Bonn1997 wrote:Gymkata wrote:I think six to seven good players would sound nice, but the logistics of actually getting them? Tough. And don't forget, we're currently living in a reality where Landry Fields--God bless his heart--is set to make $20 million, Omer Asik is worth $25 million over three years and Roy Hibbert is a max contract guy. That is Linsane.
Our team as currently constituted has problems for sure, but what's the best case scenario the other way? The planets align and we're the 76ers for a few years before our "good players" are drastically overpaid?
The best case scenario the other way is that we're OKC or we used our desirable assets to get players like the Heat have now. The key is to have as many assets as possible and to hold onto until you truly are getting something worthy of them.
True, but look at those respective situations and how tough they are to replicate. No team is going to let a LeBron/Bosh star walk in FA anymore, so these super teams coming together sans big-time trades are a relic of the past. And OKC? Love that team, but their core is three legit max contract guys (one of whom is likely walking), shrewdly taken in the draft after years of perpetual on-court humiliation. So you're not only going to have to suck for a long period of time, you'll also have to a) have the ping pong balls go your way and b) make sure you hit on your picks. Maybe you get Durant. Or maybe you get Oden. Maybe you get Rose. Or maybe you get Beasley.
Not to mention, the Knicks already forfeited two seasons in pursuit of big-name free agents. There is no way--especially with Brooklyn making noise--that the fans or front office will abide by more sustained years of pathetic play for a shot at that blueprint.
And what Heat-like players are you talking about? Surely not LeBron or Wade-calibers so, who? Battier? Chalmers?
I know where you're coming from and there's a big part of me that's sympathetic, but, sadly, this is the NBA, not a Disney movie. Even the Hickory Huskers had Jimmy Chitwood.