gunsnewing wrote:The way I see it...Clear Cut
Heat
OKC
In the scussion
Knicks(w/Sheed & Camby)
Bulls
Spurs
These teams play championship caliber basketball. Stars, Depth, Bigs, defense, rebounding, 3's, veteran leadership, scoring inside & out, getting to the line, bench scoring
Solid regular season teams with little shot at the getting to the Finals & some flaws
Clippers
Lakers
Warriors
Exciting regular season with NO shot at getting to the finals & multiple flaws
Nuggets
Pacers
Hawks
Teams a piece away from making noise
Houston
Teams that think they are good but really aren't but are 1st or 2nd round exit teams
Brooklyn
guns your descriptions don't seem to fit all of the teams... for instance why should "stars" be a prerequisite for a team to play championship caliber basketball... do the pacers have a star according to you? if not, do you really think there is a difference in quality of ball between them and the knicks? the pacers and nuggets both are better rebounding teams than the knicks by far, they both have depth, bigs, veteran leadership, they can score inside and out actually denver leads the league in points in the paint.. houston is 3rd, clippers 2nd. knicks last..
I am not saying I completely disagree with your list, but if we are going to be honest, the pacers deserve to be in the discussion as they pushed miami last year.. knicks have just one playoff win.... lets put ourselves in the pacers shoes... would we really buy that the knicks are more of a contender than we are( being pacers fans that is)...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF