tkf wrote:nixluva wrote:I think too many fans compare "Production" with "Impact". A guy like Love, Griffin or George has good production but in my opinion Melo has greater impact. He just changes the way a team plays and the way other teams play you. Very few players actually have a game that has impact. I'm not saying he's efficient but he puts pressure on the other team in a way that helps his team. However, you must have the rest of the team able to function at a decent level of efficiency. That's what we had for a good part of last year with the exception of the playoffs. Now they have to find a way to maintain the good team BB into the playoffs. There has to be a balance of the ISO ball and Team ball. We lost that balance in the playoffs last year.
what teams changes the way they play for carmelo? name me one team.. not the heat, not the bulls, not the pacers.... who? teams usually have a fairly easy game plan for carmelo, one which doesn't take much planning or changing... If you don't think guys like george and blake griffin don't have huge impacts on games then I suggest you watch more NBA outside of the knicks...
You actually only think you know what you're talking about. In truth it's not about changing what they do, but teams do have to account for Melo. You can't totally ignore the fact that Melo was one of the top scorers in the league last year with a high usage rate and thus teams do in fact have to account for Melo. He can't be ignored. If teams were so successful in stopping him with simple tactics then he wouldn't be able to score.
It's not Melo's fault that the play calling was simplistic and poor last year in the playoffs. It didn't have to be that way. That was Woody's fault. It's up to the coach to make the best use of a talent like Melo. Woody will never be confused with an offensive genius but he can and must do a better job.
The Bulls and Pacers are GREAT defensive teams. They do a great job of defending ISO plays. Now the issue isn't Melo, but WOODSON in how he responds to this fact. You have to attack those teams with more TEAM BB. Smarter plays that will force the defense to make adjustments and open up better shots for Melo. Woodson didn't run fewer ISO's against those teams he ran MORE!!! This was the height of BB stupidity.
Maybe the Knicks would have been better served going with a balance between pick-and-rolls and isolation sets.Felton thrived in the pick-and-roll in the third quarter on Sunday and the Knicks have had success on such plays in the postseason.
They are averaging 1.15 points per play on pick-and-roll plays and 0.67 points per play in isolation sets, per ESPN Stats and Information.
We all saw and commented on the fact that when Melo went quick with his offense rather than holding the ball and going ISO the team played much better. That's on the coach to make sure how the team plays is firmly in the minds of his players.
I believe the Knicks do in fact realize they had too much ISO with Melo and JR. I think they do want to mix it up more and become less predictable. In an offense that is more team oriented Melo will be more effective as will the entire team. We've all said it, the answer is BALL AND PLAYER MOVEMENT!!!