CrushAlot wrote:I think the Knicks gave up way too much for Melo. However, trades for superstars usually work out for the team that gets the superstar. I struggle with a lot of the posts here that are anti-Melo because I am not a huge fan of Melo but he is the best player on the team and I think there is too much blame placed on him. I think if a franchise trades for a star they embrace him and play to his strengths. I think next year might be the year to judge the trade. Also, Tyson came to NY because of Melo and Amare. Stars do bring stars so I don't think that aspect of the trade and having Melo should be underrated. Melo might be the Clyde to Michael however, which puts the Knicks in a bad position with LBJ in the East.
agree on all points and Melo is an uber talented player, but his game isnt going to bring playoff wins. People knocked MDAs style that it couldnt win a title, but damn if it didnt go deep into the playoffs year after year? Melo's style of play is so easy to defend its a joke.
IF
1) Melo takes a Paul Pierce role and plays hard when the ball ISNT in his hands
2) Jeremy Lin can give us 75 games next year without wearing down
The Knicks will be a top 3 seed next year.
IF
1) Melo pouts and does his normal thing when he the offense isnt run through him
2) Lin isnt a reliable starter because his over aggressive style has him hurt
3) forced to rely on backup quality PGs we play Melo ball and watch him pound the rock nightly
The Knicks will have a couple nice streaks, win about 45 games, be the 6th seed and lose in the first round to the Heat, Pacers or whoever is around
Time will tell but thats what I see.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs