[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Here is a good trade for us that makes sens for OKC as well
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
12/11/2013  10:09 AM
MSG3 wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:It's a good trade for both teams. Essentially it is a trade of Tyson for 2 very late 1st rounders. Perkins is useless at this stage of his career and Perry Jones is a non factor right now. This all depends if OKC thinks that Tyson is fully healed to make a run this year and the next.

Also, I think they have a history of pining for Tyson. Didn't they want him right after the Mavs championship year?

They traded for him before he was on the Mavs and it got canceled because of an issue with his physical.

Ah..thank you.
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/11/2013  10:12 AM
Vmart wrote:I would do this deal like yesterday. Knicks are going nowhere as long as picks are coming back it may be worth it. Chandler is overrated no offense and he is not going to get the Knicks over the top.

which is why the thunder won't do it either... what I am finding now are trades being proposed by knick fans, basically saying the people we are giving up sucks, yet we expect to get back, first round picks and young promising talent.. LOL..

yea, I would do this trade for the picks like yesterday as well, but OKC wouldn't..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
12/11/2013  10:15 AM
tkf wrote:
Vmart wrote:I would do this deal like yesterday. Knicks are going nowhere as long as picks are coming back it may be worth it. Chandler is overrated no offense and he is not going to get the Knicks over the top.

which is why the thunder won't do it either... what I am finding now are trades being proposed by knick fans, basically saying the people we are giving up sucks, yet we expect to get back, first round picks and young promising talent.. LOL..

yea, I would do this trade for the picks like yesterday as well, but OKC wouldn't..

I'm for standing pat and letting contracts expire but if sideways deals can be done and it yields no extra contract years and a pick it would be well worth it. I'm willing to do this deal for a single pick no two as proposed by Briggs.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
12/11/2013  10:21 AM
The only trade that Knicks can really do right now is the one involving Melo. You gotta blow this **** up.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
12/11/2013  10:26 AM
NYKBocker wrote:The only trade that Knicks can really do right now is the one involving Melo. You gotta blow this **** up.

Picks picks and more picks. I'm down with this too.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
12/11/2013  10:37 AM
Vmart wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:The only trade that Knicks can really do right now is the one involving Melo. You gotta blow this **** up.

Picks picks and more picks. I'm down with this too.

Picks and yoots
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/11/2013  11:04 AM
tkf wrote:
Vmart wrote:I would do this deal like yesterday. Knicks are going nowhere as long as picks are coming back it may be worth it. Chandler is overrated no offense and he is not going to get the Knicks over the top.

which is why the thunder won't do it either... what I am finding now are trades being proposed by knick fans, basically saying the people we are giving up sucks, yet we expect to get back, first round picks and young promising talent.. LOL..

yea, I would do this trade for the picks like yesterday as well, but OKC wouldn't..

Perkins is probably why OKC does not win it all. Hes no where near as good as Chandler. Tyson still leads the leageu in FG% and is a top 15 defender and top 3 defensive C I know Presti already likes Tyson and anyone who knows basketball knos Tyson is worth two picks in the 20's + a player who is not used. We are making them a favorite for the championship in this trade.

RIP Crushalot😞
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34064
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
12/11/2013  11:07 AM
if the Knicks do blow it up, OKC would be a good destination for Melo. Melo for Ibaka, Adams, and Lamb and whatever filler is needed
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
12/11/2013  11:17 AM
The Knicks actually have a lot of very tradeable players if they do things right. For example, I'm sure there would be many suitors for Tyson, Melo, Shump, Beno that could be packaged with Felton (good contract), JR (not a terrible contract), Bargnani (not useless, expires next year or ETO), etc.

But the Knicks will botch everything because Dolan.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/11/2013  11:19 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:if the Knicks do blow it up, OKC would be a good destination for Melo. Melo for Ibaka, Adams, and Lamb and whatever filler is needed

i do like briggs original deal. think it works out great for both teams. okc is NOT going to trade rotational guys.. too bad we cant get a guy like reggie jackson back though.

i wish we could send them melo AND chandler. id love to take ibaka back. any deal would have to involve a third team though.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/11/2013  11:32 AM
nyk4ever wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:if the Knicks do blow it up, OKC would be a good destination for Melo. Melo for Ibaka, Adams, and Lamb and whatever filler is needed

i do like briggs original deal. think it works out great for both teams. okc is NOT going to trade rotational guys.. too bad we cant get a guy like reggie jackson back though.

i wish we could send them melo AND chandler. id love to take ibaka back. any deal would have to involve a third team though.

They have melo and durant--0 need for melo they will NOT change the rotational function of this team other than Perkins

RIP Crushalot😞
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34064
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
12/11/2013  1:16 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
nyk4ever wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:if the Knicks do blow it up, OKC would be a good destination for Melo. Melo for Ibaka, Adams, and Lamb and whatever filler is needed

i do like briggs original deal. think it works out great for both teams. okc is NOT going to trade rotational guys.. too bad we cant get a guy like reggie jackson back though.

i wish we could send them melo AND chandler. id love to take ibaka back. any deal would have to involve a third team though.

They have melo and durant--0 need for melo they will NOT change the rotational function of this team other than Perkins

so I take it you thought/think OKC should have dealt James Harden for reasons outside of money?

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/11/2013  1:18 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nyk4ever wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:if the Knicks do blow it up, OKC would be a good destination for Melo. Melo for Ibaka, Adams, and Lamb and whatever filler is needed

i do like briggs original deal. think it works out great for both teams. okc is NOT going to trade rotational guys.. too bad we cant get a guy like reggie jackson back though.

i wish we could send them melo AND chandler. id love to take ibaka back. any deal would have to involve a third team though.

They have melo and durant--0 need for melo they will NOT change the rotational function of this team other than Perkins

so I take it you thought/think OKC should have dealt James Harden for reasons outside of money?

It was money but the team as is has 0 need for melo--they have two primary scorers who take a lot of shots. They have efficient scorers off the bench in Lamb and jackson. The missing piece is more production from C--we can provide that.

RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/11/2013  1:47 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nyk4ever wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:if the Knicks do blow it up, OKC would be a good destination for Melo. Melo for Ibaka, Adams, and Lamb and whatever filler is needed

i do like briggs original deal. think it works out great for both teams. okc is NOT going to trade rotational guys.. too bad we cant get a guy like reggie jackson back though.

i wish we could send them melo AND chandler. id love to take ibaka back. any deal would have to involve a third team though.

They have melo and durant--0 need for melo they will NOT change the rotational function of this team other than Perkins

so I take it you thought/think OKC should have dealt James Harden for reasons outside of money?


I wouldn't interpret what Briggs said like that. Harden brings a wide range of skills. The one thing Melo brings - high PPG - isn't a need of theirs.
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Here is a good trade for us that makes sens for OKC as well
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy