mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:Bonn losing your entire backcourt and the backup pg is a big deal. Shump is one of the best defenders so he was missed. Obciously missing both lin and baron would be impossible. also JJ has been playing on one leg. Chandler was sick teh first two games but i agree he was horrible the rest of the series

I don't disagree with any of that. We did have slightly below average luck - nothing like the Bulls or Magic but probably slightly worse than the Celtics and Hawks.
You do have to take into account the GOOD luck we had too though. Our big three have played about 30 years in the league and yet somehow were healthy for 14 out of 15 appearances.

So Tyson WAS healthy? I thought he was sick and that was your excuse for his abysmal play

Stat punched a piece of glass and he is out for the critical game 3, we go down 3-0 and you say "hey 14 out of 15 ain't bad" STOP!!

We lose our starting PG and our backup PG, we lose Shumpert (eh ... rookie whats the big deal)

I didn't say he was healthy; I said he appeared, which is better than a lot of teams can say for their top players. We did have slightly below average luck but we were NOT the victims of an unprecedented number of injuries. If you want to look forward, it would be reasonable to expect our back-court far fewer playoff games and our front-court to miss slightly more.

If our big 3 are worth what we play them (which is a few million more than Miami pays theirs), they should be able to get us past round 1 or at the very least compete with the less expensive Heat. Our big 3 - the most expensive big 3 in the conference and I think 2nd most expensive in league history - was negative seventy points for the series.

Oh you said "appeared" which according to the correct sample sizing chart ... uh ... wtf does that mean again?

Is appearing healthy - healthy or not healthy? What are we playing here dodgeball?

Well it depends what "is" is.

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:Bonn losing your entire backcourt and the backup pg is a big deal. Shump is one of the best defenders so he was missed. Obciously missing both lin and baron would be impossible. also JJ has been playing on one leg. Chandler was sick teh first two games but i agree he was horrible the rest of the series

I don't disagree with any of that. We did have slightly below average luck - nothing like the Bulls or Magic but probably slightly worse than the Celtics and Hawks.
You do have to take into account the GOOD luck we had too though. Our big three have played about 30 years in the league and yet somehow were healthy for 14 out of 15 appearances.

So Tyson WAS healthy? I thought he was sick and that was your excuse for his abysmal play

Stat punched a piece of glass and he is out for the critical game 3, we go down 3-0 and you say "hey 14 out of 15 ain't bad" STOP!!

We lose our starting PG and our backup PG, we lose Shumpert (eh ... rookie whats the big deal)

I didn't say he was healthy; I said he appeared, which is better than a lot of teams can say for their top players. We did have slightly below average luck but we were NOT the victims of an unprecedented number of injuries. If you want to look forward, it would be reasonable to expect our back-court far fewer playoff games and our front-court to miss slightly more.

If our big 3 are worth what we play them (which is a few million more than Miami pays theirs), they should be able to get us past round 1 or at the very least compete with the less expensive Heat. Our big 3 - the most expensive big 3 in the conference and I think 2nd most expensive in league history - was negative seventy points for the series.

Oh you said "appeared" which according to the correct sample sizing chart ... uh ... wtf does that mean again?

Is appearing healthy - healthy or not healthy? What are we playing here dodgeball?

Well it depends what "is" is.

You're right. "Appeared" is a VERY complicated word. It's right up there with Antidisestablishmentarianism and pneumanoultramicroscopic-silicovolcanoconiosis

as is "is"

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:Bonn losing your entire backcourt and the backup pg is a big deal. Shump is one of the best defenders so he was missed. Obciously missing both lin and baron would be impossible. also JJ has been playing on one leg. Chandler was sick teh first two games but i agree he was horrible the rest of the series

I don't disagree with any of that. We did have slightly below average luck - nothing like the Bulls or Magic but probably slightly worse than the Celtics and Hawks.
You do have to take into account the GOOD luck we had too though. Our big three have played about 30 years in the league and yet somehow were healthy for 14 out of 15 appearances.

So Tyson WAS healthy? I thought he was sick and that was your excuse for his abysmal play

Stat punched a piece of glass and he is out for the critical game 3, we go down 3-0 and you say "hey 14 out of 15 ain't bad" STOP!!

We lose our starting PG and our backup PG, we lose Shumpert (eh ... rookie whats the big deal)

I didn't say he was healthy; I said he appeared, which is better than a lot of teams can say for their top players. We did have slightly below average luck but we were NOT the victims of an unprecedented number of injuries. If you want to look forward, it would be reasonable to expect our back-court far fewer playoff games and our front-court to miss slightly more.

If our big 3 are worth what we play them (which is a few million more than Miami pays theirs), they should be able to get us past round 1 or at the very least compete with the less expensive Heat. Our big 3 - the most expensive big 3 in the conference and I think 2nd most expensive in league history - was negative seventy points for the series.

Oh you said "appeared" which according to the correct sample sizing chart ... uh ... wtf does that mean again?

Is appearing healthy - healthy or not healthy? What are we playing here dodgeball?

Well it depends what "is" is.

You're right. "Appeared" is a VERY complicated word. It's right up there with Antidisestablishmentarianism and pneumanoultramicroscopic-silicovolcanoconiosis

So impressed (with Wiki)

Lopado­­temacho­­selacho­­galeo­­kranio­­leipsano­­drim­­hypo­­trimmato­­silphio­­parao­­melito­­katakechy­­meno­­kichl­­epi­­kossypho­­phatto­­perister­­alektryon­­opte­­kephallio­­kigklo­­peleio­­lagoio­­siraio­­baphe­­tragano­­pterygon

Silverfuel wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:Bonn losing your entire backcourt and the backup pg is a big deal. Shump is one of the best defenders so he was missed. Obciously missing both lin and baron would be impossible. also JJ has been playing on one leg. Chandler was sick teh first two games but i agree he was horrible the rest of the series

I don't disagree with any of that. We did have slightly below average luck - nothing like the Bulls or Magic but probably slightly worse than the Celtics and Hawks.
You do have to take into account the GOOD luck we had too though. Our big three have played about 30 years in the league and yet somehow were healthy for 14 out of 15 appearances.

So Tyson WAS healthy? I thought he was sick and that was your excuse for his abysmal play

Stat punched a piece of glass and he is out for the critical game 3, we go down 3-0 and you say "hey 14 out of 15 ain't bad" STOP!!

We lose our starting PG and our backup PG, we lose Shumpert (eh ... rookie whats the big deal)

I didn't say he was healthy; I said he appeared, which is better than a lot of teams can say for their top players. We did have slightly below average luck but we were NOT the victims of an unprecedented number of injuries. If you want to look forward, it would be reasonable to expect our back-court far fewer playoff games and our front-court to miss slightly more.

If our big 3 are worth what we play them (which is a few million more than Miami pays theirs), they should be able to get us past round 1 or at the very least compete with the less expensive Heat. Our big 3 - the most expensive big 3 in the conference and I think 2nd most expensive in league history - was negative seventy points for the series.

Oh you said "appeared" which according to the correct sample sizing chart ... uh ... wtf does that mean again?

Is appearing healthy - healthy or not healthy? What are we playing here dodgeball?

Well it depends what "is" is.

You're right. "Appeared" is a VERY complicated word. It's right up there with Antidisestablishmentarianism and pneumanoultramicroscopic-silicovolcanoconiosis

So impressed (with Wiki)

Lopado­­temacho­­selacho­­galeo­­kranio­­leipsano­­drim­­hypo­­trimmato­­silphio­­parao­­melito­­katakechy­­meno­­kichl­­epi­­kossypho­­phatto­­perister­­alektryon­­opte­­kephallio­­kigklo­­peleio­­lagoio­­siraio­­baphe­­tragano­­pterygon

Why do you bother with him?

Silverfuel wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:Bonn losing your entire backcourt and the backup pg is a big deal. Shump is one of the best defenders so he was missed. Obciously missing both lin and baron would be impossible. also JJ has been playing on one leg. Chandler was sick teh first two games but i agree he was horrible the rest of the series

I don't disagree with any of that. We did have slightly below average luck - nothing like the Bulls or Magic but probably slightly worse than the Celtics and Hawks.
You do have to take into account the GOOD luck we had too though. Our big three have played about 30 years in the league and yet somehow were healthy for 14 out of 15 appearances.

So Tyson WAS healthy? I thought he was sick and that was your excuse for his abysmal play

Stat punched a piece of glass and he is out for the critical game 3, we go down 3-0 and you say "hey 14 out of 15 ain't bad" STOP!!

We lose our starting PG and our backup PG, we lose Shumpert (eh ... rookie whats the big deal)

I didn't say he was healthy; I said he appeared, which is better than a lot of teams can say for their top players. We did have slightly below average luck but we were NOT the victims of an unprecedented number of injuries. If you want to look forward, it would be reasonable to expect our back-court far fewer playoff games and our front-court to miss slightly more.

If our big 3 are worth what we play them (which is a few million more than Miami pays theirs), they should be able to get us past round 1 or at the very least compete with the less expensive Heat. Our big 3 - the most expensive big 3 in the conference and I think 2nd most expensive in league history - was negative seventy points for the series.

Oh you said "appeared" which according to the correct sample sizing chart ... uh ... wtf does that mean again?

Is appearing healthy - healthy or not healthy? What are we playing here dodgeball?

Well it depends what "is" is.

You're right. "Appeared" is a VERY complicated word. It's right up there with Antidisestablishmentarianism and pneumanoultramicroscopic-silicovolcanoconiosis

So impressed (with Wiki)

Lopado­­temacho­­selacho­­galeo­­kranio­­leipsano­­drim­­hypo­­trimmato­­silphio­­parao­­melito­­katakechy­­meno­­kichl­­epi­­kossypho­­phatto­­perister­­alektryon­­opte­­kephallio­­kigklo­­peleio­­lagoio­­siraio­­baphe­­tragano­­pterygon

Why do you bother with him?

I thrive on pointing out the fallacies in arguments of those who APPEAR to have a PHD.

mrKnickShot wrote:

Silverfuel wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:Bonn losing your entire backcourt and the backup pg is a big deal. Shump is one of the best defenders so he was missed. Obciously missing both lin and baron would be impossible. also JJ has been playing on one leg. Chandler was sick teh first two games but i agree he was horrible the rest of the series

I don't disagree with any of that. We did have slightly below average luck - nothing like the Bulls or Magic but probably slightly worse than the Celtics and Hawks.
You do have to take into account the GOOD luck we had too though. Our big three have played about 30 years in the league and yet somehow were healthy for 14 out of 15 appearances.

So Tyson WAS healthy? I thought he was sick and that was your excuse for his abysmal play

Stat punched a piece of glass and he is out for the critical game 3, we go down 3-0 and you say "hey 14 out of 15 ain't bad" STOP!!

We lose our starting PG and our backup PG, we lose Shumpert (eh ... rookie whats the big deal)

I didn't say he was healthy; I said he appeared, which is better than a lot of teams can say for their top players. We did have slightly below average luck but we were NOT the victims of an unprecedented number of injuries. If you want to look forward, it would be reasonable to expect our back-court far fewer playoff games and our front-court to miss slightly more.

If our big 3 are worth what we play them (which is a few million more than Miami pays theirs), they should be able to get us past round 1 or at the very least compete with the less expensive Heat. Our big 3 - the most expensive big 3 in the conference and I think 2nd most expensive in league history - was negative seventy points for the series.

Oh you said "appeared" which according to the correct sample sizing chart ... uh ... wtf does that mean again?

Is appearing healthy - healthy or not healthy? What are we playing here dodgeball?

Well it depends what "is" is.

You're right. "Appeared" is a VERY complicated word. It's right up there with Antidisestablishmentarianism and pneumanoultramicroscopic-silicovolcanoconiosis

So impressed (with Wiki)

Lopado­­temacho­­selacho­­galeo­­kranio­­leipsano­­drim­­hypo­­trimmato­­silphio­­parao­­melito­­katakechy­­meno­­kichl­­epi­­kossypho­­phatto­­perister­­alektryon­­opte­­kephallio­­kigklo­­peleio­­lagoio­­siraio­­baphe­­tragano­­pterygon

Why do you bother with him?

I thrive on pointing out the fallacies in arguments of those who APPEAR to have a PHD.

Silverfuel wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Silverfuel wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:Bonn losing your entire backcourt and the backup pg is a big deal. Shump is one of the best defenders so he was missed. Obciously missing both lin and baron would be impossible. also JJ has been playing on one leg. Chandler was sick teh first two games but i agree he was horrible the rest of the series

I don't disagree with any of that. We did have slightly below average luck - nothing like the Bulls or Magic but probably slightly worse than the Celtics and Hawks.
You do have to take into account the GOOD luck we had too though. Our big three have played about 30 years in the league and yet somehow were healthy for 14 out of 15 appearances.

So Tyson WAS healthy? I thought he was sick and that was your excuse for his abysmal play

Stat punched a piece of glass and he is out for the critical game 3, we go down 3-0 and you say "hey 14 out of 15 ain't bad" STOP!!

We lose our starting PG and our backup PG, we lose Shumpert (eh ... rookie whats the big deal)

I didn't say he was healthy; I said he appeared, which is better than a lot of teams can say for their top players. We did have slightly below average luck but we were NOT the victims of an unprecedented number of injuries. If you want to look forward, it would be reasonable to expect our back-court far fewer playoff games and our front-court to miss slightly more.

If our big 3 are worth what we play them (which is a few million more than Miami pays theirs), they should be able to get us past round 1 or at the very least compete with the less expensive Heat. Our big 3 - the most expensive big 3 in the conference and I think 2nd most expensive in league history - was negative seventy points for the series.

Oh you said "appeared" which according to the correct sample sizing chart ... uh ... wtf does that mean again?

Is appearing healthy - healthy or not healthy? What are we playing here dodgeball?

Well it depends what "is" is.

You're right. "Appeared" is a VERY complicated word. It's right up there with Antidisestablishmentarianism and pneumanoultramicroscopic-silicovolcanoconiosis

So impressed (with Wiki)

Lopado­­temacho­­selacho­­galeo­­kranio­­leipsano­­drim­­hypo­­trimmato­­silphio­­parao­­melito­­katakechy­­meno­­kichl­­epi­­kossypho­­phatto­­perister­­alektryon­­opte­­kephallio­­kigklo­­peleio­­lagoio­­siraio­­baphe­­tragano­­pterygon

Why do you bother with him?

I thrive on pointing out the fallacies in arguments of those who APPEAR to have a PHD.

I wont matter. He is a troll who never has anything to say other than to stir **** up.

That is true about 90 percent of the time while I am guilty of the same offense about 30 percent of the time

The only problem is that Bonn contradicts himself very easily due to carelessness and a below average short term memory thus getting himself in trouble all to often