[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks talking to Mike Redd
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
12/4/2011  10:12 PM
Maybe let Fields and shumpert ball out, trade for CP3 quick? Then Flip Amare for Dwight?
AUTOADVERT
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34070
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
12/5/2011  12:14 AM
I would favor Redd at one year for the minimum or a portion of the MLE. Beyond that is INSANE. At this point, his best case is the go-to guy on the second team and a spot up shooter with the team down by two or three, with less than 20 seconds to go, and the Kicks are inbounding
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/5/2011  12:21 AM
This guy is coming off of 2 major knee surguries, can someone say allan houston
ES
VDesai
Posts: 43113
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
12/5/2011  12:26 AM
I don't know if he's healthy, but if we were able to hit on this guy he could be a major difference maker. At this point he doesn't need to be a top scorer, but a sharpshooter like Redd could be deadly in this O.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/5/2011  12:27 AM
biggest need is at center. followed by backup PG and backup PF (to rest amar'e).

redd doesn't make sense, other than as an additional shooter. i mean, okay, he'd maybe fit, but there are SOOOO many other holes to fill.

¿ △ ?
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/5/2011  12:34 AM
were talking a short season with a lot of back to backs i rather Crawford
ES
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/5/2011  12:37 AM
knicks1248 wrote:were talking a short season with a lot of back to backs i rather Crawford

under no scenario are the knicks getting crawford for this upcoming season.

¿ △ ?
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
12/5/2011  7:49 AM
martin wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:if we get Redd assuming he is healthy for 1 year I'm all for it

pg-billups
sg-redd
sf-melo
pf-amare
c-foster

who play's D? You need Dwight Howard and Hakeem in him prime with that lineup.

i mentioned that earlier. Redd couldn't play defense before the injury but, off the bench in certain situations, I would love having a healthy Redd.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Knicks talking to Mike Redd
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy