I love this thread!

Seriously, like I said in some other post, Monday night was a perfect example of how we can win games by playing great defense and rebounding even if our offense sucks. And that was without JJ. That game is the poster game for what this team needs to do (not that it needs to suck on offense, but that it needs to win by doing the things that it can control).
Thank goodness Woodson realizes this (not that it takes a genius). He knows that we are not always going to hit shots or have our offense flow (no Lin and 9 turnovers by Davis the other night). We cannot always control that. But what we can control is our defensive intensity and our willingness to rebound the ball. If we rebound and defend, we will be fine.
I'm not going to get into my sheer frustration with MDA's unwillingness to get us to defend and rebound.
While it is too early for me to judge Woodson in terms of whether he should come back next year (though obviously he has done a great job so far), I do want to say this:
The difference between D'Antoni and Woodson is that MDA seemed interested only in having his offensive system work, even if it meant sacrificing or ignoring other important aspects of the game, and even if we were losing games in the process. Woodson, on the other hand, coaches to win, period. I could care less how "ugly" the offense is, and I mean that. The Ewing teams under Riley were not pretty offensively, but that team had the Garden rocking as much as any team ever. That's because they competed every single game, and won most nights. That is all I or, I hope, most NY fans care about.
This is basketball, not ballet.