Bonn1997 wrote:

ramtour420 wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

ramtour420 wrote:

RonRon wrote:how can I stop when I keep hearing things like...

"its a star league, and we need Melo to compete to be contenders" when it clearly set us back and we could have competed if we added the right pieces, and the bogus..

"Denver will never win a championship with their roster" while they have shown they are much improved since the trade, while they still have Wilson Chandler, cap room,
and plenty of draft picks.

"We are not done building, while we are one step closer after acquiring Melo" what the talent can we add with no picks, nothing much after MLE, with no bench, and
when Fields and Jorts can walk for nothing after their 2 year deals as 2nd rounders, or we can use the MLE to retain them but clearly missing much more pieces

"We were never gonna be contenders with our old core" while we still had Eddy Curry and players we could move to add to the core and signed FA last summer

"people blaming Amare or Tyson Chandler eating up our cap/ability to have add to the core" when we had chemistry, a system, and ball movement, and had MVP chants for Amare, prior to Melo coming... while Tyson Chandler has been the most solid player for us

"when Denver

"when people swear Amare can still net us Dwight Howard and saying we have leverage on Orlando, not the other way around" are they serious?

when people have to constantly explain how additions to our old core, with the improvement of our players, could have made us legit contenders this year and many years to come....

I think you mixed up the treads. Unless you are trying to hijack this tread, in which case I SMH

I don't think he mixed up threads. That was a great reply for this thread.

And you missed my point completely. Of course you would say its a great reply. However we already have 5 pages of these"great replies" in the other thread. To try to hijack this thread with the "great reply" that clearly belongs with the other 5 pages of similar content, is not cool.

So you're the thought police now. Great.

Oh please, Don't flatter yourself, I could care less. Just seems like there is a thread dedicated to exactly that type of rhetoric already and its a lot more popular.

mrKnickShot wrote:

arkrud wrote:The trade is already saved... so we cannot undo... need to restore from backup tape... and overwrite the current team...
...but if process will fail in between we can lose all data... and will need to do data entry again... not worth it... lets use as it is...

Infinite FOR LOOP

for (knicksTalent_vision = 0; knicksTalent_vision < allTeams_Talent_vision; knicksTalent_vision--){
performWeeklyShakeup();
continue;
}

performWeeklyShakeup() development outsourced to Isiah@Tomas consalting and will be tested remotely in China by Marbs@Vaselin.

while(Owner == Dolan)
{
   if (coach.year == 2)
   {
      tradePlayers(team, draftPicks);
      holdPressConference();
      makeNewCommercials();
   }
   else if (coach.year >= 3) 
   {
      fire(coach);
      coach = new Coach();
      if (coach == null)
      {
         coach = herb;
      }
      holdPressConference();
   }
   else 
   {
     fire(gm);
     gm = new GM();
     holdPressConference();
   }
}

mrKnickShot wrote:if (coach == null)
{
coach = herb;
}

thats hillarious

I hope at least:

if (tempCoach == null)
{
tempCoach = herb;
}

we can handle that by adding another if statement:

  else if (coach == herb and coach.year > 1) 
   {
      demote(coach);
      coach = new Coach();
      if (coach == null)
      {
         coach = herb;
      }
      holdPressConference();
    }

jrodmc wrote:Now the thread has been hijacked.

At least mindless lines of Pascal or Cobol or Fortran are better than reading how Gallo's bresses are tighter and firmer than Melo's, and that Moz has already been sized for his Chip ring...

+1, definately better, and I do think that there is probably an inside joke in the lines of code, somewhere. But hey, any kind of new discussion is welcome at this point, lol