[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Iman - What do you think of this pick


Author Poll
Markji
Posts: 2753
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
What do you think about the Knicks picking Iman Shumbert at #17.
Great pick.
Good pick.
I'll wait and see how he does before I decide
Should have chosen someone else.
Bad pick.
View Results


Author Thread
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

6/24/2011  10:39 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/24/2011  10:39 AM
I keep saying, I have watched a lot of GT basketball the past couple of seasons. The most concerning aspect of his game isn't seen by the numbers: he's a poor decision maker.

I would rather TD run the point (yikes!) and Shumpert develop as an offguard.

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
AUTOADVERT
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

6/24/2011  10:40 AM
Gymkata wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
nixluva wrote:
islesfan wrote:One dimensional defensive player who is below average across the board on offense. Can't run an offense, makes poor decisions with the ball and can't shoot. Yes he can help with perimeter defense but he doesn't have a position on offense. There were better players who filled bigger needs.

He gets to the line and shoots 80%! He avg'd 6 rebounds and with his great speed he can initiate the break and even finish above the rim or get fouled, where as I said he shoots 80%. Jumpers can be improved with a little hard work. It appears that has happened already. Can't say if he is bad at running an offense but i'm sure the Knicks got all the footage they need to see how he handled running a team.

Who are these better players and what "bigger need" could they fill, considering we needed help at guard?

I understand you like the pick, but as someone who watched a lot of his NCAA games, he makes poor decisions. He is not a natural point.

If you want to talk numbers, let's focus on his 27.8 percent three point shooting on 151 attempts, 5 attempts per game. I guess he finally shot over 40 percent form the field this season at 40.6 percent.

But most telling is his points per shot. 1.22, 1.11, and 1.23 his three years at GT. Everyone loves efficiency stats on this board, and I thought it was telling that he was even least efficient when he played with the best talent.

He certainly has physical gifts, and can defend, but he lacks polish and it certainly is not a forgone conclusion that this pick will work out or that it will pay immediate dividends. His physical gifts were more of an advantage in college than they will as a pro, and he was only considered as a first round pick after working out--not for what he accomplished on a basketball court

That's all valid. Again, this was one of the weakest drafts in years and we picked 17. If we can get a rotation guy out of this, then it's a win.

agree with the bold. He's much more of a development project than I think some are willing to admit

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
6/24/2011  10:42 AM
islesfan wrote:
fishmike wrote:Isles... I have yet to see a single thing from you saying who was on the board and clearly better.

This fills a short term and long term need as an elite perimeter defender. What we also know is he is an ELITE athlete even at the NBA level, he's a smart kid and he works very hard.

"One dimensional defensive player who is below average across the board on offense. Can't run an offense, makes poor decisions with the ball and can't shoot. Yes he can help with perimeter defense but he doesn't have a position on offense. There were better players who filled bigger needs."

What were Wilson Chandler's skills? 3-4 years later dudes a pretty damn good offensive player, turned into a good shot blocker, bla bla bla

If the Knicks are going to contend for a title they need this piece. Yes they still need a center and long term solution at PG but this is a good prospect.

Then you haven't been looking. I did last night. Before the Knicks picked, right after they picked and again after people asked who I liked instead.

Chandler has done very well for himself developing his offensive game. I'd take a chance on a raw SF who is very athletic and has an NBA body. But a guard who has zero ability on offense is a risk too great to take for a team in the Knicks position. Like I've said, I have no doubt he can help on defense but this isn't football, he has to play offense too and from what I've read and seen, he has zero skill offensively. Doesn't that worry you even the least? Like you said, the Knicks need a long term solution at PG and this guy isn't it. They also need shooters who can spread the floor for Amare and Melo and make teams pay for doubling them. This guy isn't that either.

That is a very valid point on your part Ises. I too agree that it is scary to have a guard that has trouble on the offensive side, you can get away with a forward but SG, G they have to be efficient with their shooting its a must. I can just see players leaving him and daring him to shoot while they play half way on Melo and Amare.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39877
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/24/2011  10:43 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/24/2011  10:56 AM
Pick was OK, I guess. I thought Donatas Motiejunas, Marshon Brooks and Jordan Hamilton were the most talented players who were available to us at 17, but those guys had other issues that made Knicks management uneasy, I guess. The Knicks made a commitment to defense and I respect that. Let's hope that Shumpert starts to understand the difference between a good and a forced shot.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
6/24/2011  10:47 AM
The kid reminds me of Sprewell when he came out but the Knicks move reminded me of a Balkman type move. You just don't know what you are gonna get with this pick, I like the defensive aspect but a G that has trouble shooting is a concern. Here is to hoping that he improves his shooting and offensive skills.
Gymkata
Posts: 20677
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/7/2010
Member: #3169

6/24/2011  10:47 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:I keep saying, I have watched a lot of GT basketball the past couple of seasons. The most concerning aspect of his game isn't seen by the numbers: he's a poor decision maker.

I would rather TD run the point (yikes!) and Shumpert develop as an offguard.

See, that's another reason why I'm not down on the pick. If the Knicks make a run at Paul or D-WIll like we all think, isn't Shumpert still valuable as a defensive weapon? I know that's speculation, but I'd rather deploy him as a Bowen-like defensive specialist on the beast guards of the East and leave the decision-making to a Billups or INSERT STUD PG HERE and the scoring to our two Alpha dogs. If he develops into something more, that's gravy. Regardless, we weren't picking the next John Stockton at 17.

"I can not say all the secrets."
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/24/2011  10:50 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/24/2011  10:50 AM
It would be my opinion that he won't be running the offense. Chauns will be.

So don't worry about giving him the keys.

It would be of my opinion that there might be some points made available for back up given the points that got drafted.

Sessions, DJ augustin, Collison, Harris........

None are chris paul, but lets save that one for another day.

We don't have too many assets to trade and any asset traded leaves a void. Walker does not have that much value. We need Shawn Williams.

Another draft filled with more hope by fans than common sense.

This draft will have some suprises and players picked after will do better. Lots of projects in this draft.

We took an NBA ready kid who can do some things now, and will need to get better.

Isles, Welcome back. Glad to see you have not changed. Maybe the knicks have not either?

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

6/24/2011  10:55 AM
Gymkata wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:I keep saying, I have watched a lot of GT basketball the past couple of seasons. The most concerning aspect of his game isn't seen by the numbers: he's a poor decision maker.

I would rather TD run the point (yikes!) and Shumpert develop as an offguard.

See, that's another reason why I'm not down on the pick. If the Knicks make a run at Paul or D-WIll like we all think, isn't Shumpert still valuable as a defensive weapon? I know that's speculation, but I'd rather deploy him as a Bowen-like defensive specialist on the beast guards of the East and leave the decision-making to a Billups or INSERT STUD PG HERE and the scoring to our two Alpha dogs. If he develops into something more, that's gravy. Regardless, we weren't picking the next John Stockton at 17.

On one hand, that's a more than valid point.

On the other hand, he has shown a penchant for REALLY forcing the issue despite his obvious shortcomings. In this offense, he'll be asked to take his shots. But I don't think he yet understands the difference between good and bad shots. Combine his poor selection and decision making with the work he needs to do with improving his shot in general, he may play his way into Pringels' doghouse early and then who knows what happens

All the articles that are coming out seem to indicate that he will be asked to man the point from time to time as well. I think that would be a huge mistake in Shumpert's development

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

6/24/2011  10:57 AM
anyway, lots of "ifs" with Shump, which esentially is the point I've been trying to make. It's neither sunshine and rainbows nor doom and gloom. A risk with equal upside and downside
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Gymkata
Posts: 20677
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/7/2010
Member: #3169

6/24/2011  11:01 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
Gymkata wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:I keep saying, I have watched a lot of GT basketball the past couple of seasons. The most concerning aspect of his game isn't seen by the numbers: he's a poor decision maker.

I would rather TD run the point (yikes!) and Shumpert develop as an offguard.

See, that's another reason why I'm not down on the pick. If the Knicks make a run at Paul or D-WIll like we all think, isn't Shumpert still valuable as a defensive weapon? I know that's speculation, but I'd rather deploy him as a Bowen-like defensive specialist on the beast guards of the East and leave the decision-making to a Billups or INSERT STUD PG HERE and the scoring to our two Alpha dogs. If he develops into something more, that's gravy. Regardless, we weren't picking the next John Stockton at 17.

On one hand, that's a more than valid point.

On the other hand, he has shown a penchant for REALLY forcing the issue despite his obvious shortcomings. In this offense, he'll be asked to take his shots. But I don't think he yet understands the difference between good and bad shots. Combine his poor selection and decision making with the work he needs to do with improving his shot in general, he may play his way into Pringels' doghouse early and then who knows what happens

All the articles that are coming out seem to indicate that he will be asked to man the point from time to time as well. I think that would be a huge mistake in Shumpert's development

I suppose the good news is he could be taught shot selection. With STAT and Melo out there, it would be hard for him to jack up garbage. The MDA Doghouse certainly looms, but I hope the wingman drought we have on this team would earn Shumpert some slack (as Walsh mentioned, there are minutes to be had for Shumpert; a rookie forward, not so much).

Let me ask you: from what you've seen from this kid, does he have the tools to be a top-line defender?

"I can not say all the secrets."
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
6/24/2011  11:05 AM
islesfan wrote:
fishmike wrote:Isles... I have yet to see a single thing from you saying who was on the board and clearly better.

This fills a short term and long term need as an elite perimeter defender. What we also know is he is an ELITE athlete even at the NBA level, he's a smart kid and he works very hard.

"One dimensional defensive player who is below average across the board on offense. Can't run an offense, makes poor decisions with the ball and can't shoot. Yes he can help with perimeter defense but he doesn't have a position on offense. There were better players who filled bigger needs."

What were Wilson Chandler's skills? 3-4 years later dudes a pretty damn good offensive player, turned into a good shot blocker, bla bla bla

If the Knicks are going to contend for a title they need this piece. Yes they still need a center and long term solution at PG but this is a good prospect.

Then you haven't been looking. I did last night. Before the Knicks picked, right after they picked and again after people asked who I liked instead.

Chandler has done very well for himself developing his offensive game. I'd take a chance on a raw SF who is very athletic and has an NBA body. But a guard who has zero ability on offense is a risk too great to take for a team in the Knicks position. Like I've said, I have no doubt he can help on defense but this isn't football, he has to play offense too and from what I've read and seen, he has zero skill offensively. Doesn't that worry you even the least? Like you said, the Knicks need a long term solution at PG and this guy isn't it. They also need shooters who can spread the floor for Amare and Melo and make teams pay for doubling them. This guy isn't that either.

Yes Islesfan....we weren't looking for your posts. Our bad. Could you be so kind as to tell us who was still on the board the Knicks should have picked isntead?

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
6/24/2011  11:10 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:anyway, lots of "ifs" with Shump, which esentially is the point I've been trying to make. It's neither sunshine and rainbows nor doom and gloom. A risk with equal upside and downside

That's potential for you. You just don't know what you are going to get.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
6/24/2011  11:17 AM
This could be Donnie's Ron Artest type pick. Artest sucks at shooting but eventually became a decent three point shooter. Artest still sucks at shooting though his first 4 years were horrible and his career is just that a crappy shooter that managed to improve his three point shooting.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/24/2011  11:56 AM
We have plenty of scoring on this team. Can he shoot any worse than JJ? I doubt.

If he's left open, MDA needs to tell him not to shoot and instead drive to the basket. He seems to have the ability to finish around the basket- at least that was from the videos posted. He may not be able to pass in traffic, but if he can finish on the break and brings defense, this pick is a win.

Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

6/24/2011  11:57 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:Pick was OK, I guess. I thought Donatas Motiejunas, Marshon Brooks and Jordan Hamilton were the most talented players who were available to us at 17, but those guys had other issues that made Knicks management uneasy, I guess. The Knicks made a commitment to defense and I respect that. Let's hope that Shumpert starts to understand the difference between a good and a forced shot.

I guess an "OK" is all that we can give this kid, at this point. Definitely preferred Montiejunas, as he represented that potential that you look for in a pick. I was really confused/disappointed by the lack of activity on the behalf of the FO in this draft. Maybe there's some "secret" plan to fill out the roster, but this definitely falls short. When all is said and done, we still have deficiencies at both guard positions.

A higher grade can be given to the 2nd pick, as he represents a find in the second round.

"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
Knicksfan
Posts: 33474
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
6/24/2011  1:04 PM
Right now it is a good pick. He fills a few needs while represents one of the best upsides in the first round, which is what you can ask for at 17. Will he make it be a great pick? Only time will tell but I trust this will be a productive pick for us long term.
Knicks_Fan
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

6/24/2011  1:43 PM
Saying the guy has zero offensive ability is somewhat ignorant.

He has much better shooting technique than Lee did when he came up, and I don't see why he can't improve upon it. I thought I saw him releasing his shot on the way down a few times, and leaning back once, looking a bit like Tyreke Evans, but there is nothing that can't be worked on, as far as I can tell.

I wanted a big, but I can accept this pick, especially if his D is as good as advertised. He will also help out as a rebounder, I would think.

Ultimately, though, you have to let the guy play in the NBA a few years before you can judge him as a player or as the 17th pick.

Walsh and the Knicks saw most of the players we might have taken instead of Shumpert, so you have to go with their decision.

If Singleton was 6'11" I would have been all for him, even with his offensive issues. We have enough guys around 6'8"-6'9" on this team, though, and Singleton or Faried would have little chance of playing significant minutes in our rotation or playing at the 5 position. Taking a guy like Hamilton would also have been a mistake- since he pretty much duplicates, to a lesser degree, what Anthony can do, and is not known as a defender.

It would have been nice to have had a few more picks, or the ability to move up if we really wanted another player, but the Anthony trade depleted our assets (players and picks), and that is why we could not be part of the trading frenzy that went on last night.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
6/24/2011  2:20 PM
Donatas Motiejunas has contract issues. He probably wont be able to come here this year, we don't have the luxury of playing the waiting game. Waiting 2 years and then letting him develop a couple of years later. I think he is similar to Andrea Bargnani, when he first came in the league, maybe slightly not as good.
I think players like that, need great legit centers, preferably Dwight Howard, Tim Duncan, Bynum, McGee, Hibbert, or Chris Kaman at the very least.
They are luxury players to have, and we just don't have it.

As for as Singleton and even Faried, they are players that are forwards, in which our 2 players combine for 2/3s of the salary cap. They won't work together because their defense would be killed every night. Why pick someone, knowing that they cant work together. In the end Singleton and Faried can't play center, neither can Amare.

Shumpert, was one my 2nd choice, I preferred Nikola Vucevic and would have giving up Fields to Pacers in order to get him. I wouldn't pick a forward because of the reasons above.
I think a lot of us wanted thim, because we felt he is a smart all round player that could work with Amare, Melo, and most importantly, Dantoni.

He can become a lockdown defender at the position that has been dominating the league the past couple of years, PG.
He has the speed, size, length, agility, speed, athleticism, and wants to become a defender.
I would really like to see a team like

TD
Shumpert
Ariza
Lamor Odom
Tyson Chandler

I think this team would be so sick defensively.

I think Shumpert's low can become Keyon Dooling and ceiling would be Russell Westbrook.
Marshon Brooks was the only other player I would think to take at pick 17. I think Jeremy Tyler fell all the way down the the middle 2nd round for a reason, and then traded to GS
for cash. Don't get me wrong, I would have loved to buy him off the Bobcats, but I don't think Bobcats and especially Jordan wanted to help any team in the east, especially the Knicks. I think we will need to acquire some more players but we are taking the right steps to getting there.

Lets give this kid some time, we have been complaining about our defense and now Walsh grabs a player that wants to defend and also has a high ceiling in Westbrook comparisons.
We need to let him develop, its not an easy job to do that, look at Ariza. We now have forces in Amare and Melo helping him develop. On top of it, he will have plenty to learn from
from Billups mentoring him. TD and Laundry Fields can both give him advice as a rookie as well. TD and Shumpert both make each other better too. They both play the passing lanes extremely well, are both long, and both aren't great decision makers. But TD now can focus on spotting up for a wide open shot because Shumpert has the ability to create for others.
He is extremely fast, with the size, and athleticism, and has a SICKKKKKKKK first step. On top of it, Melo and Amare have so much attention on them already.

I just wonder if he will be playing the PG, SG, or SF, because I think he will eventually have the ability to play all 3. If Billups mentors him and Shumpert grows with the ability to become a PG, with his size, we can have our big 3. I don't mind TD becoming a backup PG/combo, in the role of Jason Terry. TD needs to improve and he has the heart to and ethics to do so. He needs a more consistant mid range game, finishing, mastering the floater, and making better decisions.

Shumpert
XxXXX
Melo
Amare
XXXX

TD
Shawne Williams
Jerome Jordan
Josh Harrellson
Balkman

I am looking at 2012, I see this year as a true learning year with Melo, Shumpert and the rest of our team together. We will fill out our holes by next summer, in the mean time, we want to establish a foundation and system in which how we would be playing. I think we will still be playoff contenders but its unlikely that we become Championship contenders.

I think SG is the easiest position the fill in the league. Its unclear if Shumpert will become our future PG or starting SG. But I hope he can become a PG in which we would have a mismatch on our favor at that position for the first time in my eyes.
Get some D league talents, in the athletic, long and lanky, shot blocking, rebounding, and defense!

I think many teams will be looking for Dalembert services, I think he would choose Miami, if he chooses the best possibility of winning over $$$. Mainly for 2 reasons
1) His role is set, pretty sure he is a Starter. He gets to play d, block shots, rebound , get easy put backs while attention is all on Wade, Bron, and have Bosh to help out too.
2) no state tax, I am not sure if its for Orlando too, but He is not a lock to start there and if Dwight doesn't sign an extention, he could diminish Dalemberts hopes of winning rings

We need a combination of veteran and young legs to balance it out to become Championship Contenders. for this year, we might want to leave some longer contracts out and have the cap flexibility to make a play at FA next summer. But we still need to acquire some help, even if we have to sign longer contracts, I feel we must go for it, as long as it is cost efficient. Depending on how this CBA ends up, we will have a better idea what we have to work with for this summer and next...CBA could set the cap at 70 mill
If Turiaf opts out we can have a about 7m to spend.

We have to get a poorer version of Dalembert....

Sean Williams is at the top of my list.

Jeff Adriean, I have never seen him play, but some people here feel he can help. I think he seems a little small, he is the same size as Shumpert, I don't know if he can play center for us, or even PF.

Jeff Foster is a solid player. I think if he can play like the way he did back in the Artest/Stephan Jackson/Jo days, he will be a complete steal and a cheap veteran.

Prizbilla would be anti Dantoni but would be a great body to have.

I am not sure if we want to go with the tradional SG that can flat out shoot or a all round game.

Kapono
Anthony Parker
Shannon Brown
Grant Hill
Predrag Stojakovic
Delone West

All of the above most likely wont cost too much. Most a veteran min signings. Shannon Brown, Anthony Parker, and Prizbilla might cost a little more...

Wilson Chandler
J.R. Smith
Tyson Chandler
Kris Humpries
Tony Parker

these guys above will cost a lot more, and would hurt our flexibility for next summer.

Some other FA of the top of my head are

Dampier, Nazr, Ryan Hollins, Reggie Evans, Leon Powe, Josh McRoberts, Tj Ford, Dunleavey.
Brandon Wright *dont think NJ will give him the 4.5m qualifying offer*

In 2012, if cap set at $70m we can have about $25 mill so spend, if we don't add any contracts and keep all of ours. The FA list include.

Dwight Howard
Deron Williams
Cp3
Duncan
Kaman
KG
Ray Allen
Steve Nash
Mo Williams

I can see some of these veterans, coming to New York for a chance at a ring. That's why we must establish ourselves this year and it can cause a chain reaction.
We also don't want to be too ****y and make enemies this year. We would like some of these guys to join us and increase our chance at winning.
This is the year summer we can finish building our team and become Championship Contenders with added depth, veteran leadership, fill all our holes, and have luxury players!
I know I am dreaming but think about this squad...

Shumpert
Ray Allen
Melo
Amare
Dwight Howard

TD
KG
Shawne Williams
Jerome Jordan
Josh Harrellson
Balkman
Anthony Parker
Wilson Chandler

rubyz2
Posts: 20057
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/29/2008
Member: #2307

6/24/2011  2:48 PM
Interesting tidbit on the the Sun's interest in Shumpert:

San Diego State small forward Kawhi Leonard was a surprise drop to most, but it did not make the Suns flinch about taking Morris after serious consideration of Georgia Tech point guard Iman Shumpert. The Suns had a deal in the works to trade Robin Lopez for a pick in the 20s to get Shumpert, along with another piece, until New York took Shumpert at No. 17.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2011/06/23/20110623phoenix-suns-draft-markieff-morris.html#ixzz1QDjqk4ZJ

DJMUSIC
Posts: 22906
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/30/2007
Member: #1283

6/24/2011  3:14 PM
Good pick and in time most Knicks fans will love this guy

You can check out WFAN/Boomer-Carton Interview podcast, though later Iman had interview with Francessa a very good
interview by Mike and should check that out when available if you missed it.


Carton-Boomer/Iman Shupert Knick Interview:
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/?podcast_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.podtrac.com%2Fpts%2Fredirect.mp3%2Fnyc.podcast.play.it%2Fmedia%2Fd0%2Fd0%2Fd0%2FdY%2Fd1%2FdQ%2FdH%2FY1QH_3.MP3%3Fauthtok%3D5561491166116276438_19c4OXsQyWSnDghG0zW7UjQiI&podcast_name=Iman+Shumpert&podcast_artist=Boomer+Esiason+and+Craig+Carton&station_id=91&tag=&dcid=CBS.NY

regards
DJ

Turntable Musiclover & Mix-Master-ologist
Iman - What do you think of this pick

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy