[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Open letter to Nets fans visiting our board
Author Thread
IrishKnickFan
Posts: 23223
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2012
Member: #4171

12/12/2012  9:42 AM
NYKMentality wrote:
IrishKnickFan wrote:
NYKMentality wrote:
Nalod wrote:
NYKMentality wrote:No matter how you slice it, the Nets are an Atlantic division rival of the New York Knicks.

Enjoy rooting and/or supporting our division rivals... lol.

A Knicks fan supporting the Nets is the same as a Jets fan supporting the Bills. It doesn't happen. AFC East (division) rivals.

Bills play 500 miles away in another city.

Doesn't matter, still a New York franchise. The Jets and Bills may play in different cities but then again, the Knicks and Nets now play in different Boroughs. Still DIVISION RIVALS.

Also, the Mets vs Yankees? AL East vs NL East. Giants vs Jets? AFC East vs NFC East.

Since when is it o.k (in sports) to SUPPORT A DIVISION RIVAL?!?

Laughable.

Have of habit of questioning people's loyalty?

Not questioning anyone's loyality. But, if you're supporting a division rival? Well, then, your loyality deserves to be questioned.

The Nets are a division rival, are they not? I know Melo and the rest of our Knicks consider them to be division rivals. By supporting the Nets, you're supporting a division rival... Are you not?

For a Knicks fan to support the Nets is just as bad as a Knicks fan supporting the Boston Celtics and/or Toronto Raptors ala Atlantic Division Rivals.

You get too excited man even in the game threads you start getting on people if the knicks arent playing well.
AUTOADVERT
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
12/12/2012  9:49 AM
NYKMentality wrote:
IrishKnickFan wrote:
NYKMentality wrote:
Nalod wrote:
NYKMentality wrote:No matter how you slice it, the Nets are an Atlantic division rival of the New York Knicks.

Enjoy rooting and/or supporting our division rivals... lol.

A Knicks fan supporting the Nets is the same as a Jets fan supporting the Bills. It doesn't happen. AFC East (division) rivals.

Bills play 500 miles away in another city.

Doesn't matter, still a New York franchise. The Jets and Bills may play in different cities but then again, the Knicks and Nets now play in different Boroughs. Still DIVISION RIVALS.

Also, the Mets vs Yankees? AL East vs NL East. Giants vs Jets? AFC East vs NFC East.

Since when is it o.k (in sports) to SUPPORT A DIVISION RIVAL?!?

Laughable.

Have of habit of questioning people's loyalty?

Not questioning anyone's loyality. But, if you're supporting a division rival? Well, then, your loyality deserves to be questioned.

The Nets are a division rival, are they not? I know Melo and the rest of our Knicks consider them to be division rivals. By supporting the Nets, you're supporting a division rival... Are you not?

For a Knicks fan to support the Nets is just as bad as a Knicks fan supporting the Boston Celtics and/or Toronto Raptors ala Atlantic Division Rivals.

Being a Fan of a division rival and supporting one because it happens to be in your state and, its presence is an aid to YOUR STATE, then your showing the GREATER loyalty to your state. The benefits to New York are greater than your belief in my or others lack of loyalty.
Supporting a team, like I said and being a fan are too different thing. I rock Knicks gear, consider myself and Uber-Knick fan but, I appreciate what the Nets will do for my state. Anyone who doesn't understand this needs to get hooked on phonics because, it couldn't be clearer.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
joec32033
Posts: 30612
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
12/12/2012  10:14 AM
DurzoBlint wrote:
joec32033 wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:You know what....I've been reevaluating my feeling on the Nets. Took me a while but, now I see the irony of my supporting all New York teams in the past (jets, giants, yanks & mets) but, I chose to hate on the Nets. They aren't Jersey's team anymore but, another New York team. So, for now on, I will support the Nets but, the Knicks are my team. There is a difference between supporting a team and being a fan of it.

Having another NBA team will only help bring more revenue into the state which, is a good thing so, big ups to BK.

Are they really?? Just because a Russian Bruce Wayne moved them? If the guy did it with class MAYBE I can accept them. But the way they moved was classless. Their marketing screams "we are trying to hard". Marketing does NOT get people to invest in you emotionally. Perform. Build a legacy don't artificially produce it. What are these Brooklyn fans cheering for? The name on the front of the jersey? Guess what? Brooklyn is marketing itself as NY's team. A replacement for the Knicks. Brooklyn pride my ass. They are not the Brooklyn Nets. The are the wannabe New York Knicks.

by that logic, Dolan should have killed the Knicks fanbase. We don't support a team because of who the owner is. Sure there was some tastelessness from that side, but it doesn't discount the benefit such a team brings to the state. New York will benefit from the increased revenue and to be honest, Jersey didn't deserve a team. If you couldn't support the Jason Kidd led Nets they you shouldn't have a team.

No. I never said I anything about that. I don't care who owned the team. I didn't become a Knicks fan because of Jim Dolan. His father Charles Dolan was a great owner and was the owner when I first came in. The Knicks, Jets, Giants never marketed themselves as NJ teams. Brooklyn seems like an in to the Russian to me. In a few years watch, the nets will be angling to be the NY Nets. They use Jay-Z as Mr. Brooklyn, when he should've Mr. One Percent to match his stake in the team. Jay-Z was always about New York. My main problem is they are trying to produce a legacy. They are the NBA version of N'Sync. When they can stop feeling the need to talk about being better and from ownership on down, and actually show they aren't the B team I will have a lot more respect for them. They seembtoo manufactured for me.

~You can't run from who you are.~
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/12/2012  10:19 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Boy did the Nets make a strategic mistake sitting Blatche for the entire 2nd Q. We could not check him--if he played 44 minutes he wouldve had 34-36 and they might just have won. Hes a tough check for the Knicks.

For Tyson our Defensive player of the year Blatche and Lopez sure give him fits!

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
12/12/2012  10:20 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Boy did the Nets make a strategic mistake sitting Blatche for the entire 2nd Q. We could not check him--if he played 44 minutes he wouldve had 34-36 and they might just have won. Hes a tough check for the Knicks.

For Tyson our Defensive player of the year Blatche and Lopez sure give him fits!

Flu Tyson and Bandage Felton showed up last night.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/12/2012  10:24 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/12/2012  10:36 AM
fishmike wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:You know what....I've been reevaluating my feeling on the Nets. Took me a while but, now I see the irony of my supporting all New York teams in the past (jets, giants, yanks & mets) but, I chose to hate on the Nets. They aren't Jersey's team anymore but, another New York team. So, for now on, I will support the Nets but, the Knicks are my team. There is a difference between supporting a team and being a fan of it.

Having another NBA team will only help bring more revenue into the state which, is a good thing so, big ups to BK.
Im this way with the Jets (Giants fans first). I grew up a big blue fan but I always liked watching those Jets teams of the 80s. Ken Obrien, Al Toon, Gastineau, Freeman McNeel. I watch about half the games and hope they do well, but just cant muster and emotional attachment. Im Yanks/Gints/Knicks and thats pretty much it.

Nice to see the Nets get beat. That team presents some problems for us

I used to be like that with the Jets too but they lost my respect with the shenanigans they pulled last season. Now I'm like that with the Mets. The Yankees are so boring and predictable now. My hate for the NYets and Devils is just too deeply rooted and they are division rivals.

DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
12/12/2012  10:26 AM
joec32033 wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:
joec32033 wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:You know what....I've been reevaluating my feeling on the Nets. Took me a while but, now I see the irony of my supporting all New York teams in the past (jets, giants, yanks & mets) but, I chose to hate on the Nets. They aren't Jersey's team anymore but, another New York team. So, for now on, I will support the Nets but, the Knicks are my team. There is a difference between supporting a team and being a fan of it.

Having another NBA team will only help bring more revenue into the state which, is a good thing so, big ups to BK.

Are they really?? Just because a Russian Bruce Wayne moved them? If the guy did it with class MAYBE I can accept them. But the way they moved was classless. Their marketing screams "we are trying to hard". Marketing does NOT get people to invest in you emotionally. Perform. Build a legacy don't artificially produce it. What are these Brooklyn fans cheering for? The name on the front of the jersey? Guess what? Brooklyn is marketing itself as NY's team. A replacement for the Knicks. Brooklyn pride my ass. They are not the Brooklyn Nets. The are the wannabe New York Knicks.

by that logic, Dolan should have killed the Knicks fanbase. We don't support a team because of who the owner is. Sure there was some tastelessness from that side, but it doesn't discount the benefit such a team brings to the state. New York will benefit from the increased revenue and to be honest, Jersey didn't deserve a team. If you couldn't support the Jason Kidd led Nets they you shouldn't have a team.

No. I never said I anything about that. I don't care who owned the team. I didn't become a Knicks fan because of Jim Dolan. His father Charles Dolan was a great owner and was the owner when I first came in. The Knicks, Jets, Giants never marketed themselves as NJ teams. Brooklyn seems like an in to the Russian to me. In a few years watch, the nets will be angling to be the NY Nets. They use Jay-Z as Mr. Brooklyn, when he should've Mr. One Percent to match his stake in the team. Jay-Z was always about New York. My main problem is they are trying to produce a legacy. They are the NBA version of N'Sync. When they can stop feeling the need to talk about being better and from ownership on down, and actually show they aren't the B team I will have a lot more respect for them. They seembtoo manufactured for me.

ah, I misread your post. Loved the comment about Jay-Z. One percent,...that makes you an INVESTER, not an owner. Lmao at anyone considering him a minority owner. One percent wouldn't even give you a voice in a real corporation or company board. I own a couple of stocks which give me a greater stake than one percent but, no one would ever consider me an owner.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/12/2012  10:31 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/12/2012  10:34 AM
DurzoBlint wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Boy did the Nets make a strategic mistake sitting Blatche for the entire 2nd Q. We could not check him--if he played 44 minutes he wouldve had 34-36 and they might just have won. Hes a tough check for the Knicks.

yup, he was pretty much doing whatever he wanted out there. There is a good reason why Nets fans have been calling for Avery's head. I think he'd be best as a defensive coach. That or he needs to hire an offensive coordinator.

Yea never bought into the hype with Avery Johnson. JVG was unusually critical of a fellow member of the coaching fraternity. He seemed to be really harping on how badly designed the Net's offense was and how badly misused Dwill is in Avery's system. I think he may be onto something. Dwill was terrible under Sloan.

So is JVG campaigning for a job or just stating the obvious?

Also besides benching Blatche in the 2nd he played Stackhouse who has been slumping in the 4th while Marshon Brooks who was hot sat

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/12/2012  10:38 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Boy did the Nets make a strategic mistake sitting Blatche for the entire 2nd Q. We could not check him--if he played 44 minutes he wouldve had 34-36 and they might just have won. Hes a tough check for the Knicks.

For Tyson our Defensive player of the year Blatche and Lopez sure give him fits!

Flu Tyson and Bandage Felton showed up last night.

I don't get it. You figure he'd struggled against bigger physical Centers

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/12/2012  10:42 AM
cooch2584 wrote:
joec32033 wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:You know what....I've been reevaluating my feeling on the Nets. Took me a while but, now I see the irony of my supporting all New York teams in the past (jets, giants, yanks & mets) but, I chose to hate on the Nets. They aren't Jersey's team anymore but, another New York team. So, for now on, I will support the Nets but, the Knicks are my team. There is a difference between supporting a team and being a fan of it.

Having another NBA team will only help bring more revenue into the state which, is a good thing so, big ups to BK.

Are they really?? Just because a Russian Bruce Wayne moved them? If the guy did it with class MAYBE I can accept them. But the way they moved was classless. Their marketing screams "we are trying to hard". Marketing does NOT get people to invest in you emotionally. Perform. Build a legacy don't artificially produce it. What are these Brooklyn fans cheering for? The name on the front of the jersey? Guess what? Brooklyn is marketing itself as NY's team. A replacement for the Knicks. Brooklyn pride my ass. They are not the Brooklyn Nets. The are the wannabe New York Knicks.

Classless isnt the right word Joe. If anyone does some deep down research, the way they built that arena was illegal in every way,shape and form. They actually threw people outta their homes and had Brooklyn claim eminnant domain over the homes that people had in brooklyn. The russian paid under the table to the pols for the land. The pols wanted a team in brooklyn so bad ,thinking that they would generate money for brooklyn that they forgot how they affected peoples lives. They uprooted a whole neighborhood. MAYBE that is the reason why there are more Knicks fans at a nyets game than nyets fans. A poster on another thread,I forgot who,was at the game last nite and said there went 80% Knicks fans there,IN THE nyets ARENA. NO ONE was relocated,thrown outta their home etc... when THE WORLDS MOST FAMOUS ARENA,THE EFFING MECCA OF BASKETBALL WAS BUILT.

I remember when all that went down. Disgraceful and I wish years of bad karma on them

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/12/2012  10:44 AM
Nalod wrote:Im curious why the garden is "the mecca"? Knicks lifetime record is under .500

College ball has been irrelevant in NYC since the 50's with the exception of St Johns in the 80's.

Knicks have not won in 40 years.

Its the most famous arena because MSG in some form has existed for over 100 years and NYC is the biggest in the country!

Nets put "Brooklyn" on their jersey's. They are not proclaiming to be NY's team. their ticket sales are up 500% and we are 1-1 for the season with them.

They don't have a 60 year history and moved to rebrand and build a new identity. Knicks have theirs, Nets are finding theirs.

They are a financial success thus far.

They don't know how to finish games yet. If they did they'd be 2-0.

Would that have changed anything regarding their marketing plan, ticket sales, or tv revenue today?

Does this make me a Net fan or just someone who recognizes what a financial gain it is to the russian and for NYC?

The Rivalry is good thing and Im enjoying the hell out of it.

I agree with Durzo, I can support the Nets. Im about NY. if the Knicks don't win and the Nets go on I'd rather a team win from NY than miami, or boston, or philly, or LA, etc.........


Its the Mecca because guys like Kobe, Jordan, Lebron like to drop 61 and 55 there

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/12/2012  10:48 AM
DurzoBlint wrote:
joec32033 wrote:
DurzoBlint wrote:You know what....I've been reevaluating my feeling on the Nets. Took me a while but, now I see the irony of my supporting all New York teams in the past (jets, giants, yanks & mets) but, I chose to hate on the Nets. They aren't Jersey's team anymore but, another New York team. So, for now on, I will support the Nets but, the Knicks are my team. There is a difference between supporting a team and being a fan of it.

Having another NBA team will only help bring more revenue into the state which, is a good thing so, big ups to BK.

Are they really?? Just because a Russian Bruce Wayne moved them? If the guy did it with class MAYBE I can accept them. But the way they moved was classless. Their marketing screams "we are trying to hard". Marketing does NOT get people to invest in you emotionally. Perform. Build a legacy don't artificially produce it. What are these Brooklyn fans cheering for? The name on the front of the jersey? Guess what? Brooklyn is marketing itself as NY's team. A replacement for the Knicks. Brooklyn pride my ass. They are not the Brooklyn Nets. The are the wannabe New York Knicks.

by that logic, Dolan should have killed the Knicks fanbase. We don't support a team because of who the owner is. Sure there was some tastelessness from that side, but it doesn't discount the benefit such a team brings to the state. New York will benefit from the increased revenue and to be honest, Jersey didn't deserve a team. If you couldn't support the Jason Kidd led Nets they you shouldn't have a team.

It was hard for Jersey to support the Nyets. A lot of them are Knicks and Sixers fans. The ones that became Nyets fans during the Kidd era jumped off the knicks/sixers bandwagon and lost my respect and fueled my hatred for the franchise

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/12/2012  10:50 AM
NYKMentality wrote:
Nalod wrote:
NYKMentality wrote:No matter how you slice it, the Nets are an Atlantic division rival of the New York Knicks.

Enjoy rooting and/or supporting our division rivals... lol.

A Knicks fan supporting the Nets is the same as a Jets fan supporting the Bills. It doesn't happen. AFC East (division) rivals.

Bills play 500 miles away in another city.

Doesn't matter, still a New York franchise. The Jets and Bills may play in different cities but then again, the Knicks and Nets now play in different Boroughs. Still DIVISION RIVALS.

Also, the Mets vs Yankees? AL East vs NL East. Giants vs Jets? AFC East vs NFC East.

Since when is it o.k (in sports) to SUPPORT A DIVISION RIVAL?!?

Laughable.

I actually agree with you here. I think rooting for a division rival is absurd!

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34064
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

12/12/2012  10:50 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
Nalod wrote:Im curious why the garden is "the mecca"? Knicks lifetime record is under .500

College ball has been irrelevant in NYC since the 50's with the exception of St Johns in the 80's.

Knicks have not won in 40 years.

Its the most famous arena because MSG in some form has existed for over 100 years and NYC is the biggest in the country!

Nets put "Brooklyn" on their jersey's. They are not proclaiming to be NY's team. their ticket sales are up 500% and we are 1-1 for the season with them.

They don't have a 60 year history and moved to rebrand and build a new identity. Knicks have theirs, Nets are finding theirs.

They are a financial success thus far.

They don't know how to finish games yet. If they did they'd be 2-0.

Would that have changed anything regarding their marketing plan, ticket sales, or tv revenue today?

Does this make me a Net fan or just someone who recognizes what a financial gain it is to the russian and for NYC?

The Rivalry is good thing and Im enjoying the hell out of it.

I agree with Durzo, I can support the Nets. Im about NY. if the Knicks don't win and the Nets go on I'd rather a team win from NY than miami, or boston, or philly, or LA, etc.........


Its the Mecca because guys like Kobe, Jordan, Lebron like to drop 61 and 55 there

+1, and would just like to point out they head to The Mecca specifically to drop 61 and 55

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
12/12/2012  10:54 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
NYKMentality wrote:
Nalod wrote:
NYKMentality wrote:No matter how you slice it, the Nets are an Atlantic division rival of the New York Knicks.

Enjoy rooting and/or supporting our division rivals... lol.

A Knicks fan supporting the Nets is the same as a Jets fan supporting the Bills. It doesn't happen. AFC East (division) rivals.

Bills play 500 miles away in another city.

Doesn't matter, still a New York franchise. The Jets and Bills may play in different cities but then again, the Knicks and Nets now play in different Boroughs. Still DIVISION RIVALS.

Also, the Mets vs Yankees? AL East vs NL East. Giants vs Jets? AFC East vs NFC East.

Since when is it o.k (in sports) to SUPPORT A DIVISION RIVAL?!?

Laughable.

I actually agree with you here. I think rooting for a division rival is absurd!

keep in mind that rooting for a team and supporting it are not the same thing. Mentally, I realize its good for New York state (the revenue they will bring in) and I support that. I don't root for them to win....That's what the guy who responded to my 1st post couldn't understand.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/12/2012  10:57 AM
joec32033 wrote:
playa2 wrote:
joec32033 wrote:Dear Brooklyn,

They are still the nets.

With love,
New York.


Joeeeeeeeeeeeee,

Sup playa?

By the way joe, that was the worse ffb league i got into (more so cause i went 2-11) didn't like picking defensive players..I think espn ffb is much better (10-3)..

But on the topic of discussion, it's going to take a few years before NYK Knick fans warm up to the nets..

Most yankee fans were rooting for the mets in 86, although i was very young (12), i don't recall yankee fans upset or not rooting for the mets..It was hard not to like Carter, stawberry, Gooden and some of the other guys

The NETS don't even have a fan friendly player like that in which they root for like a Sheed, starks, spree, camby ect...Even Evans (who's easy to like because his efforts) doesn't get that kinda love, humpries is still getting heckle by some fans..

You could best believe if the knicks win it this year or even make it to the finals, the Nets will see there small fan base shrink.. Further more, you don't own the city until you go on the road and see fans wearing NETS gear..Right now the nets are a local team in a big city with just half a BORO behind them..They had a better chance taking over the city when Isaih was in town and the knicks were the joke of the league. Instead they come to town when the original home team is back on top and the darlings of the east..they say in life TIMING IS EVERYTHING...

ES
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
12/12/2012  11:10 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/12/2012  11:10 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
Nalod wrote:Im curious why the garden is "the mecca"? Knicks lifetime record is under .500

College ball has been irrelevant in NYC since the 50's with the exception of St Johns in the 80's.

Knicks have not won in 40 years.

Its the most famous arena because MSG in some form has existed for over 100 years and NYC is the biggest in the country!

Nets put "Brooklyn" on their jersey's. They are not proclaiming to be NY's team. their ticket sales are up 500% and we are 1-1 for the season with them.

They don't have a 60 year history and moved to rebrand and build a new identity. Knicks have theirs, Nets are finding theirs.

They are a financial success thus far.

They don't know how to finish games yet. If they did they'd be 2-0.

Would that have changed anything regarding their marketing plan, ticket sales, or tv revenue today?

Does this make me a Net fan or just someone who recognizes what a financial gain it is to the russian and for NYC?

The Rivalry is good thing and Im enjoying the hell out of it.

I agree with Durzo, I can support the Nets. Im about NY. if the Knicks don't win and the Nets go on I'd rather a team win from NY than miami, or boston, or philly, or LA, etc.........


Its the Mecca because guys like Kobe, Jordan, Lebron like to drop 61 and 55 there

Yeah, who remembers the Ewing era anyway, right? Some blurry 15 years or so that maybe didn't even happen.

I remember Dr J! Ebbets Field! Jackie Robinson! Winning ABA titles! The Nauseum Colonseum!

So they moved from a vacant parking lot on the Island to the Swamp. With stops at various Parkway exits along the way.

JKidd couldn't get them over that final hump (in front of maybe 5000 loyal fans), smelled the air around Elizabeth once too often to want to retire there. Got out.

The Mecca has a 60 year history. Things like Reed and the tunnel don't just happen due to enough time, money and chance.

Forget Naismith, basketball is the only city sport there is and ever has been. Shove a soccer ball up your pie hole. Baseball and Football is for suburbia, where they have space and money for sheehit like that. St. Johns holding open tryouts with a chance to be a "Storm"er does not change that.

You'll notice Kobe, Jordan, Lebron don't give a feck what the hell they scored in New Jersey. And I'm doubting that stupid floor is going to make anyone of them go "...wow...what a stage for my greatness..."

It's a second rate franchise. Like the Mets. Like the Jets.

Forget your identity seeking, your loudmouthed idiot Russian owner who probably thinks a layup is what he pays the ho 2000 rubles a night for, and the need to learn how to finish.

You are second rate franchise. Building a rivalry takes more than 20 games into a new season and alot of black and white hype.

You are not that far removed from BobCat land, and we beat them in close games too.

Play some seasons. Win something.

Come back later. Much later.

Open letter to Nets fans visiting our board

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy