Bonn1997 wrote:

Vmart wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:I really like the idea of moving Stat for Humphries and Crash. I think a Wallace/Metta rotation or playing them at the same time would be really hard on teams. Humphries minutes and numbers have been down but he is a big that gets rebounds and plays physical. It would add a lot to the roster. Also, a 2 for 1 deal would require that someone be waived.

Are you winning a championship with that?

Exactly. I wouldn't add any money past 2015 unless it was for a player who would have a critical role on a championship level team.

Clean wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:I really like the idea of moving Stat for Humphries and Crash. I think a Wallace/Metta rotation or playing them at the same time would be really hard on teams. Humphries minutes and numbers have been down but he is a big that gets rebounds and plays physical. It would add a lot to the roster. Also, a 2 for 1 deal would require that someone be waived.

that is the same old Knicks type of move. If his trade happens and melo walks we will be left with no assets and no cap space. The plan should be to stick with 2015 plan and trade everyone for assets. It is time to receive assets instead of flushing them down the toilet.

CrushAlot wrote:

Clean wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:I really like the idea of moving Stat for Humphries and Crash. I think a Wallace/Metta rotation or playing them at the same time would be really hard on teams. Humphries minutes and numbers have been down but he is a big that gets rebounds and plays physical. It would add a lot to the roster. Also, a 2 for 1 deal would require that someone be waived.

that is the same old Knicks type of move. If his trade happens and melo walks we will be left with no assets and no cap space. The plan should be to stick with 2015 plan and trade everyone for assets. It is time to receive assets instead of flushing them down the toilet.

When you say assets do you mean draft picks? What guys are being traded for draft picks?

Yes draft picks and young players who play the right way. Trade everyone except for Tim and Shump. When the trade deadline comes people will be willing to part with picks and young players if they think they can get a player that can put them in championship contention. We are always the team doing that so now its time to sucker some other fools into giving us the assets.

Clean wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

Clean wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:I really like the idea of moving Stat for Humphries and Crash. I think a Wallace/Metta rotation or playing them at the same time would be really hard on teams. Humphries minutes and numbers have been down but he is a big that gets rebounds and plays physical. It would add a lot to the roster. Also, a 2 for 1 deal would require that someone be waived.

that is the same old Knicks type of move. If his trade happens and melo walks we will be left with no assets and no cap space. The plan should be to stick with 2015 plan and trade everyone for assets. It is time to receive assets instead of flushing them down the toilet.

When you say assets do you mean draft picks? What guys are being traded for draft picks?

Yes draft picks and young players who play the right way. Trade everyone except for Tim and Shump. When the trade deadline comes people will be willing to part with picks and young players if they think they can get a player that can put them in championship contention. We are always the team doing that so now its time to sucker some other fools into giving us the assets.

Clean wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

Clean wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

Vmart wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:I really like the idea of moving Stat for Humphries and Crash. I think a Wallace/Metta rotation or playing them at the same time would be really hard on teams. Humphries minutes and numbers have been down but he is a big that gets rebounds and plays physical. It would add a lot to the roster. Also, a 2 for 1 deal would require that someone be waived.

Are you winning a championship with that?

Exactly. I wouldn't add any money past 2015 unless it was for a player who would have a critical role on a championship level team.

I think you have to roll the dice. What guys are you thinking come to the Knicks in 2015 that gets them to win a championship? Also, Hump is off the books at 12 mil at the end of this season.

I don't care if we don't get free agents. You collect assets and build the right way. Free agents are the icing on the cake. Oh yea, no more one dimensional, ISO or low IQ players.

Are you counting on the 2015, 2017 and then barring any trades 2018 picks? I think the Knicks are all in with their current roster and would improve it if they could. I agree that taking on cap space may not be the best thing but hoping to build the right way when you only have a pick every other year for the next 4 years doesn't seem like a realistic plan.

I agree it will be hard since we have no draft picks. This is why I was against the melo and bargs trade. I just feel we have to start somewhere. Will it be slower than normal? Yes, but we have to build the culture and that is something we can start without the draft picks. No longer will we be short sighted and impatient. The Knicks are always surrounded in drama due to Dolan and the way he wants to build teams due to impatience. Doing that celtics trade would only add to the long history of actions that prove that point.

ShellTopAdidas wrote:I love Amere but he doesn't fit here in this style offence. Put him with a penetrating pg who can play the high PnR and you got something.