[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Who is the better prospect...Gallo or Shump....


Author Poll
holfresh
Posts: 18679
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081


Wow...These are tow of the better rooks we have had over the last 5 years...Throw Will the Thrill in there for a little love...But who are we more excited about...Gallo I think still has a huge upside...This is a big year for him...It's said you know what a player is going to be in their 4th year...It's still early for Shump but it looks like he could be a solid all around player...A very poor man's Wade if you will...

D. Gallinari
I. Shumpert
W. Chandler
Too touchy a topic still
Too early to call
View Results


Author Thread
Erniecat
Posts: 20577
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2005
Member: #851
1/11/2012  1:28 AM
To me, it is not even close -- Shumpert.

Why? Because right away, we can clearly see that he will have an impact in the NBA -- mainly because he already has had an impact (we're 4-1 when he plays, 0-3 when he does not play). And not merely as a "complementary" player, like we saw in Fields for much of last season. Fields was thought of as a strong role player, while Shumpert is thought of as an impact player. Someone who will come into a game and make plays on offense and defense, and will just about always have an impact when he is on the floor.

With Gallo, it always seems to be about what he will be able to do in the future. And while he can impact a game from time to time, too often (at least with the Knicks; I don't watch him with the Nuggets too much) he has zero impact on a game.

So if I had a choice right now between the two players, it is not even close: I take Shumpert all the way.

And by the way, yes, you can form an opinion even though he's played just five games. Scouts and GMs do it all the time.

AUTOADVERT
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
1/11/2012  7:08 AM
I was a Gallo fan and still am but I think Shumpert is going to be the better player. This kid is a player. Gallo showed flashes from time to time but I can't wait to see where Shump's game is going to be in 4 years. Shump may be our best pick since Mark Jackson.
Blue & Orange 4 Life!
MarburyAnd1Crossover
Posts: 23120
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/24/2011
Member: #3650

1/11/2012  7:24 AM
knicks1248 wrote:Both are good quality players, depending on your need, i would take either, no preference..

If we stood the draft develope player course, our team would look something like

This is true, it is like an apple and orange.

I like Gallo's trey range, his length, his clutch balls, he can steal the rock, he can dunk the rock, he can shoot the rock, he will swat the rock; great baller.

Shump brings a confidence that is unusual in a rookie, he will go hard, he will steal the rock, he will lock down the gates. His brain is intense.

Carmelo Anthony is ANTI-BASKETBALL
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/11/2012  7:42 AM
Gallinari is no longer a prospect today. He also is doing pretty damn good for himself right now. 17pts 5rebs 3ast 2stls. He is also only shooting 25% from 3, if he was shooting his normal 33-34% from three he probably would be averaging 20pts a game.

On a side note the guys we "should have drafted over him". Anthony Randolph 7.8pts a game 2rebs and Jarred Bayless 8.3pts per game 1.7. I guess they got there community pick right, who would have thought.

Gallo was viewed as a better prospect which is why he was taken in the lottery and Shumpert wasn't but I think they close to even out. Shumpert may have a higher ceiling though because he isn't going to wait for teammates to give him the okay to make plays he will get after it himself.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/11/2012  7:50 AM
Why did we give Anthony Randolph away again?
once a knick always a knick
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/11/2012  7:59 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/11/2012  8:00 AM
FoeDiddy wrote:Gallo has shot 42.5% from the field in his career..37% from 3 in his career. This from a "Sharp Shooter"? 4.5 Rebounds from a 6'11 guy. 1.6 assist.

So you don't think Shump can equal this or even easily surpass any of those stats?


Carmelo is supposedly the best rebounding SF in the league. Gallinari is supposedly a bad rebounder. Yet, per 36 min, Carmelo gets only 1 more rebound than Gallinari. (I don't mean this as an attack on Carmelo, who I do think is a good rebounder.)
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/11/2012  8:17 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/11/2012  8:18 AM
The Donnie Walsh "I Had A..." (perfect hindsight) ... Dream Team

G Raymond Felton

G Iman Shumpert

F Danilo Gallinari

F David Lee

C Timofey Mozgov

6 Wilson Chandler

7 Landry Fields

8 Toney Douglas

9 Jared Jeffries

10 Anthony Randolph


Not bad.


But we know it could never happen.

once a knick always a knick
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
1/11/2012  8:19 AM
misterearl wrote:The Donnie Walsh "I Had A..." (perfect hindsight) Dream Team

G Raymond Felton

G Iman Shumpert

F Danilo Gallinari

F David Lee

C Timofey Mozgov

6 Wilson Chandler

7 Landry Fields

8 Toney Douglas

9 Jared Jeffries

10 Anthony Randolph


Not bad.


But we know it could never happen.

Not bad but no overly good either. Our team today is much better than that team would have ever been.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

1/11/2012  8:20 AM
misterearl wrote:Why did we give Anthony Randolph away again?

he didn't fit.... His play proved that. His body language on the knicks and Minnesota is night and day. Not our problem. D'antoni would have played him if he was playing well. He was not.


Gallo and Shump are two different animals. Gallo has to be punched in the mouth to wake him up. Shump is throws the first punch.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Nalod
Posts: 71160
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/11/2012  8:25 AM
shump is the flava of the month.

6 games? Rookie walls to hit or run thru.

I have not watched a minute of Denver this season.

We looking for Gallo to "star" or fit in a winning concept?

Same for Shump.

Shump is a better prospect cuz we have not traded him. Yet.

misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/11/2012  8:33 AM
CashMoney wrote:
misterearl wrote:The Donnie Walsh "I Had A..." (perfect hindsight) Dream Team

G Raymond Felton

G Iman Shumpert

F Danilo Gallinari

F David Lee

C Timofey Mozgov

6 Wilson Chandler

7 Landry Fields

8 Toney Douglas

9 Jared Jeffries

10 Anthony Randolph


Not bad.


But we know it could never happen.

Not bad but no overly good either. Our team today is much better than that team would have ever been.

Just for Kicks and Giggles:

G Raymond Felton

G Iman Shumpert

F Danilo Gallinari

F David Lee

C Tyson Chandler, who signs for a chance to play on Broadway, with a dynamic bunch of yoots

6 Wilson Chandler

7 Landry Fields

8 Toney Douglas

9 Shawne Williams

10 Anthony Randolph

11 Timofey Mozgov

12 Jared Jeffries

once a knick always a knick
Nalod
Posts: 71160
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/11/2012  8:37 AM
misterearl wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
misterearl wrote:The Donnie Walsh "I Had A..." (perfect hindsight) Dream Team

G Raymond Felton

G Iman Shumpert

F Danilo Gallinari

F David Lee

C Timofey Mozgov

6 Wilson Chandler

7 Landry Fields

8 Toney Douglas

9 Jared Jeffries

10 Anthony Randolph


Not bad.


But we know it could never happen.

Not bad but no overly good either. Our team today is much better than that team would have ever been.

Just for Kicks and Giggles:

G Raymond Felton

G Iman Shumpert

F Danilo Gallinari

F David Lee

C Tyson Chandler, who signs for a chance to play on Broadway, with a dynamic bunch of yoots

6 Wilson Chandler

7 Landry Fields

8 Toney Douglas

9 Shawne Williams

10 Anthony Randolph

11 Timofey Mozgov

12 Jared Jeffries

Thats a nice team. But lets be real, we don't pass on Deron, Cp3 or Dwight. Thats like asking Little Jimmy who got the munchies to not eat candy in a candy store. Dude would foam at the mouth.

A team that wins is not a team with stars. A good broadway play is one thing, the same play with a star does better at the gate. A bad play with stars still is an attractive draw. Knicks play on broadway.

misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/11/2012  9:05 AM
Nalod - the star is Tyson Chandler and this wet fantasy team averages 27 assists per night because they are unselfish.

... which is a LOT better than relying on two stars approaching their thirties on fragile wheels.

Did someone say depth?

Look at roster spots 6-12 and tell me, honestly, that second unit does NOT make you smile.

once a knick always a knick
Knixkik
Posts: 35449
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/11/2012  9:09 AM
misterearl wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
misterearl wrote:The Donnie Walsh "I Had A..." (perfect hindsight) Dream Team

G Raymond Felton

G Iman Shumpert

F Danilo Gallinari

F David Lee

C Timofey Mozgov

6 Wilson Chandler

7 Landry Fields

8 Toney Douglas

9 Jared Jeffries

10 Anthony Randolph


Not bad.


But we know it could never happen.

Not bad but no overly good either. Our team today is much better than that team would have ever been.

Just for Kicks and Giggles:

G Raymond Felton

G Iman Shumpert

F Danilo Gallinari

F David Lee

C Tyson Chandler, who signs for a chance to play on Broadway, with a dynamic bunch of yoots

6 Wilson Chandler

7 Landry Fields

8 Toney Douglas

9 Shawne Williams

10 Anthony Randolph

11 Timofey Mozgov

12 Jared Jeffries

Interesting to look at but not a very intriguing team. Looks like a weaker version of the current Nuggets. We probably would struggle to make the playoffs and certainly wouldn't get any further without a star or two on a team like that. Strong supporting cast though.

misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/11/2012  9:21 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/11/2012  9:21 AM
"Interesting to look at but not a very intriguing team."

You telling me that Ray Felton and Iman Shumpert would not be fun to watch?

Tyson Chandler and David Lee having each other's back?

once a knick always a knick
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

1/11/2012  9:25 AM
misterearl wrote:"Interesting to look at but not a very intriguing team."

You telling me that Ray Felton and Iman Shumpert would not be fun to watch?

Tyson Chandler and David Lee having each other's back?

I think it would be a fun team that would never win it all... I really think you need one go to guy in the NBA

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/11/2012  9:30 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/11/2012  9:31 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
misterearl wrote:"Interesting to look at but not a very intriguing team."

You telling me that Ray Felton and Iman Shumpert would not be fun to watch?

Tyson Chandler and David Lee having each other's back?

I think it would be a fun team that would never win it all... I really think you need one go to guy in the NBA

How do you know that in two years Iman Shumpert will not make people forget Dwyane Wade?

You need yoots.

once a knick always a knick
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/11/2012  9:33 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/11/2012  9:33 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
misterearl wrote:"Interesting to look at but not a very intriguing team."

You telling me that Ray Felton and Iman Shumpert would not be fun to watch?

Tyson Chandler and David Lee having each other's back?

I think it would be a fun team that would never win it all... I really think you need one go to guy in the NBA

We probably could have had the exact same lineup with Amare replacing D Lee. Basically the team pre-Melo but with Iman Shumpert and Tyson Chandler added in. That's a deep, well-balanced team with a go-to scorer.

Nalod
Posts: 71160
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/11/2012  10:36 AM
misterearl wrote:Nalod - the star is Tyson Chandler and this wet fantasy team averages 27 assists per night because they are unselfish.

... which is a LOT better than relying on two stars approaching their thirties on fragile wheels.

Did someone say depth?

Look at roster spots 6-12 and tell me, honestly, that second unit does NOT make you smile.

Earl, DOn't get me wrong, this is the team more or less that I wanted.

Does it win championships?

As we stand today, I don't think we are in that conversation either.

Tangables such as Baron stepping up is there, so you have hope, and hope is the "Stars in you eyes".

With a little imagination the premelodrama team could have been tweeked (like with Chandler) and maybe other tweeks as well.

Imagination vs the "sure thing".

And really, with that kind of talent you can also peel some players and actually get picks in return. You can BEGIN TO BUILD A CULTURE AND DEVELOP A LONG TERM TEAM.

LIke drafting Ginobli type players and let them incubate, or grab a Rubio and incubate him for a few years, etc etc.

A 20 year run can be made, not always championship runs every year, like any successful endevor you build a solid base.

Donnie was about cleaning out the old and building a culture. Took 2 years to do that. Got Amare to come. Took cap space and a coach he knows he can succeed with. Took a undervalued player in Rainman and turned him into a top 10 pt guard (for a while at least).

Then Jimmy got a boner and reverted back to a failued starphuch ideal. It can work from time to time but you can get caught with your pants down if your not careful shedding contracts before its too late.

Build a culture then build a base. We were doing that last year. That team was not going to be a champion but we all know things are not static.

Imagination and patience. Few NY fans have it. Thats why we don't have any new banners at the top of MSG.

This is about keeping seats full and paying for a renovation.

ITs a fun team to watch and Melo is very good all star player. No doubt you need go to guys to finish games. But you can grow them too!

Takes imagination and patience and in the case of the Spurs, Luck!

(SA lack of depth in the early stage of the era left it volnerable when Robinson went down and it became a Lotto team. They could have been impatient and without thought traded the pick prior as "who could imagine such a thing as the Admiral goig down and the team fail so miserable. But the genious of it all was they were not tempted into trading the pick to elevate. We don't take long term views on anything. So, they created their own luck by being prepared and anticipate what could go wrong. Luck is sometimes defined as "When preperation and opportunity collide". End result was Tim Duncan.)

Be nice to have both Gallo and Shump!

DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
1/11/2012  11:38 AM
its hard to call. I'd say Gallo has the better tools to become great but, as well all know, you have your Vince Carters of the World, uber-talented but lacking the drive, ego or killer instinct needed to reach that next level. I don't think Gallo has that type of drive to reach the next level. I do believe Shump has "it" and the presence of Melo and Stat have been no hindrance as it has with Landry
the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
Who is the better prospect...Gallo or Shump....

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy