[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks Off-season Report Card
Author Thread
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

8/15/2012  12:00 PM
CashMoney wrote:
loweyecue wrote:If Melo gets hurt or is shooting 2-13 from the field we are going to average 50-60 points a game unless someone else steps up with Linsanity type numbers. Our defense is again being overrated. We have very little perimeter defense good outside shooting teams will kill us. We also have no speed on defense opposing team fast breaks will be brutal to watch. Shumpert will be a big part of the equation if he plays at the levels he showed before but who knows if he will even play this season.

The hope is both Melo and Amare play the way the way they should but should one have an off night it's the others job to get it done. I don't think our defense is being overrated. This team should be in the top 10 if not better considering we upgraded and held teams to 94.65 points per game last year. What does speed on fast break defense have to do with anything? I think Shump will play but I'm not expecting the player we saw last year unitl the 2013-2014 season.

Hope is not a strategy. How did that work out last year?
Our team has very few options on offense and a long list of "IF"s for things to fall in place. Not a credible high percentage outcome. We did not address our needs on offense, which was mostly stagnant and one dimensional under Woody. ( Yeah I have already read the long list of excuses).

Our defense was already top 5 in the league wasn't it? The improvement from adding 40 year old bench players will be marginal at best. On the other hand we were rated 17th on offense. This may easily slide to the low 20s, given our offseason moves and choice of coaching. (Both ranks are from Basketball-Rederence)

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
AUTOADVERT
ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/15/2012  12:22 PM
loweyecue wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
loweyecue wrote:If Melo gets hurt or is shooting 2-13 from the field we are going to average 50-60 points a game unless someone else steps up with Linsanity type numbers. Our defense is again being overrated. We have very little perimeter defense good outside shooting teams will kill us. We also have no speed on defense opposing team fast breaks will be brutal to watch. Shumpert will be a big part of the equation if he plays at the levels he showed before but who knows if he will even play this season.

The hope is both Melo and Amare play the way the way they should but should one have an off night it's the others job to get it done. I don't think our defense is being overrated. This team should be in the top 10 if not better considering we upgraded and held teams to 94.65 points per game last year. What does speed on fast break defense have to do with anything? I think Shump will play but I'm not expecting the player we saw last year unitl the 2013-2014 season.

Hope is not a strategy. How did that work out last year?
Our team has very few options on offense and a long list of "IF"s for things to fall in place. Not a credible high percentage outcome. We did not address our needs on offense, which was mostly stagnant and one dimensional under Woody. ( Yeah I have already read the long list of excuses).

Our defense was already top 5 in the league wasn't it? The improvement from adding 40 year old bench players will be marginal at best. On the other hand we were rated 17th on offense. This may easily slide to the low 20s, given our offseason moves and choice of coaching. (Both ranks are from Basketball-Rederence)

Good thing the games are played on the court not on Basketball Reference or on an Internet forum.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
8/15/2012  12:50 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/15/2012  12:52 PM
I go back to when the aspirations were to get Lebron and win a championship. Instead we got Amare and Melo both have flaws. Melo has less flaw but needs to learn when not too force shots. So here we are today looking at a 3rd or 4th seed and a longshot to getting to the finals. And the worst part is we are stuck with this core and no youth to improve the team. Not much to get excited about when you havent won since 73. No difference in being a 7th or 3rd seed
fishmike
Posts: 53856
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/15/2012  3:29 PM
Losing Lin is a loss. It just is. It's possible he never recaptures that magic he had those few weeks in February. But it was worth it to try. For a franchise that has historically and consistently not cared a bit about how much money they spend, to become frugal over a guy with that kind of upside and the way the fans reacted to him is almost cruel.
this is everything you need to know about this offseason summed up perfectly. Took the words out of my mouth. If you cant see this your seriously lost.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
8/15/2012  3:32 PM
loweyecue wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
loweyecue wrote:If Melo gets hurt or is shooting 2-13 from the field we are going to average 50-60 points a game unless someone else steps up with Linsanity type numbers. Our defense is again being overrated. We have very little perimeter defense good outside shooting teams will kill us. We also have no speed on defense opposing team fast breaks will be brutal to watch. Shumpert will be a big part of the equation if he plays at the levels he showed before but who knows if he will even play this season.

The hope is both Melo and Amare play the way the way they should but should one have an off night it's the others job to get it done. I don't think our defense is being overrated. This team should be in the top 10 if not better considering we upgraded and held teams to 94.65 points per game last year. What does speed on fast break defense have to do with anything? I think Shump will play but I'm not expecting the player we saw last year unitl the 2013-2014 season.

Hope is not a strategy. How did that work out last year?
Our team has very few options on offense and a long list of "IF"s for things to fall in place. Not a credible high percentage outcome. We did not address our needs on offense, which was mostly stagnant and one dimensional under Woody. ( Yeah I have already read the long list of excuses).

Our defense was already top 5 in the league wasn't it? The improvement from adding 40 year old bench players will be marginal at best. On the other hand we were rated 17th on offense. This may easily slide to the low 20s, given our offseason moves and choice of coaching. (Both ranks are from Basketball-Rederence)

Last year was a train wreck. No traning camp, condensed schedule and NO PG. 17th on offense last year? Thinking about this logically we had a grand total of 7 GAMES where we had Melo, Amare and an actual healthy and competent PG in Lin playing together at the same time. 7 GAMES! Baron did we he could but the guy was not close to playing injury free at any point last year and we all know all too well about TD. Melo and Amare played a total of 40 games together during the regular season and 7 with a PG.

This is the FIRST TIME Melo and Amare have had a FULL TRAINING CAMP TOGETHER along with an actual PG. Our offense will be fine. We averaged 96 points per game Under Woody and gave up 91 pts per game under Woody. Based on last years stats, sustaining that level of play for the full season would have put is in the middle of the pack on offense and top 5 on defense.

I can care less about the ages of our backups. The bottom line is that they both can play and give us exactly what we lacked last year. This is the best team we've had in over 10 years. I'm optimistic and excited about this year. Seems to me that you're choosing to go the other way.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
8/15/2012  3:35 PM
fishmike wrote:
Losing Lin is a loss. It just is. It's possible he never recaptures that magic he had those few weeks in February. But it was worth it to try. For a franchise that has historically and consistently not cared a bit about how much money they spend, to become frugal over a guy with that kind of upside and the way the fans reacted to him is almost cruel.
this is everything you need to know about this offseason summed up perfectly. Took the words out of my mouth. If you cant see this your seriously lost.

Call me lost then.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/15/2012  3:44 PM
I'd give Grunwald an A- butn Maybe I'm just a Kool-Aid drinker. I'm upset about losing Lin and only Luke-warm about Felton, but I think Kidd, Camby, and Brewer are outstanding additions and the team is significantly improved from last year.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/15/2012  4:10 PM
We're pretty close to what the Bulls situations was. A team that is really dependent on one guy being great and staying healthy. If we had kept Lin, then we had at least another guy that we know could make things happen even if we lost Melo due to injury. It just feels like we're very vulnerable to the success and health of Melo. He's got to be the guy he's been most of his career at the least. He can't have another year like last year. I'm fairly confident that he'll play well and that's the only saving grace for this plan Dolan, Glen and Woody have put together.

Still this is not a very dynamic team offensively and we're gonna have to slow teams down to win games. I could be wrong about that, but just from looking at the rotation guys it doesn't look like a team made to put up big scoring numbers.

skeng
Posts: 22090
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 10/27/2009
Member: #2959
Denmark
8/15/2012  5:43 PM
Three words for our off-season. Solid, Boring and Dissappointing. Not having Lin back was dissappointing. Adding guys like Kidd, Felton, Camby and Brewer was good additions. But lacks jazz. I think this is the first time for me to be rooting for a knick team without at least one yoot competing for us. Hopefully Shump makes it back and can crack the rotation, but damn.
Legalize di NBA
JamesLin
Posts: 20625
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/17/2012
Member: #3944
USA
8/15/2012  6:11 PM
VCoug wrote:
The only thing I slightly disagree with is choice of coach. Let's be honest, choosing Mike Woodson over Phil Jackson is monumentally stupid but there are worse choices than Woodson. I think the fact that at least we have a capable choice deserves better than an F, not an A but maybe a B- or C+.

Phil Jackson never wanted to coach Knicks. Where did you read that? We wanted him, sure, but he never indicated anything or consideration for the Knicks. Then when all set in stones, he even mocked the Knicks.

Get busy living or get busy dying. ---- Andy Dufresne
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
8/15/2012  6:30 PM
I think many over rate, our additions, by saying how DEEP we became.

Felton may defend better than Lin.
But he simply should not be compared with his penetration, handle, IQ, shooting, ability to finish, speed/quickness.

Jason Kidd is a bigger version of Bibby, neither has the ability to penetrate.
With his size, he can defend some bigger stronger guards, but cannot stay in front of quick guards, especially with athleticism.
Kidd was signed to be mentor, he simply cannot be an impact as a 39+.
We don't even have anyone that can be developed/benefit from absorbing the knowledge of the vets that we added.

While Pablo might penetrate slightly better than Kidd, they are both horrible.
They are both pass first PG's but they do not have the ability to penetrate/finish to attack and break down any decent opponents defense.
I consider them both similar players, while I would have preferred Nate Robinson with his ability to penetrate and finish for the minimum veterans exception.

Honestly, I would have Patty Mills/Nate Robinson and many other players for the veterans minimum than Kidd/Pablo, and use the money elsewhere, like for Delfino.

Camby is a better Center than Jeffries, but he isn't the versatile defender ON THE BALL, that Jeffries is.
He is a help great weak side help defender, but Jeffries brings a lot to the table that stats simply do not show.
We did not find a player that replaces what Jeffries brings.
Kurt Thomas cannot defend SF/PF's, and guards, he is a 3rd string undersized Center at best.
Whether Camby can coexist with Tyson Chandler together, and compliment Amare better than Tyson would be the difference.
Camby would give us another player outside of Chandler that can rebound, block shots, and defend the paint at center.
Having Jeffries as the primary defender for the SF,PF,C (Ex. will be defending the Kevin Loves, Dirks, Lebron etc,) and having Camby and/or Tyson as the help defenders, behind him would have been ideal.
Simply put, they are apples and oranges, and cannot be compared for one another, we actually would miss what Jeffries brings to the table.

Brewer was a great addition, especially for the price.
Especially him being vocal about "Standing AROUND, and watching Melo go 1v1"

CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
8/15/2012  6:34 PM
JamesLin wrote:
VCoug wrote:
The only thing I slightly disagree with is choice of coach. Let's be honest, choosing Mike Woodson over Phil Jackson is monumentally stupid but there are worse choices than Woodson. I think the fact that at least we have a capable choice deserves better than an F, not an A but maybe a B- or C+.

Phil Jackson never wanted to coach Knicks. Where did you read that? We wanted him, sure, but he never indicated anything or consideration for the Knicks. Then when all set in stones, he even mocked the Knicks.

Phil Jackson says he wouldn't have wanted to coach the New York Knicks -- even if the team asked.

"I wasn't gonna take that job; that's for sure," he told HBO's "Real Sports" in an interview scheduled to air Tuesday night.


ALSO..... Jackson said the Knicks and Orlando Magic openings this offseason were not the positions to bring him back to the bench.

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nba/story/_/id/8058726/phil-jackson-says-coach-clumsy-new-york-knicks-team

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
8/15/2012  6:44 PM
RonRon wrote:I think many over rate, our additions, by saying how DEEP we became.

Felton may defend better than Lin.
But he simply should not be compared with his penetration, handle, IQ, shooting, ability to finish, speed/quickness.

Jason Kidd is a bigger version of Bibby, neither has the ability to penetrate.
With his size, he can defend some bigger stronger guards, but cannot stay in front of quick guards, especially with athleticism.
Kidd was signed to be mentor, he simply cannot be an impact as a 39+.
We don't even have anyone that can be developed/benefit from absorbing the knowledge of the vets that we added.

While Pablo might penetrate slightly better than Kidd, they are both horrible.
They are both pass first PG's but they do not have the ability to penetrate/finish to attack and break down any decent opponents defense.
I consider them both similar players, while I would have preferred Nate Robinson with his ability to penetrate and finish for the minimum veterans exception.

Honestly, I would have Patty Mills/Nate Robinson and many other players for the veterans minimum than Kidd/Pablo, and use the money elsewhere, like for Delfino.

Camby is a better Center than Jeffries, but he isn't the versatile defender ON THE BALL, that Jeffries is.
He is a help great weak side help defender, but Jeffries brings a lot to the table that stats simply do not show.
We did not find a player that replaces what Jeffries brings.
Kurt Thomas cannot defend SF/PF's, and guards, he is a 3rd string undersized Center at best.
Whether Camby can coexist with Tyson Chandler together, and compliment Amare better than Tyson would be the difference.
Camby would give us another player outside of Chandler that can rebound, block shots, and defend the paint at center.
Having Jeffries as the primary defender for the SF,PF,C (Ex. will be defending the Kevin Loves, Dirks, Lebron etc,) and having Camby and/or Tyson as the help defenders, behind him would have been ideal.
Simply put, they are apples and oranges, and cannot be compared for one another, we actually would miss what Jeffries brings to the table.

Brewer was a great addition, especially for the price.
Especially him being vocal about "Standing AROUND, and watching Melo go 1v1"

Felton is not a star but the guy has a handle, can drive and dish which is what we need. He's not as quick as Lin but he won't turn the ball over as much either. Lin may turn out to be the better player in a few years but for right now IMHO it's a wash. Besides, nt telling what Lin is and what he's going to be until the seaon is in play.

Kidd can't penetrate like he used to but he can run an offense and will put the ball where needed for easy hoops. Another thing is that he can play and defend the 2 as well. Either way Kidd/Prigs > Davis/Bibby.

Jeffries wiil be missed for his hustle and D but I won't miss the constant bricks on wide open shots as well as blown layups. Besides, I think his knee condition will keep him on the becnh more often than the floor. Jeffries brought energy but with the exception of drawing charges the guy was useless. We can resign him once Portland releases him sometime next year.

We were deep last year as in Mobb Deep and the team is now better. How are we not deep?

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
8/15/2012  10:15 PM
CashMoney wrote:
RonRon wrote:I think many over rate, our additions, by saying how DEEP we became.

Felton may defend better than Lin.
But he simply should not be compared with his penetration, handle, IQ, shooting, ability to finish, speed/quickness.

Jason Kidd is a bigger version of Bibby, neither has the ability to penetrate.
With his size, he can defend some bigger stronger guards, but cannot stay in front of quick guards, especially with athleticism.
Kidd was signed to be mentor, he simply cannot be an impact as a 39+.
We don't even have anyone that can be developed/benefit from absorbing the knowledge of the vets that we added.

While Pablo might penetrate slightly better than Kidd, they are both horrible.
They are both pass first PG's but they do not have the ability to penetrate/finish to attack and break down any decent opponents defense.
I consider them both similar players, while I would have preferred Nate Robinson with his ability to penetrate and finish for the minimum veterans exception.

Honestly, I would have Patty Mills/Nate Robinson and many other players for the veterans minimum than Kidd/Pablo, and use the money elsewhere, like for Delfino.

Camby is a better Center than Jeffries, but he isn't the versatile defender ON THE BALL, that Jeffries is.
He is a help great weak side help defender, but Jeffries brings a lot to the table that stats simply do not show.
We did not find a player that replaces what Jeffries brings.
Kurt Thomas cannot defend SF/PF's, and guards, he is a 3rd string undersized Center at best.
Whether Camby can coexist with Tyson Chandler together, and compliment Amare better than Tyson would be the difference.
Camby would give us another player outside of Chandler that can rebound, block shots, and defend the paint at center.
Having Jeffries as the primary defender for the SF,PF,C (Ex. will be defending the Kevin Loves, Dirks, Lebron etc,) and having Camby and/or Tyson as the help defenders, behind him would have been ideal.
Simply put, they are apples and oranges, and cannot be compared for one another, we actually would miss what Jeffries brings to the table.

Brewer was a great addition, especially for the price.
Especially him being vocal about "Standing AROUND, and watching Melo go 1v1"

Felton is not a star but the guy has a handle, can drive and dish which is what we need. He's not as quick as Lin but he won't turn the ball over as much either. Lin may turn out to be the better player in a few years but for right now IMHO it's a wash. Besides, nt telling what Lin is and what he's going to be until the seaon is in play.

Kidd can't penetrate like he used to but he can run an offense and will put the ball where needed for easy hoops. Another thing is that he can play and defend the 2 as well. Either way Kidd/Prigs > Davis/Bibby.

Jeffries wiil be missed for his hustle and D but I won't miss the constant bricks on wide open shots as well as blown layups. Besides, I think his knee condition will keep him on the becnh more often than the floor. Jeffries brought energy but with the exception of drawing charges the guy was useless. We can resign him once Portland releases him sometime next year.

We were deep last year as in Mobb Deep and the team is now better. How are we not deep?

I am saying we aren't as good as some of us think, we are no where near the deepest team in the league.

Our starting 5 or finishing 5, is the still more basically the same, without Lin.
Can Melo, Amare, Tyson Chandler still work together vs the elite teams?

We improved by replacing

Baron Davis/Bibby with Kidd/Pablo but Baron Davis and Bibby were HORRIBLE, it doesn't say much.

Jeffries defense was a big part of Linsanity when he was healthy with his defense and versatility that STATS will not show.
We have no one to fill his role.

Camby/Kurt Thomas/STAT no one can go out to defense the to defend the versatile PF/C with range, in the league.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/16/2012  1:59 AM
RonRon wrote:I think many over rate, our additions, by saying how DEEP we became.

Felton may defend better than Lin.
But he simply should not be compared with his penetration, handle, IQ, shooting, ability to finish, speed/quickness.

Jason Kidd is a bigger version of Bibby, neither has the ability to penetrate.
With his size, he can defend some bigger stronger guards, but cannot stay in front of quick guards, especially with athleticism.
Kidd was signed to be mentor, he simply cannot be an impact as a 39+.
We don't even have anyone that can be developed/benefit from absorbing the knowledge of the vets that we added.

While Pablo might penetrate slightly better than Kidd, they are both horrible.
They are both pass first PG's but they do not have the ability to penetrate/finish to attack and break down any decent opponents defense.
I consider them both similar players, while I would have preferred Nate Robinson with his ability to penetrate and finish for the minimum veterans exception.

Honestly, I would have Patty Mills/Nate Robinson and many other players for the veterans minimum than Kidd/Pablo, and use the money elsewhere, like for Delfino.

Camby is a better Center than Jeffries, but he isn't the versatile defender ON THE BALL, that Jeffries is.
He is a help great weak side help defender, but Jeffries brings a lot to the table that stats simply do not show.
We did not find a player that replaces what Jeffries brings.
Kurt Thomas cannot defend SF/PF's, and guards, he is a 3rd string undersized Center at best.
Whether Camby can coexist with Tyson Chandler together, and compliment Amare better than Tyson would be the difference.
Camby would give us another player outside of Chandler that can rebound, block shots, and defend the paint at center.
Having Jeffries as the primary defender for the SF,PF,C (Ex. will be defending the Kevin Loves, Dirks, Lebron etc,) and having Camby and/or Tyson as the help defenders, behind him would have been ideal.
Simply put, they are apples and oranges, and cannot be compared for one another, we actually would miss what Jeffries brings to the table.

Brewer was a great addition, especially for the price.
Especially him being vocal about "Standing AROUND, and watching Melo go 1v1"


First off, I don't know if Jeffries is going to play in the nba again. The last report I read about him was that he was having platelet therapy on his balky knee. He is a warrior and I hope he makes it back but I don't think moving on from him at this point was a mistake.

I think you are really undervaluing Kidd. I think as a teammate and locker room presence he has Messier like qualities. His game may not be what it was but his knowledge, and leadership are tremendous. I think on this team his role will be huge. It will be interesting to see if he has a starting position in the back court to give him more juice in the locker room and on the practice floor. I wouldn't rule it out but I think his minutes will be limited.

I get really frustrated when guys dismiss the signing of Pablo. He is going to make 488,000 next year. His cap hit is almost 800,000 less than the vet min guy. He also is reported to be a guy the Knicks have been interested in for several years. I don't know how anyone questions this move. The guy is coming in with a terrrific resume and is being paid almost nothing by nba standards. Suggesting to bring back a hardhead like Nate for more money when you are trying to compete for a championship and balance the cap doesn't make any sense to me.

Getting Camby in my opinion was brilliant. For all of the praise of Chandler and his defense, he seemed to acquire fouls at a quick rate and also gets hurt or ill frequently. Camby is still a beast. If Amare or Chandler struggle having Camby as the first guy off the bench is an amazing advantage over other teams. Camby isn't playing 40 minutes but he is very productive on the court. Not sure that Jordan, or Jorts come anywhere close to the numbers he puts up this year anytime in their career. I guess it will depend on what opportunities they get if they are picked up off of waivers.

I think Thomas is just going to play the role Terry Cummings did for the Knicks. Bang the sh@t out of guys, frustrate them, and get them into foul trouble in limited minutes. Again, I don't see Jorts or Jordan fitting that role whenever they are signed by another team and I am not sure how much or if Jeffries is able to play.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
y2zipper
Posts: 20946
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2010
Member: #3287

8/16/2012  4:04 PM
The offseason was pretty good for me considering the expectations. Yes, this team winning is going to depend on Amar'e, Chandler and Melo being able to work together, but they're the core players Those three aren't going anywhere. I didn't expect to lose Lin, but Lin for Felton is a wash right now and Felton's a better defender. I would have liked to do better than Jason Kidd behind Felon. He's certainly better than Bibby and Baron Davis, though. It doesn't say much, but it's an upgrade in a situation where there's no money. Offensively this team is going through Melo with the ball or Felton with the ball mostly. That's not ideal but the identity is clearly on the defensive side of the ball. This was a top five squad last year that got better.

Getting J.R. Smith to re-up, getting Camby and getting Brewer are nothing short of brilliant moves for the Knicks. The Knicks weren't going to do better than Camby's production on the boards and defensively almost anywhere. The Pablo signing really isn't going to matter because he won't see much playing time barring injury.

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34061
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

8/20/2012  3:34 PM
I'd give a B - . Not a great offseason by any stretch but there was quality depth added. I would have liked to have kept Lin but he decided to leave. Can't blame him but he's also not worth max money any time soon. If Lin signs that deal he comes Allan Houston part 2. People would grow to hate him because he got paid much more than he deserved
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Nalod
Posts: 71219
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/20/2012  3:41 PM
We assume we get PreMelo Felton to work the pick and roll.

Do we get the Fat Felton? Is Brewer that much better than Lando?

PreMelo Felton was not as good as Linsanity so we can take it all down a notch.

Grade is a "C" but you know we really did not have to do much this offseason.

Its about internal growth. Amare working the Dream Shake, Melo being is good shape, Novak working on his handle just a bit, and the coaches cookin up a scheme to mix the ingrediants to yeild a better result. I don't think we had to hit any home runs.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
8/20/2012  4:02 PM
And we are getting felton without mda who is a career 40% fg and 29% 3pt shooter
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

8/21/2012  12:32 AM
gunsnewing wrote:And we are getting felton without mda who is a career 40% fg and 29% 3pt shooter

Hard to judge a player that way.

Lin shot a combined 34% on the road against team > .500 at home - and in MSG vs teams that were > .500 on the road.

So, which Lin would we have gotten? The one who has a good FG% against bad teams or the one who has an awful FG% against the good teams?

Lets hope we get a Felton that plays well with Amare and team.

Knicks Off-season Report Card

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy