Author | Thread |
knickstorrents
Posts: 21121 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/23/2010 Member: #3050 Hong Kong |
![]() jrodmc wrote:I generally respect your opinion and used your post as the focal point of the dazzling coherence of even considering the opinion of someone with such "reduced mental elevation." Among other well-overly-documented mental defects. And other run-on sentences. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem You may not like Marbury for various reasons, but if you just take his statements at face value, it is hard to argue with them. Rose is not the answer.
|
AUTOADVERT |
jrodmc
Posts: 32927 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 11/24/2004 Member: #805 USA |
![]() knickstorrents wrote:jrodmc wrote:I generally respect your opinion and used your post as the focal point of the dazzling coherence of even considering the opinion of someone with such "reduced mental elevation." Among other well-overly-documented mental defects. And other run-on sentences. You'll notice, knickstorrents, that with the possible exception of the loss of Bermanbury coverage, each of my stated precepts regarding Mr. Greasy Marbles are not at all "unrelated beliefs of the person". If a lunatic child molester presented himself to you in a straight jacket while drooling at the sight of any passing kids and stated that he held the keys to sane living, are you going to give any credence to his statements? Are you going to really waste time taking notes and balancing the possibility of any value he may have on the subject? My statements on Marbury are not ad hominem attacks. They're simply showing that he has little to no credibility on the subject he's elaborating on. End of story. |