[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

3 years from now
Author Thread
ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/14/2012  10:07 AM
In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!
AUTOADVERT
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

8/14/2012  7:18 PM
Solace wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Dolan does a complete roster purge every 2 years. Looking at our roster now and speculating on 3 years from now is pointless.

Yes, but as recent patterns also show, we eventually get Knicks who were traded years back traded back to us. Which former Knicks do you want returning in 3 years? Gallinari a Knick again? The Mayor?

No first we have to go through Frye, Ariza and Nate - probably Lee and Randolph too (I mean Zach not the other imbecile).

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

8/14/2012  8:16 PM
CashMoney wrote:In 3 years we'll fondly look back and jump for joy that the Knicks delivered a championship.

Well ... even we do win a ring, doing it the ugly way / ISO ball, and not the beautiful spread your offense way will be no fun for me but that's just me. My main goal is watching pretty basketball.

mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

8/14/2012  8:17 PM
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

8/14/2012  8:42 PM
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you ever consider changing your handle, I humbly suggest: WeedKoolAid

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/14/2012  11:50 PM
In 3 years Dolan will move Knicks to New Jersey to piss off Spike and NYC fans...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
8/14/2012  11:57 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

KLove for sure. The guy doesn't block many shots but he rebounds, is solid from the line, can knock down a 3 and has a POST GAME.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

8/15/2012  2:23 AM
CashMoney wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

KLove for sure. The guy doesn't block many shots but he rebounds, is solid from the line, can knock down a 3 and has a POST GAME.

Coach K came to the same conclusion.

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/15/2012  8:32 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

If we could replace Tyson with a capable big, of course Kevin Love.

EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

8/15/2012  8:35 AM
3 years ago we never thought we would have had the roster we have now.....

Anything is possible....

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/15/2012  8:36 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

KLove for sure. The guy doesn't block many shots but he rebounds, is solid from the line, can knock down a 3 and has a POST GAME.

Coach K came to the same conclusion.


You mean because he gave Love 5 more mpg than an injured Tyson?
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

8/15/2012  9:08 AM
Brandon Jennings development is interesting too....he could be in position to sign with us in a few years....he might bulk up a little and improv his shooting and floor game by then then. 3 years is an eternity in pro sports.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

8/15/2012  10:20 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

KLove for sure. The guy doesn't block many shots but he rebounds, is solid from the line, can knock down a 3 and has a POST GAME.

Coach K came to the same conclusion.


You mean because he gave Love 5 more mpg than an injured Tyson?

Uh no.

Because Tyson did not fit into their offense because he thought it might not be better to play 4 on 5.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/15/2012  10:27 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

KLove for sure. The guy doesn't block many shots but he rebounds, is solid from the line, can knock down a 3 and has a POST GAME.

Coach K came to the same conclusion.


You mean because he gave Love 5 more mpg than an injured Tyson?

Uh no.

Because Tyson did not fit into their offense because he thought it might not be better to play 4 on 5.


Right, and your evidence for that assertion is that he played Love 5 more mpg than the injured Tyson.
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

8/15/2012  11:05 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/15/2012  11:08 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

KLove for sure. The guy doesn't block many shots but he rebounds, is solid from the line, can knock down a 3 and has a POST GAME.

Coach K came to the same conclusion.


You mean because he gave Love 5 more mpg than an injured Tyson?

Uh no.

Because Tyson did not fit into their offense because he thought it might not be better to play 4 on 5.


Right, and your evidence for that assertion is that he played Love 5 more mpg than the injured Tyson.


17 vs 11 minutes does say a lot, so to answer your question, Yes.

Also, crunch time minutes make a difference as well.

Chandler was unfortunately underutilized. Krzyzewski danced around questions regarding Chandler’s minimized role, saying teams went small and the matchups weren’t right. But against Spain, with the big Gasol brothers and Serge Ibaka, Chandler’s size was desperately needed, but Coach K turned to Kevin Love because he’s a better perimeter shooter, better defensive rebounder and less prone to fouls.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/knicks/teamwork_was_not_on_olympic_agenda_DjvFlmsvRwXTLpuv8UmnZI#ixzz23cylqUt6

Nalod
Posts: 71218
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/15/2012  11:10 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

KLove for sure. The guy doesn't block many shots but he rebounds, is solid from the line, can knock down a 3 and has a POST GAME.

Coach K came to the same conclusion.


You mean because he gave Love 5 more mpg than an injured Tyson?

Uh no.

Because Tyson did not fit into their offense because he thought it might not be better to play 4 on 5.


Right, and your evidence for that assertion is that he played Love 5 more mpg than the injured Tyson.

Got 50% more minutes!

Look at the actual games not avg minutes.

Tyson got into foul trouble also.

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/15/2012  11:28 AM
Nalod wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:In 3 years, I'd love to have K Love, but seems like it'd be a luxury to have with Chandler here. Reload with Kyrie Irving instead to lead the finest backcourt in Irving and Shumpert in the NBA!

If you had a choice, who would you rather have KLove or Chandler?

KLove for sure. The guy doesn't block many shots but he rebounds, is solid from the line, can knock down a 3 and has a POST GAME.

Coach K came to the same conclusion.


You mean because he gave Love 5 more mpg than an injured Tyson?

Uh no.

Because Tyson did not fit into their offense because he thought it might not be better to play 4 on 5.


Right, and your evidence for that assertion is that he played Love 5 more mpg than the injured Tyson.

Got 50% more minutes!

Look at the actual games not avg minutes.

Tyson got into foul trouble also.

5 more minutes a game is alot in Olympic play. There's only 10 minutes a quarter.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/15/2012  11:51 AM
Between Love and Chandler, the better player is whichever one is 100% healthy.
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

8/15/2012  11:59 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:Between Love and Chandler, the better player is whichever one is 100% healthy.

Chandler is never really healthy so that would be KLove.

KL is a max money player and chandler is not. KL is far more valuable.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
8/15/2012  12:59 PM
Best part about bringing in Camby is that when Tyson gets into foul trouble which is all the time we wont get crushed. That is a biggest reason i was excited about this team until the Lin debacle
3 years from now

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy