[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If you had to let go of Gallo OR Fields in Melo deal.... Which?


Author Poll
Elite
Posts: 6372
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

Let's say the framework of the deal is something like....

Chandler, Randolph(1st round), Curry.... and Denver said you have to include EITHER

Gallo or Fields...

Which would you let go of to make this deal happen?

I'd trade Gallo
I'd trade Fields
I would not include either
I'd trade both
View Results


Author Thread
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

2/16/2011  11:09 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

I think Fields does too. 17 rebounds in a game is no joke. I'll take 17 rebound potential over 8 or 9 3PM--especially when the two would be stars aren't the roll-your-sleeves up type on the defensive end


Fields' defense is definitely a bit overrated but I do love his hustle, rebounding, IQ, timing, etc. He's the kind of guy that regardless of potential would be a great role player on any team and he just seems like a winner. You could say he's more consistent than Gallo or Will as they seem to have their ups and downs while Fields brings it just about every game. I like them both but hell for Melo and then the possibility of DWill or CP3 I could almost care less what happens with them.
AUTOADVERT
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

2/16/2011  11:12 AM
tj23 wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

I think Fields does too. 17 rebounds in a game is no joke. I'll take 17 rebound potential over 8 or 9 3PM--especially when the two would be stars aren't the roll-your-sleeves up type on the defensive end


Fields' defense is definitely a bit overrated but I do love his hustle, rebounding, IQ, timing, etc. He's the kind of guy that regardless of potential would be a great role player on any team and he just seems like a winner. You could say he's more consistent than Gallo or Will as they seem to have their ups and downs while Fields brings it just about every game. I like them both but hell for Melo and then the possibility of DWill or CP3 I could almost care less what happens with them.

I'll agree with you there... my *preference* is to keep Fields. But I won't cry over losing one or the other because of what's coming back to the Knicks

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/16/2011  11:16 AM
I could live either one, just get Melo here.
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

2/16/2011  11:19 AM
Imagine Paul, Fields, Melo, Amare, Mosgov? And then a bench worse than Miami's with the money left over. I dont even think keeping Mosgov is a possibility. Actually if we get Paul I dont think we could even afford to re-sign Gallo unless the bird rule could be applied or something. Too many rules to the cap. That ish is confusing. Just get Melo. That's top priority...
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/16/2011  11:24 AM
tj23 wrote:Imagine Paul, Fields, Melo, Amare, Mosgov? And then a bench worse than Miami's with the money left over. I dont even think keeping Mosgov is a possibility. Actually if we get Paul I dont think we could even afford to re-sign Gallo unless the bird rule could be applied or something. Too many rules to the cap. That ish is confusing. Just get Melo. That's top priority...

Every team that is good basically breaks the bank to keep players and stay good. Now what is the new CBA going to be?

Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

2/16/2011  1:59 PM
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

Can't see Melo at SG, except for certain match-ups.

An intriguing mismatch when we are on offense, but I just can't see him chasing after smaller and more active SGs.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

2/16/2011  2:07 PM
Paladin55 wrote:
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

Can't see Melo at SG, except for certain match-ups.

An intriguing mismatch when we are on offense, but I just can't see him chasing after smaller and more active SGs.

my ideal lineup

Felton
Buike
Fields
Melo
Amar'e

looks like that would have more to do with Buike's health than anything though

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
martin
Posts: 76257
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/16/2011  2:17 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
Paladin55 wrote:
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

Can't see Melo at SG, except for certain match-ups.

An intriguing mismatch when we are on offense, but I just can't see him chasing after smaller and more active SGs.

my ideal lineup

Felton
Buike
Fields
Melo
Amar'e

looks like that would have more to do with Buike's health than anything though

that front court would give up layup after layup and get dominated nightly.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

2/16/2011  2:23 PM
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
Paladin55 wrote:
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

Can't see Melo at SG, except for certain match-ups.

An intriguing mismatch when we are on offense, but I just can't see him chasing after smaller and more active SGs.

my ideal lineup

Felton
Buike
Fields
Melo
Amar'e

looks like that would have more to do with Buike's health than anything though

that front court would give up layup after layup and get dominated nightly.

how is that any different than today

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
GustavBahler
Posts: 42814
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

2/16/2011  2:36 PM
Gallo has more upside than Fields but becomes redundant unless he becomes a better post player.
martin
Posts: 76257
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/16/2011  2:37 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
Paladin55 wrote:
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

Can't see Melo at SG, except for certain match-ups.

An intriguing mismatch when we are on offense, but I just can't see him chasing after smaller and more active SGs.

my ideal lineup

Felton
Buike
Fields
Melo
Amar'e

looks like that would have more to do with Buike's health than anything though

that front court would give up layup after layup and get dominated nightly.

how is that any different than today

for one, that's why the Knicks are trying to upgrade.

Moz has also been introduced.

Amear and Melo at the PF, SF is MUCH different than both of them at C and PF.

And I think it's the same with Fields, he can use size and athleticism to keep up at the SG spot but not SF.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

2/16/2011  2:51 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/16/2011  2:51 PM
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
Paladin55 wrote:
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

Can't see Melo at SG, except for certain match-ups.

An intriguing mismatch when we are on offense, but I just can't see him chasing after smaller and more active SGs.

my ideal lineup

Felton
Buike
Fields
Melo
Amar'e

looks like that would have more to do with Buike's health than anything though

that front court would give up layup after layup and get dominated nightly.

how is that any different than today

for one, that's why the Knicks are trying to upgrade.

Moz has also been introduced.

Amear and Melo at the PF, SF is MUCH different than both of them at C and PF.

And I think it's the same with Fields, he can use size and athleticism to keep up at the SG spot but not SF.

Fields was a PF in college. I think he's smart and crafty enough to adjust to SF. NBA.com has him as the 30th in the league rebounding and 43rd in 3P%. I'm sorry, but I'd like to see his priority be rebounding and distance shooting--the small forward position.

It's not like that roster is a final product. Shift Amar'e to the 4, Melo to the 3, and the best of Buike and Fields to the 2 if you can find a difference making center, and involve Mozgov or Jerome Jordan or whoever in the rotation. I don't know. Far from an ideal front court, agreed, but the team gets no worse off up front and gets substantially better in others. I'd roll with that this season and have no problem with it

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
2/16/2011  2:52 PM
Fields is a nice Player no doubt about it!!

Better then Gallo?..... No he is not!!

He is a hustle player and I would love to keep both but if It was Melo for say
Chandler Fields Curry and picks I say ok!

We keep Gallo and can use AR to bring us Mayo

Then we have a squad

Felton
Mayo
Melo
Amare
Moz

And 6th man of then next ten years ala Kevin Machale

Danilo Gallinari

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

2/16/2011  2:52 PM
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
Paladin55 wrote:
tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.

Can't see Melo at SG, except for certain match-ups.

An intriguing mismatch when we are on offense, but I just can't see him chasing after smaller and more active SGs.

my ideal lineup

Felton
Buike
Fields
Melo
Amar'e

looks like that would have more to do with Buike's health than anything though

that front court would give up layup after layup and get dominated nightly.

And by the end of the year it would be worn down to the point where we would fade during the regular season or be a paper lion in the playoffs.

I would say that this is the kind of thing Melo has to think about too- the kind of team he would be coming to if one of the extreme give-up trades ideas goes through.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
If you had to let go of Gallo OR Fields in Melo deal.... Which?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy