RESULT	W-L	
Thu, Jan 2 @San Antonio W105-101 10-21
Fri, Jan 3 @Houston L102-100 10-22
Sun, Jan 5 @Dallas W92-80 11-22
Tue, Jan 7 vsDetroit W89-85 12-22
Thu, Jan 9 vsMiami W102-92 13-22
Sat, Jan 11 @Philadelphia W102-92 14-22
Mon, Jan 13 vsPhoenix W98-96 OT 15-22

The current win streak minus Bargs has been against Charlotte, LA, Boston and Cleveland!!! I know we all wanted to see Woody make use of the small lineup and to get his act together, which seems to only happen when he has no choice, but this constant theme in the media and among fans that somehow this 4 game streak is proof that Bargs is the problem is just stupid. The best part of Bargs and STAT being down is Tyler getting a real chance to play.

Bargs and STAT don't have to be gone for this team to play good BB. Woody just has to do a better job with his lineups and rotations. Also fans and media are making too much of this streak and the small ball lineup. I'm glad the team is playing well and Woody finally is getting back to what worked, but lets take it easy on the idea that Bargs was a disaster. With him at Center we never played better defense than during that stretch that started out West, especially when Tyson went down. If Bargs or STAT came back, we can still play small but mix in using Bargs or STAT off the bench. It's really up to Woody. More important is the fact that during the streak that started out West and this home streak has been the improved play of our guards. Quite simply, if our guards play well, we win games. Doesn't really matter if Bargs is playing or not, it's about our guards. When we were losing our key guards were shooting below 40%.

Woodson has a tough decision down the line. He can't play everyone. Bargs, STAT, KMart and Tyler can't all play. What will he do is a big question. Does he have the guts to bench Vets for the sake of the team? Can Woody actually Bench Bargs and STAT if they're healthy? Seems to me that most nights when we aren't facing a team with size and post up threats, there's no reason to play Bargs or STAT big minutes.

Nixluva. Bargs is not for this team. He can be used as injury insurance

He's not really for this league

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
1/31/2014  6:04 PM
nixluva wrote:The truth is that the Knicks did great with Bargs and STAT playing against a tougher schedule:

JANUARY	        OPPONENT      RESULT	W-L	
Thu, Jan 2 @San Antonio W105-101 10-21
Fri, Jan 3 @Houston L102-100 10-22
Sun, Jan 5 @Dallas W92-80 11-22
Tue, Jan 7 vsDetroit W89-85 12-22
Thu, Jan 9 vsMiami W102-92 13-22
Sat, Jan 11 @Philadelphia W102-92 14-22
Mon, Jan 13 vsPhoenix W98-96 OT 15-22

The current win streak minus Bargs has been against Charlotte, LA, Boston and Cleveland!!! I know we all wanted to see Woody make use of the small lineup and to get his act together, which seems to only happen when he has no choice, but this constant theme in the media and among fans that somehow this 4 game streak is proof that Bargs is the problem is just stupid. The best part of Bargs and STAT being down is Tyler getting a real chance to play.

Bargs and STAT don't have to be gone for this team to play good BB. Woody just has to do a better job with his lineups and rotations. Also fans and media are making too much of this streak and the small ball lineup. I'm glad the team is playing well and Woody finally is getting back to what worked, but lets take it easy on the idea that Bargs was a disaster. With him at Center we never played better defense than during that stretch that started out West, especially when Tyson went down. If Bargs or STAT came back, we can still play small but mix in using Bargs or STAT off the bench. It's really up to Woody. More important is the fact that during the streak that started out West and this home streak has been the improved play of our guards. Quite simply, if our guards play well, we win games. Doesn't really matter if Bargs is playing or not, it's about our guards. When we were losing our key guards were shooting below 40%.

Woodson has a tough decision down the line. He can't play everyone. Bargs, STAT, KMart and Tyler can't all play. What will he do is a big question. Does he have the guts to bench Vets for the sake of the team? Can Woody actually Bench Bargs and STAT if they're healthy? Seems to me that most nights when we aren't facing a team with size and post up threats, there's no reason to play Bargs or STAT big minutes.

Agree about the streak with Bargs. The Knicks should have beaten Houston if Smith didn't mess up. That would have been seven consecutive wins until Tyson came back and the losing streak started. I think it proves that the Knicks need to play with one big, Tyson or Bargs.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

1/31/2014  6:12 PM
Well unfortunately, according to Bargs he completely tore a ligament in the elbow and doesn't know when he'll be back
Dagger
Posts: 22065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2012
Member: #4184

1/31/2014  8:26 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:The truth is that the Knicks did great with Bargs and STAT playing against a tougher schedule:

JANUARY	        OPPONENT      RESULT	W-L	
Thu, Jan 2 @San Antonio W105-101 10-21
Fri, Jan 3 @Houston L102-100 10-22
Sun, Jan 5 @Dallas W92-80 11-22
Tue, Jan 7 vsDetroit W89-85 12-22
Thu, Jan 9 vsMiami W102-92 13-22
Sat, Jan 11 @Philadelphia W102-92 14-22
Mon, Jan 13 vsPhoenix W98-96 OT 15-22

The current win streak minus Bargs has been against Charlotte, LA, Boston and Cleveland!!! I know we all wanted to see Woody make use of the small lineup and to get his act together, which seems to only happen when he has no choice, but this constant theme in the media and among fans that somehow this 4 game streak is proof that Bargs is the problem is just stupid. The best part of Bargs and STAT being down is Tyler getting a real chance to play.

Bargs and STAT don't have to be gone for this team to play good BB. Woody just has to do a better job with his lineups and rotations. Also fans and media are making too much of this streak and the small ball lineup. I'm glad the team is playing well and Woody finally is getting back to what worked, but lets take it easy on the idea that Bargs was a disaster. With him at Center we never played better defense than during that stretch that started out West, especially when Tyson went down. If Bargs or STAT came back, we can still play small but mix in using Bargs or STAT off the bench. It's really up to Woody. More important is the fact that during the streak that started out West and this home streak has been the improved play of our guards. Quite simply, if our guards play well, we win games. Doesn't really matter if Bargs is playing or not, it's about our guards. When we were losing our key guards were shooting below 40%.

Woodson has a tough decision down the line. He can't play everyone. Bargs, STAT, KMart and Tyler can't all play. What will he do is a big question. Does he have the guts to bench Vets for the sake of the team? Can Woody actually Bench Bargs and STAT if they're healthy? Seems to me that most nights when we aren't facing a team with size and post up threats, there's no reason to play Bargs or STAT big minutes.

Nixluva. Bargs is not for this team. He can be used as injury insurance

He's not really for this league

He's not even for this sport.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/1/2014  7:41 AM
Dagger wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nixluva wrote:The truth is that the Knicks did great with Bargs and STAT playing against a tougher schedule:

JANUARY	        OPPONENT      RESULT	W-L	
Thu, Jan 2 @San Antonio W105-101 10-21
Fri, Jan 3 @Houston L102-100 10-22
Sun, Jan 5 @Dallas W92-80 11-22
Tue, Jan 7 vsDetroit W89-85 12-22
Thu, Jan 9 vsMiami W102-92 13-22
Sat, Jan 11 @Philadelphia W102-92 14-22
Mon, Jan 13 vsPhoenix W98-96 OT 15-22

The current win streak minus Bargs has been against Charlotte, LA, Boston and Cleveland!!! I know we all wanted to see Woody make use of the small lineup and to get his act together, which seems to only happen when he has no choice, but this constant theme in the media and among fans that somehow this 4 game streak is proof that Bargs is the problem is just stupid. The best part of Bargs and STAT being down is Tyler getting a real chance to play.

Bargs and STAT don't have to be gone for this team to play good BB. Woody just has to do a better job with his lineups and rotations. Also fans and media are making too much of this streak and the small ball lineup. I'm glad the team is playing well and Woody finally is getting back to what worked, but lets take it easy on the idea that Bargs was a disaster. With him at Center we never played better defense than during that stretch that started out West, especially when Tyson went down. If Bargs or STAT came back, we can still play small but mix in using Bargs or STAT off the bench. It's really up to Woody. More important is the fact that during the streak that started out West and this home streak has been the improved play of our guards. Quite simply, if our guards play well, we win games. Doesn't really matter if Bargs is playing or not, it's about our guards. When we were losing our key guards were shooting below 40%.

Woodson has a tough decision down the line. He can't play everyone. Bargs, STAT, KMart and Tyler can't all play. What will he do is a big question. Does he have the guts to bench Vets for the sake of the team? Can Woody actually Bench Bargs and STAT if they're healthy? Seems to me that most nights when we aren't facing a team with size and post up threats, there's no reason to play Bargs or STAT big minutes.

Nixluva. Bargs is not for this team. He can be used as injury insurance

He's not really for this league

He's not even for this sport.

He's not even for this planet

We have retooled without a trade.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy