RonRon wrote:as the years goes up, he gets made more, and his FT well, stays in the 50% rangeNO ONE is going to want to pay him MAX $$$$, Majority of team would rather have a bunch of YOUNG talented roster on rookie contracts and minimum salary for a chance of 2015 than trade for Griffen
So that leaves players that are one player away
now what team that is missing a PF that shoots 50% FT to lead them to the finals?
In fact he doesn't even rebound on a consistent basis, he had higher value on his first couple years in the league, based just on potential, and now that he is payed max, that is just the way it is sometimes
He doesn't justify his contract despite his physical abilities, especially under this CBA
Dude, what are you talking about? With exception to one season (his 2nd, which was only 66 games due to the lockout), Blake has never shot below 64% from the stripe. And even if he did shoot in the 50% range, who cares? It has never made or broke a player before. Most Hall of Fame big men were piss poor to mediocre free throw shooters (e.g. Shaq, Dennis Rodman and Karl Malone) and they evidently did just fine in their careers. Dwight Howard might be the worst free throw shooter of our era, and teams were tripping over themselves to max him out this past offseason. So let's not pretend it's the end all, be all of a players value especially when the number of fouls he draws mean so much more to the team.
As for him being overpaid, I think that's ridiculous. Even though he's no where close to what people thought he'd be at this point, he is still a main attraction to any game. That generates revenue, moves merchandise and does plenty to raise the overall profile of a team. If the numbers were to bare themselves out, I would imagine that he'd be grossly UNDERpaid because of how much attention he brings. All of this hype and Blake still gives you 20, 10 and 3 at only 24 years old; plenty of time to round into a Hall of Fame player.