franco12 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:fishmike wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:fishmike wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Knicksfan wrote:Really, who cares who is the best player on the Knicks?Our strength as a team and our hopes for success rely on our team work, not on a single player. Yes, Melo picked us up at the end of the season, as much as Lin picked us up before that. Tyson Chandler picked us up on defense all season long. J.R. picked us pu when he was signed. Novack picked us up... Well, you see the trend.
We are a team and we move forward as one.
Nyah huh! Acoording to Fishmike, Amare Stoudemire is the best player on the Knicks, and we should run Pick and Rolls exclusively on offense for 48 minutes. Amare scoring 25 pts on 54 FG% will negate any need for defense from Chandler. Anything we get from Melo is a bonus.
I see you battered fan syndrome is making you delusional, but yes... if both players are 100% then Amare is the better more valuable. Not even close. Amare's health is the key to the season.You are correct however... if you have two guys who score 25ppg and one does it at 54% and the other at 47% the 54% guy should shoot more. Boo ya!
Remind me. When was the last time Amare Stoudemire averaged 54% or more for a whole season? Was there a little guy called Nash there?
his first year with the Knicks. In comes Amare, he gives you 25ppg on over 50% shooting and Knicks go from lottery team to playoff team.Funny.. your good at copy and pasting things from other forums but you cant look up stats? Go look up Melo's BEST CAREER FG%. Notice anything funny? He wasnt the primary scorer... See? Melo is actually a better player when he's playing 2nd fiddle. Boo ya!
Dont tell Dolan what you find...
Wrong. Right Amare averaged 50% his first year of the Knicks.
Fixed it for you.
I guess logic, nuance, thinking and reading are all challenges for you.
Good try. The question was when was the last time Amare Stoudemire averaged over 54% for a whole season. Last I checked 50% is less than 54%. Maybe we need some math classes instead.
