[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How about Wallace Thomas +
Author Thread
IronWillGiroud
Posts: 25207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2012
Member: #4359

1/29/2013  10:58 PM
Alright let's do it
The Will, check out the Official Home of Will's GameDay Art: http://tinyurl.com/thewillgameday
AUTOADVERT
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
1/29/2013  11:51 PM
its actually only for 30 days till they can trade an amnestied player
You just can't trade the players back to the team that amnestied them

I would have done it for a 2nd round pick but I am not so sure about a future 1st rounder
*mainly since we won't know what to expect with a 2018 pick, it could be the next Alridge/Noah again*

Also I am not sure if I would rather prefer Wright or Brand at his age *being undersized and downhill with athleticism*
At least Wright is extremely lengthy, is a shot blocking presence, and can play Center with ease with his length

I think Carter can still shoot and has good size off the bench

I mean honestly, I would rather just sign Kenyon Martin and add Chris Johnson and Mickael Gelabale which were both extended extra 10 day contracts by the Twolves
I think a 1st round pick that far from now can really bite come back to haunt us again
I do agree we should part ways with of these players that don't contribute much, some have no value on the market, and many play the same positions as each other

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/30/2013  8:54 AM
After last night Dallas is done imho
RIP Crushalot😞
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34064
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

1/30/2013  9:37 AM
BRIGGS wrote:After last night Dallas is done imho

I completely agree with that... Cuban probably wants to rip it apart so he can play with his toy in the offseason. So I also think he might favor a trade like this. I doubt the front office would, but I could see the appeal to the owner

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34064
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

1/30/2013  9:40 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
Anji wrote:Brand would be money in the starting line up.

He would be perfect and so would Carter. Im not a believer in this team as is. I think its somewhat close--but a deal like this would put us right up at the top. We could rely on these players--they dont need big minutes but with Chandler Amare Brand upfront Carter Felton with JR and Kidd back up all around Anthony--we would be tough to beat. Ill give up a 1 for that easily.

the team could use both. but I'm with Anji, Brand would be perfect with this team - 28 mpg to Brand and 20 mpg to Amar'e. It's almost too perfect

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
1/30/2013  9:56 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
Anji wrote:Brand would be money in the starting line up.

He would be perfect and so would Carter. Im not a believer in this team as is. I think its somewhat close--but a deal like this would put us right up at the top. We could rely on these players--they dont need big minutes but with Chandler Amare Brand upfront Carter Felton with JR and Kidd back up all around Anthony--we would be tough to beat. Ill give up a 1 for that easily.

Agreed. Carter is a good 3pt shooter and Brand's jumper is money and would fit very well if they ran the pick n pop with him. He's also decent on the boards. I would definitely approve this move. Doubt Dallas does it, especially if Cuban is still salty about Kidd coming to Gotham

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
1/30/2013  9:58 AM
gunsnewing wrote:I don't think that is enough enticing maybe if JR was added but i don't see the Knicks shaking this team up now when they are finally trying to develop some kind of cohesion

getting Vince would more than make up for the loss of Jr on the offensive side but, I think our defense would suffer. JR is a more committed defender and I think that might be more important at this point. Not sure Brand would bring enough to the table to justify weakening our perimeter defense.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
1/30/2013  9:59 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/30/2013  10:02 AM
Yeah, throw away more draft picks for really aged starphucques. That would surely prove popular around here.
VC has upside, but Brand? He's a minor upgrade over the geriatrics we have now and he's dropping off the charts quickly.

Keep the draft pick, throw in KT with Brewer and a 2nd rounder or two and we also get the rights to AI and it's a deal.

Cuban's just as likely to do that as anything else. Plus, given our recent Mavs history, why would he even consider giving us anything but stale cow pies?

fishmike
Posts: 53862
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/30/2013  10:21 AM
this makes a lot of sense. Brand would be perfect, and Carter is an upgrade over JR.

Heres the problem, you have to include Shump, we arent giving enough and NYK management would do that. After all they peddled Shump for Nash.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
1/30/2013  10:24 AM
fishmike wrote:this makes a lot of sense. Brand would be perfect, and Carter is an upgrade over JR.

Heres the problem, you have to include Shump, we arent giving enough and NYK management would do that. After all they peddled Shump for Nash.

One would hope that Grunnie would see how that's currently working itself out and not throw away the time and patience already vested in Shump.

Hope, I said.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/30/2013  10:26 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/30/2013  10:27 AM
This would be the Knicks trade for the prehistoric Brand and VC

Shump
JR
Copeland
Kurt
Brewer
2018 1st rd pick(Lottery pick)
2019 2nd rd pick

DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
1/30/2013  10:36 AM
you do not include a young prospect that is already a good defender for these guys. Brand is in the twilight of his nba career and an aging Vince. I can see moving JR because Vince brings is the better shooter by far but, not Shump and I don't think that's the homer in me speaking.
the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
fishmike
Posts: 53862
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/30/2013  11:05 AM
DurzoBlint wrote:you do not include a young prospect that is already a good defender for these guys. Brand is in the twilight of his nba career and an aging Vince. I can see moving JR because Vince brings is the better shooter by far but, not Shump and I don't think that's the homer in me speaking.
thats not homer mate.. just HOPE.

How would you catagorize Nash? Because Knicks tried like hell to S&T Nash using Shump this offseason.

At one point I very excited about the future of this team. We had the stud frontcourt w/ Melo/Amare/Chandler and a young dymanic backcourt of Lin/Shump, a great combo of defense, floor leadership, bla bla bla

Lin gone for nothing and front office did everything they could to trade Shump for a 38 year old PG. I will never root for or be a fan of another NBA team, but loving this one is tough

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

1/30/2013  11:16 AM
DurzoBlint wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Anji wrote:Brand would be money in the starting line up.

He would be perfect and so would Carter. Im not a believer in this team as is. I think its somewhat close--but a deal like this would put us right up at the top. We could rely on these players--they dont need big minutes but with Chandler Amare Brand upfront Carter Felton with JR and Kidd back up all around Anthony--we would be tough to beat. Ill give up a 1 for that easily.

Agreed. Carter is a good 3pt shooter and Brand's jumper is money and would fit very well if they ran the pick n pop with him. He's also decent on the boards. I would definitely approve this move. Doubt Dallas does it, especially if Cuban is still salty about Kidd coming to Gotham

This
I don't anticipate any Dallas-New York deals, for a while.

"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
1/30/2013  12:18 PM
JR has a no trade clause, I doubt he agrees to this, and we can't trade a pick either.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/30/2013  12:25 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
nyk4ever wrote:briggs, why would the mavs ever do this?

This

+infinity

Yup.

DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
1/30/2013  2:11 PM
fishmike wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:you do not include a young prospect that is already a good defender for these guys. Brand is in the twilight of his nba career and an aging Vince. I can see moving JR because Vince brings is the better shooter by far but, not Shump and I don't think that's the homer in me speaking.
thats not homer mate.. just HOPE.

How would you catagorize Nash? Because Knicks tried like hell to S&T Nash using Shump this offseason.

At one point I very excited about the future of this team. We had the stud frontcourt w/ Melo/Amare/Chandler and a young dymanic backcourt of Lin/Shump, a great combo of defense, floor leadership, bla bla bla

Lin gone for nothing and front office did everything they could to trade Shump for a 38 year old PG. I will never root for or be a fan of another NBA team, but loving this one is tough

I'm not sure that they really were going to add Shump to that deal. Not sure any of us can say that with surety but, to answer your question, seeing Nash and remembering how bad his man on man defense is, I am happy with what we have. Also, who knows how durable he will be down the stretch. He's already missed a bit of time this season.

This teams is not suited for the run and gun; even if we didn't have all the old timers, there aren't enough good shooters on this team to make it work. Amare would have benefited but, I believe the team as a whole would not be as good.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/30/2013  2:39 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:I would do this trade in a heartbeat. Carter has really added a lot of dimensions to his game and is defending the best he ever has. Brand is solid all around and a great veteran presence all around.

but there's no way I see Dallas doing this unless the pick ends up with flimsy protection which I am not down with.

Id let it go with only top 6 protected--that is fair. That would give us a team that could truly truly compete for the next 2 years--what draft pick is worth that?

Isn't one of the most valuable things to have in today's NBA is an All-Star level talent or even a solid starter on a rookie contract?

I get what you're saying that most guys drafted in the Lottery are out of the league by the end of their rookie contract but the chance of catching lightning in a bottle is something I hate giving up.

Examples of lighting in a bottle past pick # 6:

2012 in a "weak draft": Terrence Ross and Andre Drummond are looking solid.
2011: Kemba Walker, Klay Thompson, Kawhi Leonard, SHUMP! Faried, Jimmy Butler, Isiah Thomas (60th pick!)

I mean just from 2011 every single one of those guys would be making a major impact on this season's team in just their 2nd season after a lockout shortened rookie season.

In terms of winning during this Melo/Amare/Chandler era it's hard to say that Vince/Elton Brand are easy to choose over say..Andre Drummond to give Chandler some rest while we still get a monster rebounder, shot blocker, pick and roll finisher. Klay Thompson would be AWESOME in spacing the floor for Melo and a solid defender already.

I think if you look at the history of the draft, you will find that statement to not be accurate..
just go back 10 years and you will see that most lottery picks had pretty productive careers, extended careers.

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
fishmike
Posts: 53862
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/30/2013  2:40 PM
DurzoBlint wrote:
fishmike wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:you do not include a young prospect that is already a good defender for these guys. Brand is in the twilight of his nba career and an aging Vince. I can see moving JR because Vince brings is the better shooter by far but, not Shump and I don't think that's the homer in me speaking.
thats not homer mate.. just HOPE.

How would you catagorize Nash? Because Knicks tried like hell to S&T Nash using Shump this offseason.

At one point I very excited about the future of this team. We had the stud frontcourt w/ Melo/Amare/Chandler and a young dymanic backcourt of Lin/Shump, a great combo of defense, floor leadership, bla bla bla

Lin gone for nothing and front office did everything they could to trade Shump for a 38 year old PG. I will never root for or be a fan of another NBA team, but loving this one is tough

I'm not sure that they really were going to add Shump to that deal. Not sure any of us can say that with surety but, to answer your question, seeing Nash and remembering how bad his man on man defense is, I am happy with what we have. Also, who knows how durable he will be down the stretch. He's already missed a bit of time this season.

This teams is not suited for the run and gun; even if we didn't have all the old timers, there aren't enough good shooters on this team to make it work. Amare would have benefited but, I believe the team as a whole would not be as good.


love Nash but TERRIBLE deal. When we will ever learn? Keep Shump and build. Lin/Shump had great backcourt potential but oh well.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Knixkik
Posts: 35473
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/30/2013  2:45 PM
Brand would be great. Maybe we can sign him this summer. He would be perfect at the 4.
How about Wallace Thomas +

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy