Bonn1997 wrote:Mray20 wrote:JR is a very good defender about 100 times better than Landry Fields on D not to mention ball handling and shooting
You have not followed or even read about JR other than in half of this contract year. JR has better numbers per 36. Way better actually.
Everything per 36 min is worse for JR other than shot attempts (which then inflates his points). You can't look at the game just based on stats and sabermetrics though
Actually, the evidence is very clear that you can do just that and get a valid, accurate prediction of team wins. You should read about sabermetrics. My guess is you're expressing an opinion on its validity despite having read very little if any. Berri's books are a good introduction.
JRs per 36 are 18.6 PPg, 4.3 rebounds, 3 assist, 1.5 steals. Landrys rebounding is better. Other numbers are the same. So other than scoring their stats are similar.
I admittedly haven't studied up on saber metrics but do understand its value in predicting outcomes. But I think it's value (and correct me if im wrong) is most effective when looking at an entire teams roster rather than comparing 2 players to,each other. I think the eye test still has value also. Landry and JR have negative impact on games whether it's horrible/unreliable jump shooting, defense or shot selection.