Nalod wrote:Childs2Dudley wrote:No, Tom Thidobeau (because that's who I wanted to hire 3 years ago)
Toms a good coach. Do you think a rookie head coach could have handled and been effective with Marbury? Zack? Crawford? We turned the team over 3 times now.
Thibs has taken a playoff team over. It was a hell of a gig for him to get but a good young coach taking over a playoff team and adding Boozer with a star in the maker Drose is a good situation.
Don't forget, MDA rejected Bulls (dumb) because he wanted to be in NY. I thought we like guys that want to be in NY?
We got rid of all those guys in the first year so he really wouldn't have had to handle them at all.
No offense, but Mike came here because we gave him more money than the Bulls. That's really the main reason. Chicago had and still has a better overall roster than us but Thibodeau's defensive schemes have worked at every stop - from New York to Houston to Boston and now Chicago. This guy can coach defense and coach it well. And it doesn't seem like his teams have trouble scoring either, ala Van Gundy. I wanted this guy because I saw what he did for the Celtics and how all the players and even Doc credited him for their championship and I wanted this guy.
He's a Van Gundy disciple who coached here before and knew it was like, even if he was an assistant. We were going nowhere for 2 years anyway so fans were going to be patient regardless. I don't think there were any Fire D'Antoni chants or big time criticism in the media of Mike for the last 2 years. Tom could have survived and done fine.
"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale