djsunyc wrote:b/c he's still a major liability on the court.team defense is atrocious when he's on the court and his +/- is just downright terrible.
you see a few stops man 2 man and think it's ok...but it's not. it's only a very small portion of total defense and those 1 on 1 opportunities are few and far between.
when bargs isn't playing, the knicks are around a bottom 10 defensive team. when he is, the knicks are around a bottom 5 defensive team of all time.
trading for him was not a smart move. (well smart for us and not for you). the smart move now would be to move him on as soon as you can b/c there is a better than decent chance the picks you end up trading will be much higher than anticipated.
try to parlay some positive press he's getting with some nationally televised games and cash in.
I totally disagree -- I think Barg's has looked outstanding after the first 2-3 games and last game he shot poorly but played Hibbert better than Chandler.
Barg's has played all of his one-one match ups straight up and never really needed help from anyone -- that includes guys like Dwight and Hibbard.
Now all the other dudes on our team -- can't seem to control their match-ups by themselves so everyone wants to point to their favorite scape-goat Bargs.
The guy can't play the high screen and roll --- I get it. But he's fine otherwise and the rest of the team (including our hall-of-fame defensive ace Shump-Shump) have been below average.
BARGS is not the problem --- our guards may be the worst in the league so far this season.