[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

C'mon People, Really....Really.....
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/21/2011  11:37 AM
fishmike wrote:who's upset? The trade looks great for Denver right now and lousy for the Knicks. This trade had a downside although the Melo jock riders refused to believe it existed. Funny how the guys that didnt like the trade preached patience in letting our good young players grow, that these things take time. Meanwhile guys like you ensured the rest of us that Gallo, Chandler, AR, etc would never be the caliber player Melo was, bla bla bla.

There are two problems. One Melo isnt as good as some of you thought. A lot of people around here locked him in as top 10 player or even a top 5 player and expected the type of impact when KG went to Boston. Melo is a not an MVP caliber player and is not an elite rebounder, defender or playmaker. I made a comparison and I will stick too it. Melo is a pre injury Arenas. He's a monster scorer who can drop 40 on you at anytime and take over games. He's got big holes though.

And dont poo poo the guys that left. Before the trade rumors were bothering them they were playing very well and getting better. There was no reason not to resign Chandler to a modest contract. He wanted to be here. We had a young, big skilled and deep roster and a star who get big buckets and carry the youths when needed:
PG Felton, Douglas
SG Fields, Walker
SF Gallo, Chandler
PF Amare, Williams
C Mosgov, Turiaf

Thats a deep team everyone but Amare/Felton 25 years old or younger. Thats a good start. We scrapped it to be a win now team built around 2 high scoring forwards who dont too much else and we have taken quite a step backward.

What cracks me up is guys like me who believed in our young players preached patience. The pro Melo at all costs guys are now saying the exact same things.. its going to take a year, maybe more to build up the roster around these guys. Its pretty funny.

I dont like the trade but I understand why the Knicks felt like they had to do it. I dont have to lovingly embrace Melo any more than I had to lovingly embrace Marbury (same caliber player). Everything about Melo says top NBA player. I think we are all waiting.

This could be the linchpin right back to the way things were before Walsh. Overpaid over hyped players that point fingers and lose a lot of games.

Team was in great shape--had cap space and building then we shot a cruise missile at it--one thing though can we please say that R turriaf scks for crying out loud---get that guy out of here please.

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53832
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/21/2011  11:46 AM
Finestrg wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
fishmike wrote:who's upset? The trade looks great for Denver right now and lousy for the Knicks. This trade had a downside although the Melo jock riders refused to believe it existed. Funny how the guys that didnt like the trade preached patience in letting our good young players grow, that these things take time. Meanwhile guys like you ensured the rest of us that Gallo, Chandler, AR, etc would never be the caliber player Melo was, bla bla bla.

There are two problems. One Melo isnt as good as some of you thought. A lot of people around here locked him in as top 10 player or even a top 5 player and expected the type of impact when KG went to Boston. Melo is a not an MVP caliber player and is not an elite rebounder, defender or playmaker. I made a comparison and I will stick too it. Melo is a pre injury Arenas. He's a monster scorer who can drop 40 on you at anytime and take over games. He's got big holes though.

And dont poo poo the guys that left. Before the trade rumors were bothering them they were playing very well and getting better. There was no reason not to resign Chandler to a modest contract. He wanted to be here. We had a young, big skilled and deep roster and a star who get big buckets and carry the youths when needed:
PG Felton, Douglas
SG Fields, Walker
SF Gallo, Chandler
PF Amare, Williams
C Mosgov, Turiaf

Thats a deep team everyone but Amare/Felton 25 years old or younger. Thats a good start. We scrapped it to be a win now team built around 2 high scoring forwards who dont too much else and we have taken quite a step backward.

What cracks me up is guys like me who believed in our young players preached patience. The pro Melo at all costs guys are now saying the exact same things.. its going to take a year, maybe more to build up the roster around these guys. Its pretty funny.

I dont like the trade but I understand why the Knicks felt like they had to do it. I dont have to lovingly embrace Melo any more than I had to lovingly embrace Marbury (same caliber player). Everything about Melo says top NBA player. I think we are all waiting.

This could be the linchpin right back to the way things were before Walsh. Overpaid over hyped players that point fingers and lose a lot of games.

Yeah Denver got the best of the trade after 15 games? Gallo was on the shelf for most of them and Felton is on the shelf right now. It's easier to insert one player into your starting lineup than it is to add 4. Denver isn't winning a championship with that roster anyway.

Melo is the best rebounding SF in the NBA and the 3rd best SF in the NBA. It's not like I didn't like the players that we had it's that a player like Melo, in the prime of his career, does not become available very often. Bottom line is Melo is the better player and you add the better players as opposed to seeing if potential is fulfilled. Billups is an upgrade and Melo is an upgrade. The former roster nor this roster are winning it all this year but we have a better chance with Melo than without him.

What player doesn't have holes? The only players in the NBA that are damn close to perfect are Kobe, Lebron and Durant. Who’s to say that Chandler would have resigned for a modest contract? Players want to become paid and Chandler is no different. Let's see what he signs for this summer and see where he would have fit in with the Knicks at that number. Let's see what type of money Gallo gets.

Comparing a pre-injury Arenas to Melo is dumb. Let's see a 6'8 SF who is the best rebounder at his position and top 3 at his positon who can knock down a shot with a game on the line who commands a double team to a guy who's an in between PG/SG? Please, other than scoring compare away.

Billups is an upgrade over the stop gap that was Felton. Mosgov was a project who wasn't going to have a major impact anytime soon. We give up Gallo and Chandler for Melo. The Knicks would have had to pay them both and it wasn't going to be for modest dollars anymore than what it would have cost modest dollars to resign Felton if the Knicks wanted him back.

PG Billups, Douglas
SG Fields, Mason, Jr.
SF Anthony, Walker
PF Amare, Williams
C Turiaf, Williams

How is former roster any deeper than the current roster?

Well said Cash.

he didnt say anything!

Here's what he said:

Melo isnt an MVP caliber player (so why did we pay an MVP caliber package???)
Melo is a star and none of the Knicks were, are or will ever be.

You would have thought after the Isiah regime that simply getting the best player in the trade doesnt make it a good trade.

Have I ever said Melo isnt good? The point I made against the trade was we didnt need a high volume scorer who did little else.

Saying Melo is among tops at rebounding at his position means crap. Who cares? Watch the games dude and quit browsing stats. Collecting some rebounds and being a presence on the boards are two different things. Melo doesnt control the glass. Marion was getting 10+ boards a night under MDA. He was an impact rebounder.

KG is an MVP caliber player, because he's one of the best defensive players in the league. Melo cant stop Gallo some dropping 30 on him (and we ALL know Gallo is all hype). So paying an MVP package for a player that isnt an MVP caliber is a bad trade and bad business and will set the Knicks back.

THATS what I'm saying. Thats what the people who didnt like the trade are saying. Everyone else seems to be in denial. Why look at whats actually happening on the court when we can cling to monikers such as stars win games and role players are replaceable.

To all the Melo lovers:
I'm sorry he's not the player you thought or think he is. If Walsh stays there is still hope. Lets hope in addition to forcing his way here, getting Knicks to pay him more than anyone in the NBA and costing us all the resources we had in the meantime to trade for him we are still able to fill the massive holes to cover up all the holes in his game.

The best is when Walsh stockpiles the team again and we have high caliber guys like Nene, Camby and Dre Miller all in the their prime you can give Melo all the credit for making it work. Lets hope Melo gets us out of round one ;)

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53832
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/21/2011  11:51 AM
cashmoney... your lineup of Melo/Amare/Fields/Turiaf/Billups is lousy
Turiaf is BAD. We now see why. He blocks some shots and can infuse some energy into the game for a 5-8 minutes stretch before you see the holes in his game. Billups might have some gas in the tank, he might even be an upgrade over Felton THIS YEAR. After that is not close, because Felton was playing well and was young and had a great motor and was 10x the defensive player Billups is at this point.

Look at the Marbury trade, Curry trade, Crawford trade, Zach trade, Melo trade... Knicks ALLWAYS got the best player. At some point fans might learn thats not the best way to build a TEAM. Or you can just blame the coach.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

3/21/2011  11:55 AM
Felton singlehandedly won games for us at times. There aren't 10 PG's better than him in the league.
Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

3/21/2011  12:05 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
fishmike wrote:Funny how the guys that didnt like the trade preached patience in letting our good young players grow, that these things take time. Meanwhile guys like you ensured the rest of us that Gallo, Chandler, AR, etc would never be the caliber player Melo was, bla bla bla.

If y'al are so patient, why pass judgement on what represents 18.29 percent of a season? And do so even before the percentage looks so large? I still maintain Gallo, Chandler, AR, etc. will never be as as good as Melo, and Donnie was hired on April 2, 2008. Every player the Knicks gave up, with the exception of Chandler, was acquired within a year or two. There is little reason to think that the supporting cast won't be replenished within a reasonable time.

There are two problems. One Melo isnt as good as some of you thought. A lot of people around here locked him in as top 10 player or even a top 5 player and expected the type of impact when KG went to Boston. Melo is a not an MVP caliber player and is not an elite rebounder, defender or playmaker.

I would compare Melo to Paul Pierce. That said, for that acquisition to have a similar effect as KG, we'd have to get a Ray Allen. Considering Walsh has all along said that the "2010 plan" isn't the 2010 plan, but the 2011, and 2012 plan, the logic tends to be that this wasn't the final acquisition.

While Bill Simmons is not the holy grail of basketball writers, he does have a best selling basketball encyclopedia. This was from his initial reaction of the trade:

One of the strangest subplots this week: Everyone rushing to pick Carmelo's game apart, especially people who rely on advanced metrics and ended up getting caught up in small-picture stuff. Carmelo has one elite skill (he rebounds extremely well for a small forward) and one transcendent skill (he's as good as anyone in the league at scoring and/or getting to the line, especially in crunch time). You can absolutely, positively, unquestionably win a championship if Carmelo Anthony is your creator at the end of a basketball game. The Knicks didn't have anyone like that. Few teams do.

Now throw this in: He's only 26.

Now throw this in: Ten guys started the 2011 All-Star Game. In a 30-team league, the Knicks suddenly have two of them.

Now throw this in: The other players know. They know who's good. They know who's worth a damn. They know who they'd go to war with. So you can't discount (A) how well Carmelo played on the 2008 Olympic team; (B) how much the other guys respected him; and (C) how the key guys on that team were Kobe, LeBron, Wade and Carmelo. It can't be forgotten. It just can't. Neither can the fact that he nearly carried a limited Nuggets team to the Finals two years ago.

Now throw this in: If there was ever a player who could be ignited by a great basketball city and a consistently fantastic crowd, it's Carmelo Anthony. He's been stuck in a relatively icy cruise control for two solid years, playing in a city he didn't totally love, being professional about it, trying hard every game ... and yet, there was something detached about him. No longer. I hate how he weaseled his way to the Knicks and pissed on Denver fans, but that's over. Let's look at this thing objectively: He's going to kill it with the Knicks. I'd bet anything. They haven't had someone like this since Bernard King, which is funny because I always thought Melo was Bernard 2.0. Playing in New York isn't for everyone, but in this case, it will be the best thing that ever happened to Carmelo Anthony.

I keep hearing that you can't win a title with Melo and Amare. Agreed. But you can win the title with Carmelo, Amare and Chris Paul (or Dwight Howard, or Deron Williams). In the short term, you can make some noise, rock the building and make Knicks fans forget about the 10 excruciating years they just endured. And you can scare the living hell out of the fans from the other Eastern contenders. Believe me, as a Celtics fan, I want no part of the Knicks this spring for one reason: You never want to play a playoff series in which the other team has the best guy. There's a decent chance Carmelo could just go off 1984 Bernard-style in Round 1 or Round 2. I'm crapping my pants just thinking about it. Over everything else, THAT is why they had to make this trade. A week ago, the Knicks were a .500 team. Now, they matter. And if you're throwing stats at me, I'll counter with this one: 15 for 15. Thank you and please drive through.

I made a comparison and I will stick too it. Melo is a pre injury Arenas. He's a monster scorer who can drop 40 on you at anytime and take over games. He's got big holes though.

Sure, he's got holes. But he was a key cog in an NCAA championship team and for the gold medal US Olympic Redeem team. Not buying it at all.

And dont poo poo the guys that left. Before the trade rumors were bothering them they were playing very well and getting better. There was no reason not to resign Chandler to a modest contract. He wanted to be here. We had a young, big skilled and deep roster and a star who get big buckets and carry the youths when needed:
PG Felton, Douglas
SG Fields, Walker
SF Gallo, Chandler
PF Amare, Williams
C Mosgov, Turiaf

Thats a deep team everyone but Amare/Felton 25 years old or younger. Thats a good start. We scrapped it to be a win now team built around 2 high scoring forwards who dont too much else and we have taken quite a step backward.

No one is poo-pooing those guys. I just believe those players will be easier to replace than Melo. Also, there has been more minutes available for Douglas and Shawne Williams, both of whom have looked great. (Not to mention the Knicks held onto Fields, who I think is the best player of the bunch.)

What cracks me up is guys like me who believed in our young players preached patience. The pro Melo at all costs guys are now saying the exact same things.. its going to take a year, maybe more to build up the roster around these guys. Its pretty funny.

I don't think anyone discounted "patience." I know I certainly wasn't. The argument then is the same that it is now: the future is brightest with a Melo and Amar'e foundation. This team has sucked for so long. One of five teams that hasn't won 50 games in the last 11 years. We wouldn't have won 50 this season with either roster.

This could be the linchpin right back to the way things were before Walsh. Overpaid over hyped players that point fingers and lose a lot of games.

Except the payroll is in order, and significant upgrades look on the horizon. If Paul/DWill/Howard is added to the mix, this team is positioned to war with Miami for the next five years while Boston continues to age.

Excellent reply. Agreed that the future of this team is much brighter than the previous. Not that its easy, but we'll have a better shot at replacing that parts that went out (Gallo, Chandler, Felt, etc) than securing a star playwer like Melo. If we whiffed on Melo, there is a strong possibility we would have never gotten a player of his calibre considering the new collective bargining agreement.

fishmike
Posts: 53832
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/21/2011  12:16 PM
I'm sorry I'm not buying it. Chandler (22), Gallo (22), Felton (26), Mosgov (25), AR (21) + a pick are all gone for one guy in the long term plans but your selling me on a brighter future?

Also our cap is NOT in order. It would have been if we signed Melo as a FA like w/ Amare where his deal starts at $16mm(ish) a year. Instead we gave him an extention paying over $20mm a year. That kills big FA options. There's a little discussed caveat.

I'm desperate to be proven wrong. I'm calling it like I see it. Not pissing and moaning in the wind here. Melo didnt singlehandedly revive Denver. Camby, Nene and Andre Miller had a lot to do with that.

I've posted threads about how and with who are we going to build around. I'm over the trade. It was a bad trade and I accept that. Its up to Walsh or Isiah or whoever to replace the lost pieces and build something here. This year looks like a wash.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/21/2011  12:21 PM
Knick Fans have to keep their eyes on the prize. This is still part of step one. The whole process was upset by the involvement of Dolan and the insistence from Melo and his people that he didn't want to wait for FA. So here we are having gotten the player we wanted at a higher price than we wanted. However, the plan is only altered slightly. We know that we needed GOOD size before the trade and we still do. Now we proceed with the rest of the process this summer. We want to hopefully find title contending size to have a real impact on how this team plays.

As for this season, it's still up in the air and to be decided how this season ends. The process of finding a balance and developing chemistry is not as easy as some expected. I'm still hopeful that this group can get it together by the playoffs. Let's be honest tho, it was never about just this season. It's about the next 5 seasons and you have to start with a core you believe you can build to an elite level. I still feel it was worth the cost, cuz I think this core gives us a chance to build a title contender.

CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
3/21/2011  12:32 PM
fishmike wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
fishmike wrote:who's upset? The trade looks great for Denver right now and lousy for the Knicks. This trade had a downside although the Melo jock riders refused to believe it existed. Funny how the guys that didnt like the trade preached patience in letting our good young players grow, that these things take time. Meanwhile guys like you ensured the rest of us that Gallo, Chandler, AR, etc would never be the caliber player Melo was, bla bla bla.

There are two problems. One Melo isnt as good as some of you thought. A lot of people around here locked him in as top 10 player or even a top 5 player and expected the type of impact when KG went to Boston. Melo is a not an MVP caliber player and is not an elite rebounder, defender or playmaker. I made a comparison and I will stick too it. Melo is a pre injury Arenas. He's a monster scorer who can drop 40 on you at anytime and take over games. He's got big holes though.

And dont poo poo the guys that left. Before the trade rumors were bothering them they were playing very well and getting better. There was no reason not to resign Chandler to a modest contract. He wanted to be here. We had a young, big skilled and deep roster and a star who get big buckets and carry the youths when needed:
PG Felton, Douglas
SG Fields, Walker
SF Gallo, Chandler
PF Amare, Williams
C Mosgov, Turiaf

Thats a deep team everyone but Amare/Felton 25 years old or younger. Thats a good start. We scrapped it to be a win now team built around 2 high scoring forwards who dont too much else and we have taken quite a step backward.

What cracks me up is guys like me who believed in our young players preached patience. The pro Melo at all costs guys are now saying the exact same things.. its going to take a year, maybe more to build up the roster around these guys. Its pretty funny.

I dont like the trade but I understand why the Knicks felt like they had to do it. I dont have to lovingly embrace Melo any more than I had to lovingly embrace Marbury (same caliber player). Everything about Melo says top NBA player. I think we are all waiting.

This could be the linchpin right back to the way things were before Walsh. Overpaid over hyped players that point fingers and lose a lot of games.

Yeah Denver got the best of the trade after 15 games? Gallo was on the shelf for most of them and Felton is on the shelf right now. It's easier to insert one player into your starting lineup than it is to add 4. Denver isn't winning a championship with that roster anyway.

Melo is the best rebounding SF in the NBA and the 3rd best SF in the NBA. It's not like I didn't like the players that we had it's that a player like Melo, in the prime of his career, does not become available very often. Bottom line is Melo is the better player and you add the better players as opposed to seeing if potential is fulfilled. Billups is an upgrade and Melo is an upgrade. The former roster nor this roster are winning it all this year but we have a better chance with Melo than without him.

What player doesn't have holes? The only players in the NBA that are damn close to perfect are Kobe, Lebron and Durant. Who’s to say that Chandler would have resigned for a modest contract? Players want to become paid and Chandler is no different. Let's see what he signs for this summer and see where he would have fit in with the Knicks at that number. Let's see what type of money Gallo gets.

Comparing a pre-injury Arenas to Melo is dumb. Let's see a 6'8 SF who is the best rebounder at his position and top 3 at his positon who can knock down a shot with a game on the line who commands a double team to a guy who's an in between PG/SG? Please, other than scoring compare away.

Billups is an upgrade over the stop gap that was Felton. Mosgov was a project who wasn't going to have a major impact anytime soon. We give up Gallo and Chandler for Melo. The Knicks would have had to pay them both and it wasn't going to be for modest dollars anymore than what it would have cost modest dollars to resign Felton if the Knicks wanted him back.

PG Billups, Douglas
SG Fields, Mason, Jr.
SF Anthony, Walker
PF Amare, Williams
C Turiaf, Williams

How is former roster any deeper than the current roster?

Well said Cash.

he didnt say anything!

Here's what he said:

Melo isnt an MVP caliber player (so why did we pay an MVP caliber package???)
Melo is a star and none of the Knicks were, are or will ever be.

You would have thought after the Isiah regime that simply getting the best player in the trade doesnt make it a good trade.

Have I ever said Melo isnt good? The point I made against the trade was we didnt need a high volume scorer who did little else.

Saying Melo is among tops at rebounding at his position means crap. Who cares? Watch the games dude and quit browsing stats. Collecting some rebounds and being a presence on the boards are two different things. Melo doesnt control the glass. Marion was getting 10+ boards a night under MDA. He was an impact rebounder.

KG is an MVP caliber player, because he's one of the best defensive players in the league. Melo cant stop Gallo some dropping 30 on him (and we ALL know Gallo is all hype). So paying an MVP package for a player that isnt an MVP caliber is a bad trade and bad business and will set the Knicks back.

THATS what I'm saying. Thats what the people who didnt like the trade are saying. Everyone else seems to be in denial. Why look at whats actually happening on the court when we can cling to monikers such as stars win games and role players are replaceable.

To all the Melo lovers:
I'm sorry he's not the player you thought or think he is. If Walsh stays there is still hope. Lets hope in addition to forcing his way here, getting Knicks to pay him more than anyone in the NBA and costing us all the resources we had in the meantime to trade for him we are still able to fill the massive holes to cover up all the holes in his game.

The best is when Walsh stockpiles the team again and we have high caliber guys like Nene, Camby and Dre Miller all in the their prime you can give Melo all the credit for making it work. Lets hope Melo gets us out of round one ;)

When did I say Melo isn't a MVP caliber player. Oh, because I said Kobe, Durant and Lebron are better players? I watch every game and the Knicks haved played good defense in spurts. If you watched the game yesterday it was lost because of offense not defense. KG is a MVP caliber player who didn't win crap until he teamed with other stars! KG didn't get out of the 1st round of the playoffs with the Wolves until they picked up Latrell and Cassel. Yeah Gallo had a good game against Melo so what's the point? Marion was a product of the SSOL system.

What part of basketball is a team game is not understood. No one, including myself, ever said that adding Melo equaled instant championship. Those who were against the trade look at the Nuggets being 9-4 since the trade while not looking at what our former guys are actually contributing to the team. The Knicks gave Melo the same money he was going to get in Denver and would have gotten from the Nets. Role players are replacebale but won't be replaced with 14 games left in the season. Let's see what happens after a full year with Melo, STAT and pieces.


Blue & Orange 4 Life!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/21/2011  12:35 PM
fishmike wrote:I'm sorry I'm not buying it. Chandler (22), Gallo (22), Felton (26), Mosgov (25), AR (21) + a pick are all gone for one guy in the long term plans but your selling me on a brighter future?

Also our cap is NOT in order. It would have been if we signed Melo as a FA like w/ Amare where his deal starts at $16mm(ish) a year. Instead we gave him an extention paying over $20mm a year. That kills big FA options. There's a little discussed caveat.

I'm desperate to be proven wrong. I'm calling it like I see it. Not pissing and moaning in the wind here. Melo didnt singlehandedly revive Denver. Camby, Nene and Andre Miller had a lot to do with that.

I've posted threads about how and with who are we going to build around. I'm over the trade. It was a bad trade and I accept that. Its up to Walsh or Isiah or whoever to replace the lost pieces and build something here. This year looks like a wash.

fishmike--theyre are intangibles that go beyond personnel. Our star really does not play MDA ball. Hes not really ball mover but a stopper.We had a team and a style --I mean we went 13-1--that showed the potential of the team+ we started picking it up right before trade. Still cannot believe we did it what a nightmare of epic proportions. Some of you guys probably are not old enough to know who spencer haywood and Bob macadoo are. well this is similar heck we still has pearl and frazier that first year--and we had a big young Lonnie Shelton decent role players and still scked. you cant just throw players together half arsed like that has to fit in a style of play. Carmelo has $ in the bank---hes got his--I dont trust him hes Marbury 2.

RIP Crushalot😞
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
3/21/2011  12:54 PM
fishmike wrote:I'm sorry I'm not buying it. Chandler (22), Gallo (22), Felton (26), Mosgov (25), AR (21) + a pick are all gone for one guy in the long term plans but your selling me on a brighter future?

Also our cap is NOT in order. It would have been if we signed Melo as a FA like w/ Amare where his deal starts at $16mm(ish) a year. Instead we gave him an extention paying over $20mm a year. That kills big FA options. There's a little discussed caveat.

I'm desperate to be proven wrong. I'm calling it like I see it. Not pissing and moaning in the wind here. Melo didnt singlehandedly revive Denver. Camby, Nene and Andre Miller had a lot to do with that.

I've posted threads about how and with who are we going to build around. I'm over the trade. It was a bad trade and I accept that. Its up to Walsh or Isiah or whoever to replace the lost pieces and build something here. This year looks like a wash.

Chadler = RFA - What's he going to command?
Gallo = RFA Next Year - What's he going to command?
Felton = Signed for 2 years. Contaract up at the same time Gallo becomes a RFA. What's his cost? Definately not what he signed for last summer.
Mosgov = He may be a solid NBA player in the next 3-5 years which puts him at 28-30 years old.
AR = ???? Let's see what he turns into if anything.

What part of Melo no going into FA is not understood? Also, even with the extension you're talking about a difference of around $2 million. That's not going to make the Knicks miss out on anyone this summer becuase there is no one to miss out on. The next wave of FA's is not until the 2012-2013 seaon. With that being said the difffernce in Melo's salary at that time is closer to a difference of about $1.5 million.

Those against the trade fail to that Gallo and Chandler in reality are soon to be veteran players who are going to command dollars. It doesn't matter how old they are it matters how long they've been in the league.

Melo didn't singlehandedly revive Denver but he played the major role. One player makes a difference but players make a team. Let's see Carmelo and Amar'e get players around them and let's see what happens.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/21/2011  12:55 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:I'm sorry I'm not buying it. Chandler (22), Gallo (22), Felton (26), Mosgov (25), AR (21) + a pick are all gone for one guy in the long term plans but your selling me on a brighter future?

Also our cap is NOT in order. It would have been if we signed Melo as a FA like w/ Amare where his deal starts at $16mm(ish) a year. Instead we gave him an extention paying over $20mm a year. That kills big FA options. There's a little discussed caveat.

I'm desperate to be proven wrong. I'm calling it like I see it. Not pissing and moaning in the wind here. Melo didnt singlehandedly revive Denver. Camby, Nene and Andre Miller had a lot to do with that.

I've posted threads about how and with who are we going to build around. I'm over the trade. It was a bad trade and I accept that. Its up to Walsh or Isiah or whoever to replace the lost pieces and build something here. This year looks like a wash.

fishmike--theyre are intangibles that go beyond personnel. Our star really does not play MDA ball. Hes not really ball mover but a stopper.We had a team and a style --I mean we went 13-1--that showed the potential of the team+ we started picking it up right before trade. Still cannot believe we did it what a nightmare of epic proportions. Some of you guys probably are not old enough to know who spencer haywood and Bob macadoo are. well this is similar heck we still has pearl and frazier that first year--and we had a big young Lonnie Shelton decent role players and still scked. you cant just throw players together half arsed like that has to fit in a style of play. Carmelo has $ in the bank---hes got his--I dont trust him hes Marbury 2.


We've got 9 players under contract for next year. Obviously there will be some changes. Not everyone we have now will be coming back. So this is where the Knicks will look to build the team around STAT and Melo. A few key acquisitions can totally change the chemistry and balance of the team. It seems that there is too much emphasis being put on the roster as it is right now. Like i've said over and over, this is about the next 5 yrs.
Nalod
Posts: 71160
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/21/2011  12:55 PM
misterearl wrote:
Solace wrote:One more disappointing element of the trade. We traded a lot of tall guys and got nobody over 6'9" in return:

Mozgov - 7'1"
Curry - 6'11"
Anthony Randolph - 6'11"
Gallo - 6'10"

Any time you trade away that kind of size and don't get size back, you're asking for trouble. We were a little undersized before. Now, we're possibly the most undersized team in the league. That's never a good formula.

Now, we're trying to plug those holes with Jared Jeffries and it simply does not make up for the fact that we have no other bigs.

A 6'11 Jared Freakin' Jeffries, who cannot dunk or block a shot, does not count as height. He plays closer to 6'6. Anyone who mentions 6'4 Shelden Williams gets their tongue removed.

How quickly people forget the decade when the tallest Knick was either Kurt Thomas or David Lee, both at 6'9.

After the 5 minutes, 30 push ups for mentioning Eddy Curry.

6-4 sheldon?

YOu measure to the top of his head, not where his ears are!

martin
Posts: 76231
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/21/2011  12:58 PM
Nalod wrote:
misterearl wrote:
Solace wrote:One more disappointing element of the trade. We traded a lot of tall guys and got nobody over 6'9" in return:

Mozgov - 7'1"
Curry - 6'11"
Anthony Randolph - 6'11"
Gallo - 6'10"

Any time you trade away that kind of size and don't get size back, you're asking for trouble. We were a little undersized before. Now, we're possibly the most undersized team in the league. That's never a good formula.

Now, we're trying to plug those holes with Jared Jeffries and it simply does not make up for the fact that we have no other bigs.

A 6'11 Jared Freakin' Jeffries, who cannot dunk or block a shot, does not count as height. He plays closer to 6'6. Anyone who mentions 6'4 Shelden Williams gets their tongue removed.

How quickly people forget the decade when the tallest Knick was either Kurt Thomas or David Lee, both at 6'9.

After the 5 minutes, 30 push ups for mentioning Eddy Curry.

6-4 sheldon?

YOu measure to the top of his head, not where his ears are!

yeah but that forehead adds inches that dont really count.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
fishmike
Posts: 53832
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/21/2011  1:00 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:I'm sorry I'm not buying it. Chandler (22), Gallo (22), Felton (26), Mosgov (25), AR (21) + a pick are all gone for one guy in the long term plans but your selling me on a brighter future?

Also our cap is NOT in order. It would have been if we signed Melo as a FA like w/ Amare where his deal starts at $16mm(ish) a year. Instead we gave him an extention paying over $20mm a year. That kills big FA options. There's a little discussed caveat.

I'm desperate to be proven wrong. I'm calling it like I see it. Not pissing and moaning in the wind here. Melo didnt singlehandedly revive Denver. Camby, Nene and Andre Miller had a lot to do with that.

I've posted threads about how and with who are we going to build around. I'm over the trade. It was a bad trade and I accept that. Its up to Walsh or Isiah or whoever to replace the lost pieces and build something here. This year looks like a wash.

fishmike--theyre are intangibles that go beyond personnel. Our star really does not play MDA ball. Hes not really ball mover but a stopper.We had a team and a style --I mean we went 13-1--that showed the potential of the team+ we started picking it up right before trade. Still cannot believe we did it what a nightmare of epic proportions. Some of you guys probably are not old enough to know who spencer haywood and Bob macadoo are. well this is similar heck we still has pearl and frazier that first year--and we had a big young Lonnie Shelton decent role players and still scked. you cant just throw players together half arsed like that has to fit in a style of play. Carmelo has $ in the bank---hes got his--I dont trust him hes Marbury 2.

he's got a LOT to prove here. Its not off to a good start
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

3/21/2011  1:05 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:I'm sorry I'm not buying it. Chandler (22), Gallo (22), Felton (26), Mosgov (25), AR (21) + a pick are all gone for one guy in the long term plans but your selling me on a brighter future?

Also our cap is NOT in order. It would have been if we signed Melo as a FA like w/ Amare where his deal starts at $16mm(ish) a year. Instead we gave him an extention paying over $20mm a year. That kills big FA options. There's a little discussed caveat.

I'm desperate to be proven wrong. I'm calling it like I see it. Not pissing and moaning in the wind here. Melo didnt singlehandedly revive Denver. Camby, Nene and Andre Miller had a lot to do with that.

I've posted threads about how and with who are we going to build around. I'm over the trade. It was a bad trade and I accept that. Its up to Walsh or Isiah or whoever to replace the lost pieces and build something here. This year looks like a wash.

fishmike--theyre are intangibles that go beyond personnel. Our star really does not play MDA ball. Hes not really ball mover but a stopper.We had a team and a style --I mean we went 13-1--that showed the potential of the team+ we started picking it up right before trade. Still cannot believe we did it what a nightmare of epic proportions. Some of you guys probably are not old enough to know who spencer haywood and Bob macadoo are. well this is similar heck we still has pearl and frazier that first year--and we had a big young Lonnie Shelton decent role players and still scked. you cant just throw players together half arsed like that has to fit in a style of play. Carmelo has $ in the bank---hes got his--I dont trust him hes Marbury 2.

BRIGGS wrote:Gallo Chandler Randolph +2014 1 for Melo

You wanted to trade for the so-called Marbury 2....No?

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

3/21/2011  1:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/21/2011  1:10 PM
Dear Fishmike,

You're DAMN STRAIGHT my focus shifted to the Knicks bringing Jeffries back once the Melo trade was made..Filling those two open roster spots was very important as far as trying to win now, and get the most out of this year's team..If we could've made the right moves there and got two difference makers, it could've really helped us out a great deal..If we didn't, well, here we are with Jeffries and a benched Derrick Brown, scuffling..I feel, make that I KNOW, we could've done better..You wanna poo-poo a young 7' legit C talent like Marcus Cousin who could've solved a lot of problems for us, fine, go right ahead.. I get it, I get it -- some of you automatically associate the DL with the word 'scrub.' Pretty closed-minded if you ask me. I can't say how much I disagree with that but whatever...Forget the D-League---what about Troy Murphy? Why isn't this guy wearing orange and blue? More importantly, why didn't we at least attempt to get involved for his services? All accounts say we never did..Why is that? Who would you rather have--a healthy Troy Murphy or Jared Jeffries? You say Jeffries and you just don't know your NBA personnel..Simple as that..And forget this +/- horse**** OK? I don't care what that useless statistic has to say about him---I look at tangible evidence..The guy's has virtually ZERO impact & doesn't make us any better over playing Ronny Turiaf (which should've been the berometer for bringing in another big---to me he would've had to be a step up from Turiaf otherwise why bother). I'd like to call Jeffries the league's most overrated player, but sadly, I think the NY Knicks' coaching staff are the only ones out there overrating him..

As far as scouting useful players, I really gotta question the Knicks a little bit..I've always had the feeling that they either aren't looking in the right places for cheap talent or even if are, I feel Donnie might not have the confidence that his stubborn-as-sin-head coach would play the talent he's thought about bringing in (see Anthony Randolph, Derrick Brown, Corey Brewer, Andy Rautins, Jordan Hill), hence there would be no point..If that's how Donnie's going about his business, based on Mike's approval, then there's truly something wrong here..Either way I think it stinks, personally.. Not gonna stop me from making recommendations from the available players I've seen..Not for anything buddy, I don't see you recommending anyone to bring on board--just trashing others' thoughts..You don't like what I have to say, don't read it. Honestly, I'm so down on this board, I probably won't be doing much posting here anymore, so you won't have to worry.

Not sure what you're talking about with the 'pro-melo' contingent putting everyone down --- just speaking for myself, I never once tried to make anyone feel like an idiot for not liking the trade (in fact, I'M the one who's taken constant jabs from the know-it-alls on this board even since I joined a few years ago)..Believe me, when DEN started asking for more and more, I was on the fence with the whole thing for awhile there myself. I quickly realized a few things though: Melo's head & shoulders a better SF than Chandler or Gallo, we're on the verge of paying both of those guys big money anyway--I'd rather pay for the proven star, Gallo & Chandler are replaceable, Billups is a damn good player that could serve as an adequate bridge to 2012 FA when guys like CP3 and D-Will among other top PGs (Felton, Andre Miller) will be FAs, Mozgov sucked and this coach was never gonna play AR anyway--AR was done here right from the beginning of the season after he returned from a minor injury that sidelined him for the first couple of games.

"Felton, Melo, Gallo, Amare, Mosgov starting and Williams, Douglas and Turiaf off the bench. That team would be competing for a title." Wow, I can't stress how much I disagree with that statement. We weren't even close...I feel we're in a much better situation now with the solid two-star foundation, even with this current group all of a sudden underachieving..Now it's just a matter of building toward the ultimate goal..I personally think you do that with cheap/effective signings along the way as well as through the draft IN ADDITION to bigger FA signings..You gotta plot out a plan--no doubt they have: I don't see this summer as our time to strike in FA; the following summer will be. I'm not ready to panic and blow my load on a DeAndre Jordan when there are cheaper alternatives available I'd rather try first (i.e. bring in a Marcus Cousin right now, play the damn guy instead of Jeffries, and see what he's got. What if he's starting C material? I think he might be---let's bring him in and find out!).

"Fields is a cute player." Huh?? WTF does that mean? Dude's a tremendous support player on this team, completely team-oriented, and he's only a rookie. He's been great since day 1..HE IS the ROY in this league if Blake Griffin never got hurt last year..Far from the problem--he's part of the solution all the way..I can only hope we can keep him after next year..I can see him asking for the type of money we might not be able to afford if we expect to do something big around the same time in FA. Cute player..WOW..

"Anthony's game is as one dimensional as I always thought. Man can he score, but he needs a STRONG supporting cast around him, ad we dont have that and guys like Nene, Camby, a younger Billups, etc etc.. those guys arent easy to sign, draft or trade for." Wrong. SupremeCommander just touched on it (in a very rational rebuttal post I might add--kudos brother) he's ne of if not the best rebounder at his position..So if anything that makes him two-dimensional, no? At the very least..And what star doesn't need a strong supporting cast around him? Did Michael? Does Kobe? Did Ewing? Come on bro.. Who says we can't take the next year and a half to build it..It can be done, it's just gonna take some good moves and a little patience. I'm down with that..In the meantime, make the playoffs, shoot for the 6th seed and get the better draft pick over Houston..Those are my immediate goals and they're obtainable..To EXPECT anything else at this time is unreasonable. Here's one Knick fan who understands what time it is.

martin
Posts: 76231
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/21/2011  1:10 PM
Finestrg wrote:As far as scouting useful players, I really gotta question the Knicks a little bit..I've always had the feeling that they either aren't looking in the right places for cheap talent or even if are, I feel Donnie might not have the confidence that his stubborn-as-sin-head coach would play the talent he's thought about bringing in (see Anthony Randolph, Derrick Brown, Corey Brewer, Andy Rautins, Jordan Hill), hence there would be no point..If that's how Donnie's going about his business, based on Mike's approval, then there's truly something wrong here.

Fields, Moz, Shawne Williams kind of throw that theory off?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Nalod
Posts: 71160
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/21/2011  1:15 PM

When we talk about knicks storied history, the 1968-1974 was an abboration.

The norm is the kind of empty star studded roster that yields empty results.

Dolan was more scared over Nets getting Melo than overpaying for him.

Pretty simple.

Fishmike, we proud of the fight your putting up but the trade is done.

Briggy, YEah I remember Haywood-McAdoo. My friends and I were actually listening to the first game they played and they beat the Celtics. We were young, Starphuched and thought the "Knicks were back". What a freakin disaster!

Im rooting for Melo and this trade to work. I would not have done it, but its done.

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

3/21/2011  1:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/21/2011  1:26 PM
martin wrote:
Finestrg wrote:As far as scouting useful players, I really gotta question the Knicks a little bit..I've always had the feeling that they either aren't looking in the right places for cheap talent or even if are, I feel Donnie might not have the confidence that his stubborn-as-sin-head coach would play the talent he's thought about bringing in (see Anthony Randolph, Derrick Brown, Corey Brewer, Andy Rautins, Jordan Hill), hence there would be no point..If that's how Donnie's going about his business, based on Mike's approval, then there's truly something wrong here.

Fields, Moz, Shawne Williams kind of throw that theory off?

There have been exceptions: Fields is a good player (my favorite Knick in fact) and an EXCELLENT find..Shawne Williams turned out to be a very useful player (again good job by the orgainzation) but one we lean way too heavily on (come on, is this poor guy's role really to guard Dwight Howard one on one in the post??) and a guy, based on his surprisingly fine play this year, we might not even be able to keep..I didn't like Mozgov. i know you did--I did not. Too much money (a cap burden actually) for an unproven player who needs a ton of work. I still stand by my point: if Donnie is not going after young players that we could slide in and help the immediate cause, something I suspect might be going on, because of his coach's inability to being open to possibilities, it's a problem. Jeff Adrien has abilities we could've used yet Golden State grabs him, we didn't..Ditto Marcus Cousin with Utah..At least Cousin just became available again..I'd jump on him in a heartbeat but who knows if MDA would even play the kid. He probably wouldn't which renders the whole idea a waste of everyone's time.

Forget the playoffs---if we don't get the 6th seed and we finish with a worse record than Houston, I'd seriously consider a different coach..

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/21/2011  1:25 PM
The path to a title starts with your core. The plan was to get a core that you could seriously see being built into a title team. Starting with STAT and Melo is about as good as we could hope to get. There's still the opportunity to do much more. I fail to see why the trade has to be judged for how the team is constructed around them right now. It's not about right now and never was about right now. Even if we had kept a few more players this team wouldn't be a title team yet. The big we needed to really compete likely wasn't on the roster already and we would need to address that this off season anyway.
C'mon People, Really....Really.....

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy