MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:grillco wrote:MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:if they didn't pull that lockout stunt, would be playing normal schedule
Yeah, but the owners and commish don't have to play, just reap the benefits and rewards (as even the losing teams get a share of profits/luxury tax threshold overages). Of course we all know this, but still...
You talk as if they're sitting under a tree eating apples, watching the grass grow. Owners and comish do WORK, grillco, TOUGHER WORK THAN THE BALLERS! Beh-lee-dat.
They're not just sitting there REAPING REWARDS, come on.
No, players threw a fork in the machine because they don't understand how the league works. And then they were sloppy in their execution- I remember they did something at a late stage of the negotiations that they should have done a lot earlier if they were gonna do it! So it's right, I think, to make them play back to back to backs; the lockout was senseless. Go Stern and Owners.
grillco: The neverending enablement of the entitled. The players HAVE to PLAY. Read that sentence to yourself. Slowly. Like playing back to back basketball games is equal to what? Running a multimillion dollar organization? Like making sure thousands of people can make some sort of living? Like running THE professional basketball league for the entire planet?
Yes. Those poor players have to play. Don't forget they mostly have to tie their own shoes, too.
And you didn't even mention that they have to practice. The humanity.