SupremeCommander wrote:nixluva wrote:People are missing the point with a kid like Shumpert. What you want in a system like Mike has or the Mavs or Spurs are BASKETBALL PLAYERS. Not position guys. You want guys that have a very wide range of abilities, athletic, skill and BB IQ. Shumpert is a Shawn Marion type. A guy that has elite athletic ability. Can cover multiple positions. May not be a pure position guy, but can just play. Fields is also that kind of guy as is Shawne Williams. You want guys that can SLIDE. Chandler is another example of that kind of player. He can hold down SG, SF and PF. When you have a team full of guys like that it makes your team much more flexible and hard to deal with.You want better defense, then you have to have wings like this kid. Some gave thought to trying to bring in Igoudala and it would be for the same reasons. He can give you a lot of different things that fill in the holes. We've got stars. Now we need role players that can really do a lot of the little things.
Missing the point? We couldn't find room for Corey Brewer on our roster... now all of a sudden the program is going to find room for Shumpert?
Agree completely. Corey Brewer is an all world defender - an NCAA champion and phenomenal athlete. The knock is he can't shoot - but he shot better 3pt% in the NBA than Shumpert did in college.
The difference is that supposedly Shumpert can run the point. And he seems to crash the rim. I've looked at tape of him and I do like him and I think he'd fit alongside either Toney Douglas OR Chauncey Billups, which is a big deal and helps a lot with the rotation problems we have at the guard slots. I wouldn't hate taking him at all.
BUT, taking him makes me bitter we didn't give Corey Brewer even a CHANCE to play here. Also, if we had at least held onto him for this long, he'd be an asset to try to trade at the draft and move up, wouldn't he? I think waiving him was one of the worst decisions this club ever made. And it reeks of D'Antoni.