[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks will be great with or without melo
Author Thread
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
2/18/2011  9:04 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:All we need are tons of low probability events to all happen. Then we're set!

AUTOADVERT
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

2/18/2011  9:24 AM
When Denver announced the 5 players plus a first round pick, you had to known that they were playing us for fools. Somehow, the team is chugging along with the pieces we have, and can only get stronger as players begin to find their groove within the system. With anything, you look to fine tune its' performance, not destroy it to start over again.
"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/18/2011  9:44 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
Vmart wrote:Not without Melo.

we will be great with or without him. this is a good YOUNG team now--next year we will be MUCH improved from within and additions. Im confidant that we should stay the course. Either get melo for a very reasonable fee before deadline--or FA. If he really wants to come here that will be the case. If not have fun somewhere else. Getting better in the NBA is a process and if we build a team that is very strong 1-12 like dallas like SA---we will be right up there.

I don't think the Knicks will be a great team without Melo. Chandler, Gallo aren't the world beaters that you seem to think they are. What I don't understand is if you are having trouble parting with players now for Melo when will you be OK to part with the Players that we currently have. I like the attributes that some of the Knicks players have but I don't think they have the Championship attribute necessary to win at the highest level in the NBA.

We have young players that are maybe another 3-4 years away before they play at their highest level, with that in mind we have a franchise player in Amare who probably has 3 years at the highest level of play. Window is short, Knicks need to go all in now or you just have another Pat Ewing situation, where talent wasn't the highest in his prime and when not in prime the Sprewell and Houston come in. To be honest this team still isn't equal to the teams Ewing had talent wise. So you are gonna waste Amare's prime years waiting for the talent to rise. You want to do the process of growing the young or swing for the fences like Boston, Miami and the Lakers, Hell even Orlando swapped almost their entire starting lineup in hopes to make good on Howard's time in Orlando and is swinging away in hopes of getting a team that can compete even higher than they were competing at.

You stand pat with the young, I don't see the Knicks being great. Just look at Atlanta good team but you know they aren't gonna win anything, at this moment I feel like that is where the Knicks are heading in an Atlanta direction. Atlanta has good talent but you know that talent isn't good enough to win you a chip. They have been at this longer than the Knicks. I don't see the Knicks being great without Melo he is an integral part of what the Knicks need to get into the elite status.

I was watching Bob Knight do an analysis on Kemba Walker, he showed the effectiveness of Walker without the ball and how he draws attention from the opposition he is an elite player in college. Melo does the same thing he draws so much attention from the opposition they pretty much have to game plan for him. Melo is gonna help make scrubs look good with Amare on his team that is why the Knicks need Melo he will help them get to the elite level.

GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
2/18/2011  9:49 AM
The more I look at this, I think DW should play hard ball. If they take Curry, AR and Chandler, then fine make the deal. Why Chandler? Most likely he will not be resigned anyway if Melo makes it to FA. IF not, then hold on to what you got and make some moves that strengthen the team at C and backup PG. With AZ coming back, I think the team will be alright and they will make the playoffs and learn what that is like.

Carmelo has not lead Denver to the Finals yet and he has had a pretty good team. He just is not that kind of player. LBJ led a crappy Cleveland team to the finals, he would be worth everyone but Amare and that is essentially what Miami did. We have yet to see if the Miami plan turns into a championship.

Carmelo alone does not take NY to the top. Carmelo and Amare without Gallo, Fields, Mozgov is not so great either. THe Knicks need these guys together with Melo. I agree with DW, the team would NOT be better if NY traded all of them for Melo.

Kobe gets the rings but he needs Fisher hitting those big 3's. Duncan got the rings but needed Horry as his runnning mate. My point is you need the solid role players along with the stars. IF denver wont make the deal, get Melo as a FA and then you have a solid team and a team that could compete instantly even without a Paul or Williams, IMO.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/18/2011  10:00 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/18/2011  10:01 AM
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:The more I look at this, I think DW should play hard ball. If they take Curry, AR and Chandler, then fine make the deal. Why Chandler? Most likely he will not be resigned anyway if Melo makes it to FA. IF not, then hold on to what you got and make some moves that strengthen the team at C and backup PG. With AZ coming back, I think the team will be alright and they will make the playoffs and learn what that is like.

Carmelo has not lead Denver to the Finals yet and he has had a pretty good team. He just is not that kind of player. LBJ led a crappy Cleveland team to the finals, he would be worth everyone but Amare and that is essentially what Miami did. We have yet to see if the Miami plan turns into a championship.

Carmelo alone does not take NY to the top. Carmelo and Amare without Gallo, Fields, Mozgov is not so great either. THe Knicks need these guys together with Melo. I agree with DW, the team would NOT be better if NY traded all of them for Melo.

Kobe gets the rings but he needs Fisher hitting those big 3's. Duncan got the rings but needed Horry as his runnning mate. My point is you need the solid role players along with the stars. IF denver wont make the deal, get Melo as a FA and then you have a solid team and a team that could compete instantly even without a Paul or Williams, IMO.

I ask you which one is more readily available a Superstar or a Role player? I too agree that Walsh shouldn't gut the entire team but lets be real here if he has to, to get Melo I will not fault him.

Nalod
Posts: 71178
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/18/2011  10:08 AM
Vmart, its not where the team is now but what it can be.

NObody can see the future.

ATL made a big mistke using Horeford as a center. Josh SMith at PF makes for an athletic duo but not big enough.

They are paying big money for Smith, Horford, Bibby and overpaid on Joe Johnson. THey are locked in. We are not. With Melo, a fine fine player you end up getting locked in also.

Its very important that Amare get a big to play with to free him up. Melo does not do this. ITs important that Felton get backed up. If you use too much assets in getting melo you are all in with Mozzy as your big.

Its easy to say "get him" but the ramifications are the details and someone has to sweat them.

Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
2/18/2011  10:43 AM
Vmart wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:The more I look at this, I think DW should play hard ball. If they take Curry, AR and Chandler, then fine make the deal. Why Chandler? Most likely he will not be resigned anyway if Melo makes it to FA. IF not, then hold on to what you got and make some moves that strengthen the team at C and backup PG. With AZ coming back, I think the team will be alright and they will make the playoffs and learn what that is like.

Carmelo has not lead Denver to the Finals yet and he has had a pretty good team. He just is not that kind of player. LBJ led a crappy Cleveland team to the finals, he would be worth everyone but Amare and that is essentially what Miami did. We have yet to see if the Miami plan turns into a championship.

Carmelo alone does not take NY to the top. Carmelo and Amare without Gallo, Fields, Mozgov is not so great either. THe Knicks need these guys together with Melo. I agree with DW, the team would NOT be better if NY traded all of them for Melo.

Kobe gets the rings but he needs Fisher hitting those big 3's. Duncan got the rings but needed Horry as his runnning mate. My point is you need the solid role players along with the stars. IF denver wont make the deal, get Melo as a FA and then you have a solid team and a team that could compete instantly even without a Paul or Williams, IMO.

I ask you which one is more readily available a Superstar or a Role player? I too agree that Walsh shouldn't gut the entire team but lets be real here if he has to, to get Melo I will not fault him.

I would fault him. If you gut the entire team, lose your capspace, give up pics, give up your young guys and all you got is Melo and Amar'e, maybe mosgov, then to me, you're not contending for a championship. That still isn't a team better than the Heat, and chances are, we wont be under the cap for 2012 anyway, with those two huge contracts. To me, it's far more worth it to wait for free agency. It's not even something worth thinking about actually.

Especially considering that Melo isn't even on LeBrons level! He's a boarderline superstar. Not a top 5 player though, and that's what gutting the team is doing. Acting like we are going for a full blown super duper star.... It's completely not worth that.

And now people are willing to give up Felton? Please. Give me a break.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
2/18/2011  10:43 AM
Nalod wrote:Vmart, its not where the team is now but what it can be.

NObody can see the future.

ATL made a big mistke using Horeford as a center. Josh SMith at PF makes for an athletic duo but not big enough.

They are paying big money for Smith, Horford, Bibby and overpaid on Joe Johnson. THey are locked in. We are not. With Melo, a fine fine player you end up getting locked in also.

Its very important that Amare get a big to play with to free him up. Melo does not do this. ITs important that Felton get backed up. If you use too much assets in getting melo you are all in with Mozzy as your big.

Its easy to say "get him" but the ramifications are the details and someone has to sweat them.

Melo will open the floor for Amar'e. They're will be times when Melo is doubled leaving STAT in one on one situations. Melo can also create his own shot and has a post game. If the Knicks get Melo they'll still need a big to rebound but that can be addressed. I think we all can agree that Melo will make the Knicks better if we don't give up too much. Melo on the Knicks will be great but it all depends on the price.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
2/18/2011  10:47 AM
CashMoney wrote:
Nalod wrote:Vmart, its not where the team is now but what it can be.

NObody can see the future.

ATL made a big mistke using Horeford as a center. Josh SMith at PF makes for an athletic duo but not big enough.

They are paying big money for Smith, Horford, Bibby and overpaid on Joe Johnson. THey are locked in. We are not. With Melo, a fine fine player you end up getting locked in also.

Its very important that Amare get a big to play with to free him up. Melo does not do this. ITs important that Felton get backed up. If you use too much assets in getting melo you are all in with Mozzy as your big.

Its easy to say "get him" but the ramifications are the details and someone has to sweat them.

Melo will open the floor for Amar'e. They're will be times when Melo is doubled leaving STAT in one on one situations. Melo can also create his own shot and has a post game. If the Knicks get Melo they'll still need a big to rebound but that can be addressed. I think we all can agree that Melo will make the Knicks better if we don't give up too much. Melo on the Knicks will be great but it all depends on the price.

We'll be a better and much improved offensive team. That is correct. However, gutting the team would leave us heavily and I mean HEAVILY flawed on the defensive end though and even on offense, most likely, and we'd have no resources to improve. The team you'd see would be the team we'd have for a good few years. No f'ing thanks.

And chances of 2012 would be slim to none.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
2/18/2011  10:50 AM
Kobe/James James/Kobe - These two are the only playes on that level. Melo is not a boderline superstar, he is a superstar. There are only 2 SF's in the game that you can honestly say are better and number 2 is debatable. 1. Lebron 2. Durant 3. Melo

Yeah I agree that giving up the team for Melo does not help the situation. Giving up Felton is risky business considering his age but he's inked for 2 years anyway and there is no guarantee that he re-ups with the Knicks or if the Knicks will want to re-up him at that time. We can get 2 years out of Billups.


Especially considering that Melo isn't even on LeBrons level! He's a boarderline superstar. Not a top 5 player though, and that's what gutting the team is doing. Acting like we are going for a full blown super duper star.... It's completely not worth that.

And now people are willing to give up Felton? Please. Give me a break.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/18/2011  10:52 AM
Nalod, the Knicks should get Melo at all costs. If you want a chance at a championship you do the deal. Melo, Amare and Billups not bad to start with. The Knicks can always pick up players along the way with MLE, players that get released and cuts. I would not hesitate to get Melo on the Knicks. I do know its a negotiation and they should try to hold back as many assets as possible to get the deal done. To get Melo I will not fret to much if Walsh has to give up the package mentioned before. I have full confidence that the presence of Melo and Amare will make what the Knicks have on the roster better.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
2/18/2011  10:56 AM
CashMoney wrote:Kobe/James James/Kobe - These two are the only playes on that level. Melo is not a boderline superstar, he is a superstar. There are only 2 SF's in the game that you can honestly say are better and number 2 is debatable. 1. Lebron 2. Durant 3. Melo

Yeah I agree that giving up the team for Melo does not help the situation. Giving up Felton is risky business considering his age but he's inked for 2 years anyway and there is no guarantee that he re-ups with the Knicks or if the Knicks will want to re-up him at that time. We can get 2 years out of Billups.


Especially considering that Melo isn't even on LeBrons level! He's a boarderline superstar. Not a top 5 player though, and that's what gutting the team is doing. Acting like we are going for a full blown super duper star.... It's completely not worth that.

And now people are willing to give up Felton? Please. Give me a break.

Superstars, IMO, play defense too. LeBron, Kobe and Wade play defense. Melo doesn't. That's what separates the two levels. Plus Melo isn't nearly the willing passer that those other 3 are.

Duncan, KG, Shaq (In his prime when he was a major shotblocker), Kobe, Wade, LeBron. These guys are all NBA defensive guys. So was MJ. Carmello doesn't even give the effort a lot of times. It's why I'm so lukewarm on the idea on getting him in the first place.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
2/18/2011  10:56 AM
Vmart wrote:Nalod, the Knicks should get Melo at all costs. If you want a chance at a championship you do the deal. Melo, Amare and Billups not bad to start with. The Knicks can always pick up players along the way with MLE, players that get released and cuts. I would not hesitate to get Melo on the Knicks. I do know its a negotiation and they should try to hold back as many assets as possible to get the deal done. To get Melo I will not fret to much if Walsh has to give up the package mentioned before. I have full confidence that the presence of Melo and Amare will make what the Knicks have on the roster better.

We'd hurt our chances even more if we gave everything up for Melo.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
GustavBahler
Posts: 42814
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

2/18/2011  11:03 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/18/2011  11:10 AM
I worry about how long Amare is going to be able to play at this pace without any all-star caliber help, I agree with Vmart on that one. They will be good in the next few years but without another reliable scorer who can consistently create his own shot, I don't believe that they will be great.

Its not just what the Knicks do but how their roster stacks up against other teams. The Heat are probably going to be in the conference finals every year once Boston's big three heads for the glue factory. Even with some high picks unless they add another go to guy, be it Paul, Melo, whoever, the Knicks will probably stay in the middle of the pack.

tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

2/18/2011  11:04 AM
Some people get caught up in numbers. I'm definitely convinced now that Mike's ststem helps many players stats out. Chandler is certainly not a 16 a game guy on any other team unless he shots a ton of shots. Gallo consistently gets to the line but now is struggling with his jumper. Everyone, from Felton to Gallo to even Amare, all take very questionable shots. This isn't such a great team to build with and I dont think most guys on this squad will ever reach their full potential.
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
2/18/2011  11:05 AM
Allanfan20 wrote:
CashMoney wrote:Kobe/James James/Kobe - These two are the only playes on that level. Melo is not a boderline superstar, he is a superstar. There are only 2 SF's in the game that you can honestly say are better and number 2 is debatable. 1. Lebron 2. Durant 3. Melo

Yeah I agree that giving up the team for Melo does not help the situation. Giving up Felton is risky business considering his age but he's inked for 2 years anyway and there is no guarantee that he re-ups with the Knicks or if the Knicks will want to re-up him at that time. We can get 2 years out of Billups.


Especially considering that Melo isn't even on LeBrons level! He's a boarderline superstar. Not a top 5 player though, and that's what gutting the team is doing. Acting like we are going for a full blown super duper star.... It's completely not worth that.

And now people are willing to give up Felton? Please. Give me a break.

Superstars, IMO, play defense too. LeBron, Kobe and Wade play defense. Melo doesn't. That's what separates the two levels. Plus Melo isn't nearly the willing passer that those other 3 are.

Duncan, KG, Shaq (In his prime when he was a major shotblocker), Kobe, Wade, LeBron. These guys are all NBA defensive guys. So was MJ. Carmello doesn't even give the effort a lot of times. It's why I'm so lukewarm on the idea on getting him in the first place.

He's an average defender but a good rebounder and scorer. It's not like he doesn't try to defend it's just that he's an average defender. At the end of the day we're talking about getting one of the best players at the SF position. I want MELO in NY, it just depends on the price. I see what you're saying but the man is still a star. We're not trying to get Melo to make him Bat Man, he would be coming in as Robin.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/18/2011  11:06 AM
Allanfan20 wrote:
Vmart wrote:Nalod, the Knicks should get Melo at all costs. If you want a chance at a championship you do the deal. Melo, Amare and Billups not bad to start with. The Knicks can always pick up players along the way with MLE, players that get released and cuts. I would not hesitate to get Melo on the Knicks. I do know its a negotiation and they should try to hold back as many assets as possible to get the deal done. To get Melo I will not fret to much if Walsh has to give up the package mentioned before. I have full confidence that the presence of Melo and Amare will make what the Knicks have on the roster better.

We'd hurt our chances even more if we gave everything up for Melo.

No we would not. I think you are over hyping what we have. Take away Amare from the team do you honestly think that we are a playoff team are Wilson Chander and Gallo going to carry the Knicks into the playoffs these guys are still 2-3-4 years away. Add Melo in their place and guess what Melo will get the Knicks in the playoffs you underestimate the presence of a superstar. He has presence that makes others better. I don't want to give up a ton of assest who the hell does, but if I have to get Melo, I will and I know it will be for the better.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/18/2011  2:15 PM
Allanfan20 wrote:
CashMoney wrote:Kobe/James James/Kobe - These two are the only playes on that level. Melo is not a boderline superstar, he is a superstar. There are only 2 SF's in the game that you can honestly say are better and number 2 is debatable. 1. Lebron 2. Durant 3. Melo

Yeah I agree that giving up the team for Melo does not help the situation. Giving up Felton is risky business considering his age but he's inked for 2 years anyway and there is no guarantee that he re-ups with the Knicks or if the Knicks will want to re-up him at that time. We can get 2 years out of Billups.


Especially considering that Melo isn't even on LeBrons level! He's a boarderline superstar. Not a top 5 player though, and that's what gutting the team is doing. Acting like we are going for a full blown super duper star.... It's completely not worth that.

And now people are willing to give up Felton? Please. Give me a break.

Superstars, IMO, play defense too. LeBron, Kobe and Wade play defense. Melo doesn't. That's what separates the two levels. Plus Melo isn't nearly the willing passer that those other 3 are.

Duncan, KG, Shaq (In his prime when he was a major shotblocker), Kobe, Wade, LeBron. These guys are all NBA defensive guys. So was MJ. Carmello doesn't even give the effort a lot of times. It's why I'm so lukewarm on the idea on getting him in the first place.

Magic Johnson never made an All-Defensive team, was he a superstar in your estimation? are Dirk Nowitzki or Kevin Durant superstars or 2nd tier in your eyes? just trying to see where you draw the line, you point out examples of superstars who are all NBA defensive guys, & i agree w/all of your choices they are all legitimate superstars in their own right, but is playing elite defense the deciding criteria to determine a superstar's worth, or can he be one based on having elite offensive game? btw, i'm not comparing Melo to Magic so hopefully u won't take it in that sense... Magic was a legendary alltime player, no one is gonna confuse Melo w/him, but Melo can be stacked up with Dirk Nowitzki or Kevin Durant anyday IMO.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
2/18/2011  2:32 PM
WTF?

The Knicks will never be able to win without Melo. He is our plan A through Z. The sky is falling. We're all doomed.

How ever did anyone win the NBA championship before Melo? Once the Nets get him they will be in the Finals every year.

He's a great player but gimme a F-in break. I can't wait for this **** to be done with.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
TLover
Posts: 21066
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/12/2003
Member: #381
USA
2/18/2011  2:46 PM
I'm okay with the Knicks NOT getting Melo...I like the team we have now but granted we're NOT a champioship team, but we are a TEAM. If people can be a bit more patient we can save our assets for next season (when we can trade our 1st round pick) for a Dwight Howard or Deron Williams. Those are the 2 players I would want over Melo & Paul. We do run the risk of a franchise tag being implemented. For some reason I don't see the NBA going that route. Just lower salaries.

We need to stay patient and trust in Donnie Walsh.

Knicks will be great with or without melo

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy