Phil Pressey looks like...........lol, he looks like Chris Paul-lite.

Woh, why isn't he on anybodies lottery board??????? 81st on Draftnet and 28th on draftexpress

I think Pierre Jackson looks more like a CP3 lite to me, in between the size of Nate Robinson/ Cp3/TJ Ford and lowest Scott Machado??
This little man can ball, he will be a complete steal, and it a TRUE PG

As Cp3 being his highest potential ceiling and possibly somewhere between Isiah Thomas/Ty Lawson/Darren Collison/TJ Ford/Nate Robinson being more realistic
This might be the closest we can get to the toast of Melo/Amare and CP3

Props to Anji for finding Phil Pressey, really think he would be a steal, if we can get him with a middle/late 2nd rounder
Problem is if he isn't selected with a 1st rounder or early 2nd rounder, and he does develop him to a good player and shows promise in 2 year's, he could get a poison pill that can hurt us in the future especially for 2015 FA draft class..

RonRon wrote:yeah, its still early, gotta wait till mid March for some hype

as for Adam Morrision 2.0, I think we have Copeland's role on the team already

In no particular order, I think we need

--PG-- probably no more hybrids, we have Kidd at SG and Iman as the hybrid already

--PF/C-- preferably in the mode of Ibaka or Taj Gibson * a shot blocking PF that runs the court well and is mobile/athletic/long*

--SG/SF-- Kawaii Leanord/James Johnson/Marion/Gereld Wallace or Klay Thompson or Wilson Chandler/Matt Barnes, possibly 2 players at this position for JR Smith replacement

I know sometimes you must take the best player available regardless of position IF THAT PLAYER IS REALLY THAT MUCH BETTER if they are similar, draft by our needs

I think SG/SF is the easiest position the fill in FA, although we only have the Mini MLE and veteran's minimum *which is no longer scrubs with the New CBA*

Mcdermott is much more Wally Z he looks nothing like Morrison hes put together and has a toughness about his game. I think he might be number 1 PER in all of college basketball. Hes not a lead type player but a guy who could go with a Carmelo Anthony very well. When you are 6-9 and can play like he does---hes going to be a good nba player.

RonRon wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

RonRon wrote:yeah, its still early, gotta wait till mid March for some hype

as for Adam Morrision 2.0, I think we have Copeland's role on the team already

In no particular order, I think we need

--PG-- probably no more hybrids, we have Kidd at SG and Iman as the hybrid already

--PF/C-- preferably in the mode of Ibaka or Taj Gibson * a shot blocking PF that runs the court well and is mobile/athletic/long*

--SG/SF-- Kawaii Leanord/James Johnson/Marion/Gereld Wallace or Klay Thompson or Wilson Chandler/Matt Barnes, possibly 2 players at this position for JR Smith replacement

I know sometimes you must take the best player available regardless of position IF THAT PLAYER IS REALLY THAT MUCH BETTER if they are similar, draft by our needs

I think SG/SF is the easiest position the fill in FA, although we only have the Mini MLE and veteran's minimum *which is no longer scrubs with the New CBA*

Mcdermott is much more Wally Z he looks nothing like Morrison hes put together and has a toughness about his game. I think he might be number 1 PER in all of college basketball. Hes not a lead type player but a guy who could go with a Carmelo Anthony very well. When you are 6-9 and can play like he does---hes going to be a good nba player.

I was referring to Gonzaga's big vs Copeland
didn't even realize he was 7'1
he looks more like a slow PF than a Center

Briggs what do u think about Pierre Jackson vs Charles Jenkins if available as our backup PG's for next season?
I know it is just highlight's I am watching on Pierre Jackson but he looks like he can be a legit PG that is a complete steal to me

Pierre Jackson is too small I do like Jenkins he could play if given a chance..hes more of a small 2 g than pg but close enough.

BRIGGS wrote:

Anji wrote:Phil Pressey FTW, the guy has starter potential and is a true general............he probably moves out of our range though.

Id put my 5 bucks Nate Wolters is better than both of them. Those are two very smallish G's who dont shoot that well. Wolters is a legit 6-4 with much more PG talent than he has shown. I like tall PG's if I can get them. He has to improve his long range shooting but after that you have what could be the next Steve Nash.

Calderon or Lowry?
Size vs Speed would be a good comparison, especially if you cannot use that size to your advantage on DEFENSE it becomes quite useless

I personally would much rather have a PG that has speed/quickness rather than size without physical abilities of a freak like Westbrook

Jackson know's how to use his speed and quickness to set up other's, as well as for himself, has a pretty good shot as well, on and off the ball
I don't think he is a *Scoring PG* either, with speed/quickness/handle/ability to penetrate/finish it is much easier to initiate an offense and break down defenses
Question is will he still be effective in the NBA game and/or how long will it take for him to adjust like Nate Robinson had to work hard and adjust to the NBA game?
His STAT's are not great, along with his size, and that is why he will be under the radar, but I think he is much better than his STATS show and his game will translate in the NBA

Kemba/Cp3/Nate Robinson/Isiah Thomas are players that I see Jackson developing in to with fair comparisons physically with a good understanding of the game

I also think they should look to pick up DJO as a high risk/reward on their roster, but doubt it will happen with Woodys preference to be veterans...

Vasquez, Calderon, Westbrook, Temple, Wall are some of the bigger PG in the league
I think Calderon would be the fairest comparison for the ceiling of Nate Walter's *when he full develops* judging from what I see from his clips

No one else here agrees with me about Pierre Jackson??

BRIGGS wrote:

Anji wrote:Phil Pressey FTW, the guy has starter potential and is a true general............he probably moves out of our range though.

Id put my 5 bucks Nate Wolters is better than both of them. Those are two very smallish G's who dont shoot that well. Wolters is a legit 6-4 with much more PG talent than he has shown. I like tall PG's if I can get them. He has to improve his long range shooting but after that you have what could be the next Steve Nash.

I know nothing about this guy, but being 6'4 doesn't mean much if you aren't athletic enough to beat the second defender to the hoop or guard anybody. And if he is more of a scorer than a point guard getting by on his height in college, he'll likely bust too.