TMS wrote:

JrZyHuStLa wrote:Its better than Gallinari's and Chandler's combined. I can't stress enough how important this aspect of his game is.

Discuss.

he's Gilbert Arenas. lol

Now he just needs to pull out a pistol.

CashMoney wrote:

JrZyHuStLa wrote:

misterearl wrote:Landry 7/8 from the Fields 6 rebounds and 6 assists.

He is more confident and competent with the ball than Douglas.

I think Douglas needs to improve his overall decision making for him to take the next step.

He already has improved his shot making ability.

He's never going to be a true PG.

QFT. Douglas is a good catch & shoot guy and can play really well off guys who dominate the ball as long as they look to kick to the perimeter, but he can't be relied upon to be a ballhandler and run teh offense. DWTDD is still an asset, though.

nixluva wrote:I believe that is his 19th Game winning shot in his career. I remember someone showing a stat that he leads active players in that stat.

he's 1 of the best closers in the NBA but you'll never hear the detractors give much more than a cursory mention of that major aspect of his game... they'd rather compare him to undisciplined chuckers like Gilbert Arenas & pat themselves on the back like they just said something intelligent.

Nalod wrote:

TMS wrote:i want to personally thank Jared Fishlips for his valuable contribution down the stretch of this game, if not for those multiple missed attempts at making a layup underneath the basket the game woulda never been so close & no game winning shot for Melo.

Jeffries = the missing piece

You have a unique polarizing approach.

Knicks won.

the guys singing the Dynastic Vessel's praises and claiming he's such an amazing pick up also said the Melo deal was trash

nixluva wrote:I believe that is his 19th Game winning shot in his career. I remember someone showing a stat that he leads active players in that stat.

JrZyHuStLa wrote:

TMS wrote:

nixluva wrote:I believe that is his 19th Game winning shot in his career. I remember someone showing a stat that he leads active players in that stat.

he's 1 of the best closers in the NBA but you'll never hear the detractors give much more than a cursory mention of that major aspect of his game... they'd rather compare him to undisciplined chuckers like Gilbert Arenas & pat themselves on the back like they just said something intelligent.

It's hard for people who think Gallinari has star potential to praise what Carmelo Anthony already is, a proven star player.

Some people are more in love with what could be as opposed to what already is....

nixluva wrote:I believe that is his 19th Game winning shot in his career. I remember someone showing a stat that he leads active players in that stat.

Mray20 wrote:Lebrick has one game winning 3 pointer hail mary against the Magic in the Playoffs.

This is how you react

JrZyHuStLa wrote:

TMS wrote:

nixluva wrote:I believe that is his 19th Game winning shot in his career. I remember someone showing a stat that he leads active players in that stat.

he's 1 of the best closers in the NBA but you'll never hear the detractors give much more than a cursory mention of that major aspect of his game... they'd rather compare him to undisciplined chuckers like Gilbert Arenas & pat themselves on the back like they just said something intelligent.

It's hard for people who think Gallinari has star potential to praise what Carmelo Anthony already is, a proven star player.

Galli who?

fishmike wrote:

Nalod wrote:

TMS wrote:i want to personally thank Jared Fishlips for his valuable contribution down the stretch of this game, if not for those multiple missed attempts at making a layup underneath the basket the game woulda never been so close & no game winning shot for Melo.

Jeffries = the missing piece

You have a unique polarizing approach.

Knicks won.

which makes PMS right :) the greatest feeling in the WORLD hehehe

Melo HAS to make those shots. We had guys who can fill out the stat sheet. What we traded 4 starters for was a guy who wins games. Big shot for Melo. He needed that. Good stuff

4 starters??? Don't let the facts get in the way of your arguement. It really was 2 starters for 2 starters. Chandler was coming off our bench and Mosgov started like 5 games after the season first 5 games. How many DNPs did he have. I liked those guys but be real. Also Billups was part of the trade BTW.

BigRedDog wrote:

fishmike wrote:

Nalod wrote:

TMS wrote:i want to personally thank Jared Fishlips for his valuable contribution down the stretch of this game, if not for those multiple missed attempts at making a layup underneath the basket the game woulda never been so close & no game winning shot for Melo.

Jeffries = the missing piece

You have a unique polarizing approach.

Knicks won.

which makes PMS right :) the greatest feeling in the WORLD hehehe

Melo HAS to make those shots. We had guys who can fill out the stat sheet. What we traded 4 starters for was a guy who wins games. Big shot for Melo. He needed that. Good stuff

4 starters??? Don't let the facts get in the way of your arguement. It really was 2 starters for 2 starters. Chandler was coming off our bench and Mosgov started like 5 games after the season first 5 games. How many DNPs did he have. I liked those guys but be real. Also Billups was part of the trade BTW.

yeah. it really came down for me to how far did i think that team had the potential to go? my answer was it was a slightly better than .500 team. i didn’t want to wait around 3 years to see if i was right.