martin wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:martin wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:Paladin55 wrote:tj23 wrote:I think Melo is capable of playing SG. I'd keep Gallo either way. Fields is solid. Has the intangibles, may or may not have hit his ceiling to some extent. Gallo shows flashes of being an all star.
Can't see Melo at SG, except for certain match-ups.
An intriguing mismatch when we are on offense, but I just can't see him chasing after smaller and more active SGs.
my ideal lineup
Felton
Buike
Fields
Melo
Amar'e
looks like that would have more to do with Buike's health than anything though
that front court would give up layup after layup and get dominated nightly.
how is that any different than today
for one, that's why the Knicks are trying to upgrade.
Moz has also been introduced.
Amear and Melo at the PF, SF is MUCH different than both of them at C and PF.
And I think it's the same with Fields, he can use size and athleticism to keep up at the SG spot but not SF.
Fields was a PF in college. I think he's smart and crafty enough to adjust to SF. NBA.com has him as the 30th in the league rebounding and 43rd in 3P%. I'm sorry, but I'd like to see his priority be rebounding and distance shooting--the small forward position.
It's not like that roster is a final product. Shift Amar'e to the 4, Melo to the 3, and the best of Buike and Fields to the 2 if you can find a difference making center, and involve Mozgov or Jerome Jordan or whoever in the rotation. I don't know. Far from an ideal front court, agreed, but the team gets no worse off up front and gets substantially better in others. I'd roll with that this season and have no problem with it