martin wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:martin wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:martin wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:martin wrote:VDesai wrote:Other than game 1, Amare's been scoring at a really efficient clip from the field. He looks like he has quite a bit more explosion. What was the Melo backlash has now turned into Amare backlash. It's neither's fault that they can't play with each other. It's also both of their faults they can't play with each other. Its certainly not one and not the other. They need to lock themselves in a gym with a coach and figure this **** out.
I think part of the problem is not having a PG who can break his defender down. Over the past year the Knicks have had too much variation at he position.
Thats certainly fair but it did not really work with Lin and both of them either. PG for now is their glaring weakness. Chandler and Amare don't really work that great either.
How do you feel about the amnesty? Is there some validity here?
How many games has Lin Melo Amare played together?
Very few and not a big enough sample size - I know its still an unknown for the most part
Then why did you that it did not really work?
Because it did not in the games that they played.
You stated that part of the problem is that they do not have a PG that can break down the defense implying that if they did (LIN) it would/could be better. There is no way of knowing that either. In the games that they did play, though it was not many, it certainly did not look that way.
You are moving into the Bonnie space of useless points
My point is simple - I am sure many can and will disagree ...
Was signing chandler and not saving the Amnesty for Amare the correct move? As great as he has been I think that it might not have been worth it. If we did not sign Chandler and amnestied Amare this offseason then we would have a boat load of money / cap space. (IMHO of course)
Hind site is part of fan hood and I think it is a valid point.
Bonnie and I both liking thinking out of the box so I'm ok with that comparison 