[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If the Knicks give up on Iman Shumpert I swear....
Author Thread
DJMUSIC
Posts: 22906
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/30/2007
Member: #1283

7/4/2012  7:35 PM
quite funny here now Shumpert is hurt and recovering all thinks S.Nash is the quick fix answer to NBA Title

Oh man we're in trouble on this board.

Sometimes the best deal to make is NO DEAL at all

Knicks going to bl_ow up team again and fans will be sorry same ones craving quick fixes

We just won the Larry Bird rights & neither Novac or Lin may be here! Include Shumpert missing to another NBA Team.

We all love Amare so much, it dont matter this man cant play a full season nor help this team unless KNICKS already a very good team

oh well

Turntable Musiclover & Mix-Master-ologist
AUTOADVERT
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

7/4/2012  7:52 PM
I'll ask the same question I've asked a number of times regarding Nash: How do you go all out to acquire a player who became a superstar in a system of play that your present star rejected to the point where he literally shut down his effort because he was unhappy with how the coach wanted things done?

I'll ask another: How do you expect to compete when you'll have three players- Nash, Amare, and Anthony, who are known to be below average defenders, on the court at the same time for long periods of time?

Heck- let me keep on going: How do you expect Nash to operate in a system where it will be conceivable that he will not have solid 3 pt shooters to spread the floor and give him the room he needs to operate and the targets he needs to be effective?


Honestly, this is one of the most idiotic things this team has thought about doing in a long time. It is purely reactive and makes no basketball sense.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
IrishKnickFan
Posts: 23223
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2012
Member: #4171

7/4/2012  7:55 PM
Paladin55 wrote:I'll ask the same question I've asked a number of times regarding Nash: How do you go all out to acquire a player who became a superstar in a system of play that your present star rejected to the point where he literally shut down his effort because he was unhappy with how the coach wanted things done?

I'll ask another: How do you expect to compete when you'll have three players- Nash, Amare, and Anthony, who are known to be below average defenders, on the court at the same time for long periods of time?

Heck- let me keep on going: How do you expect Nash to operate in a system where it will be conceivable that he will not have solid 3 pt shooters to spread the floor and give him the room he needs to operate and the targets he needs to be effective?


Honestly, this is one of the most idiotic things this team has thought about doing in a long time. It is purely reactive and makes no basketball sense.

well either way we are not gonna have shump anyway for most if not all next year
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/4/2012  7:57 PM
Paladin55 wrote:I'll ask the same question I've asked a number of times regarding Nash: How do you go all out to acquire a player who became a superstar in a system of play that your present star rejected to the point where he literally shut down his effort because he was unhappy with how the coach wanted things done?

I'll ask another: How do you expect to compete when you'll have three players- Nash, Amare, and Anthony, who are known to be below average defenders, on the court at the same time for long periods of time?

Heck- let me keep on going: How do you expect Nash to operate in a system where it will be conceivable that he will not have solid 3 pt shooters to spread the floor and give him the room he needs to operate and the targets he needs to be effective?


Honestly, this is one of the most idiotic things this team has thought about doing in a long time. It is purely reactive and makes no basketball sense.


Amen
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/4/2012  7:58 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/4/2012  8:00 PM
DJMUSIC wrote:quite funny here now Shumpert is hurt and recovering all thinks S.Nash is the quick fix answer to NBA Title

Oh man we're in trouble on this board.

Sometimes the best deal to make is NO DEAL at all

Knicks going to bl_ow up team again and fans will be sorry same ones craving quick fixes

We just won the Larry Bird rights & neither Novac or Lin may be here! Include Shumpert missing to another NBA Team.

We all love Amare so much, it dont matter this man cant play a full season nor help this team unless KNICKS already a very good team

oh well

amen to this too we win the bird rights case and still lose shump, lin & novak & jr. best move is no move for nash. Give me kidd, camby & sg and im ready to take on miami & boston. Nets not getting howard or illyasova who just resigned with the Bucks
VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

7/4/2012  8:19 PM
Paladin55 wrote:I'll ask the same question I've asked a number of times regarding Nash: How do you go all out to acquire a player who became a superstar in a system of play that your present star rejected to the point where he literally shut down his effort because he was unhappy with how the coach wanted things done?

I'll ask another: How do you expect to compete when you'll have three players- Nash, Amare, and Anthony, who are known to be below average defenders, on the court at the same time for long periods of time?

Heck- let me keep on going: How do you expect Nash to operate in a system where it will be conceivable that he will not have solid 3 pt shooters to spread the floor and give him the room he needs to operate and the targets he needs to be effective?


Honestly, this is one of the most idiotic things this team has thought about doing in a long time. It is purely reactive and makes no basketball sense.

This whole thing feels like a panicked response to the Nets getting Joe Johnson and maybe being a .500 team next year.

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

7/4/2012  8:22 PM
Paladin55 wrote:I'll ask the same question I've asked a number of times regarding Nash: How do you go all out to acquire a player who became a superstar in a system of play that your present star rejected to the point where he literally shut down his effort because he was unhappy with how the coach wanted things done?

I'll ask another: How do you expect to compete when you'll have three players- Nash, Amare, and Anthony, who are known to be below average defenders, on the court at the same time for long periods of time?

Heck- let me keep on going: How do you expect Nash to operate in a system where it will be conceivable that he will not have solid 3 pt shooters to spread the floor and give him the room he needs to operate and the targets he needs to be effective?


Honestly, this is one of the most idiotic things this team has thought about doing in a long time. It is purely reactive and makes no basketball sense.

Anthony (can) plays defense.

Melo did not reject any system that included Nash unless one is insane enough to believe that TD and even Super Jeremy was Nash-lite

Nash and Amare did not play D before and did pretty well

If the Knicks give up on Iman Shumpert I swear....

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy